Looking for a business loan? Check out these 8 government loan schemes EXCLUSIVE for Indian women in business!
"Careful!" "Don’t run too fast!" "Let’s not be wild!" Do you know that girls hear these phrases more than boys? Why aren’t we teaching our boys to be safe?
“Careful!” “Don’t run too fast!” “Let’s not be wild!” Do you know that girls hear these phrases more than boys? Why aren’t we teaching our boys to be safe?
I was at the playground with my kids, one day when I noticed a young boy rush in front of a girl with his hand held up.
“Guys, can’t you see there is a girl here! Don’t be rough.” He yelled out.
It was sweet to see a boy of four or five want to protect a girl of eight or nine. Yet the incident somehow stuck in my mind. What is it about our society that entrusts boys with the responsibility of protecting the girls? Why is it that from an early age, we bring gender into the conversation and make kids believe that girls, no matter what age are frail and delicate and need to be shielded from the unpleasantness of rough play? Boys, on the other hand, are boys. They can be as wild as they want to be, breaking bones and shooting each other with (Nerf) guns and falling from trees. Why would a girl want to do that?
Much as I would love to explain why a girl would want to do that, as a girl who grew up doing pretty much what she wanted and as the mother of a daughter who grows up knowing that our genitals do not dictate what toy we want to play with, that is not the position I am here to write about. I am here in the position as the mother of a son worrying about the impact that this has on my boy.
Every time, we reinforce a female’s supposed frailty we are teaching our boys that the only way forward for him, if he wants to identify as male is to be stereotypically masculine – to be loud, unconcerned about invading someone else’s space, to take risks, play rough and be wary of expressing gentler emotions, for fear of being a ‘sissy’. There are multiple ways this hurts our sons.
While playing rough builds character, when it is limited to one gender, we are teaching them it is fine to segregate on the basis of gender. Every time we characterize expressing emotions as feminine, we are teaching our boys to suppress their natural instincts.
Studies have shown that boys as young as five and six are already conditioned to hide their true feelings, as ‘boys don’t cry’ and ‘boys don’t play with dolls’. Is it a wonder that we as a society denounce men for not being sensitive enough or even completely oblivious to the emotions of others when they have been repeatedly told that to do so is a repudiation of their gender?
Another dangerous side-effect of not curbing boys as much as we curb girls, is unwittingly letting them believe that reckless behaviour is a part of being ‘male’.
Studies have shown that unintentional injuries are one of the most important causes of death in children beyond the age of one. The rate of getting injured increases throughout the years, with it peaking in adolescence and teenage boys get injured more than girls. Researchers cite many causes for these with one of the leading ones being ‘psycho-social conditioning’ or behaviour that becomes more or less routine or at the very least frequent, due to the psychological factors or social environment the child is exposed to.
For example, parents allowing boys to roam further away from the home and play alone without direct supervision, than girls of the same age
Or boys allowed to engage in exploratory play without being restrained while girls that indulge in the same behaviour are restricted.
All of this contributes to a false sense of security in our boys who start to internalize that risk taking is not a big deal, sometimes with fatal consequences.
Society has always put the onus of being careful on the woman. Do not go out after a certain time. Dress a certain way. Do not attract attention.
Be careful. Be careful. Be careful.
And why should we be so careful?
For men are careless – they are allowed to be careless with other people’s emotions, bodies, lives and themselves. They are, to a great extent conditioned to be so. So much so that boys fail to see that they themselves could be victims too.
According to a study reported in Time Magazine, girls have a 1 in 4 chance of being molested and boys have a 1 in 6 chance of being molested before the age of 18. Research shows that males are less likely to report sexual abuse. Since boys are conditioned from an early age to be more physical, they are more hesitant to report abuse, considering it to be a part of being a boy rather than inappropriate behaviour. They don’t talk about it, as “talking and expressing your feelings are not what boys do”. That is for girls.
As I look down at my sweet little one-year-old baby boy, my heart breaks a little. That is not the world I want for him. I have made sure that his four-year-old sister knows her gender does not determine either her favourite colour by default or what she wants to be when she grows up. And I want my son to know that he too can be whomever he wants to be – in a world he can play with dolls and express emotions, without being called ‘girly’ or deemed ‘lesser than’. I want him to know that he can tell me whatever he wants and that just as he should respect other people’s bodies, his body should be respected as well. What I want for them is a world where both boys and girls have to be careful or even better, a world where children are safe, irrespective of their gender.
As Gloria Steinem put it, “We’ve begun to raise our daughters more like sons, but few have the courage to raise our sons more like our daughters.” And I believe that, that is the key to teaching our boys to be safe while making sure that they get to reach their full potential without being weighed down by the prejudices and preconceived notions of previous generations.
Click here to read the study on why ‘Boys Engage in More Risk-Taking Than Girls’
Become a premium user on Women’s Web and get access to exclusive content for women, plus useful Women’s Web events and resources in your city.
Image source: shutterstock
Shweta Ganesh Kumar is a writer, blogger and creator of the modern Indian parenting blog ‘The Times Of Amma’,and 'Inkspire' - the digital platform for aspiring Indian writers. She was awarded the prestigious UN Laadli read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
As a mother, Neha had always been there for her daughter. Why couldn't her daughter be there for her when Neha needed someone to talk to?
Neha was having severe problems with her periods. Her periods were highly irregular.
Once they had stopped altogether for 8 months after a long period of three years of hot flashes, and she was hopeful that her menopause had arrived. But presumably not so! She had heavier than usual period soon after.
These intermittent on-and-off intervals of period puzzled her a lot. Not that she hadn’t shown to the gynaecologists, but the prolonged period of menopause was very irritating and difficult.
As a working woman, if I wish to take care of my mother, why do you have a problem with it?
When I joined one of the organisations on deputation, I was asked to fill up several forms as usual.
One of the forms was related to the individual’s dependents. In that, I also filled up the name of my mother, which I had been doing since the time my father died.
Immediately the junior official exclaimed, “You can’t fill up your mother’s name as a dependent!”
Please enter your email address