The Orange Flower is back with double energy and even stronger voices! Join us in celebrating women’s voices. Register Now
The Orange Flower is here!We are ready to hear powerful voices in sixteen different categories. Nominate for awards!
This post offers up an articulation of what feminism is, and how it can be used to further the rights of everyone, regardless of their gender.
I do expect a lot of ire from my sisters herein when I say that notwithstanding the fact that feminism mainly focuses on women’s issues, feminism in its widest sense seeks gender equality, hence it must necessarily include men’s liberation as well. There is no denying the fact that men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles thrust upon them by our age old customs, though admittedly not as badly affected as women in India.
To those women who act upon false notions about feminism, please do not put the word feminism to any further disgrace by identifying the same as man hating or man bashing. Feminism just tends to break the patriarchal sheath that we live in, for the woman in us to emerge and assert primarily as a human being. In the process, as some comforts bestowed upon men by age old traditions and culture gets shattered for the betterment of women in general , they seem to feel that the ideologies are anti-men. In the present Indian scenario as women need more empowerment in comparison to their male counterparts, the word feminism just appears to be more women friendly.
Check it out!
Feminism does not mean you need to override men on all counts or counter whatever a man does. It just means you need to be yourself, rise on occasions when you are being oppressed, and assert your independence, including your freedom of movement, thoughts and dreams and make your voice heard and valued in a highly men-centric society. .
Feminism is not synonymous to shedding clothes. Feminism should not be identified with how much you are ready to strip, but how confident you are about what you wear, what your personality is, or what your choices are. Of course, nobody has the right to question what you wear or how much you wear, but that is not feminism but part of your personality that you portray for yourself as well as for your beholders.
During the recent uproar created by the picture of Deepika Padukone’s cleavage by TOI, many feminists took on the responsibility of defending Deepika and claimed that it was against women’s empowerment. Personally, I believe that ‘private parts’ are meant to be kept private. However, in the South, around the 19th century, it was considered immodest for women of lower castes to cover their breasts, and by a revolt (the Channar revolt), this right to cover one’s breasts was obtained by our predecessors.
I would definitely agree with Deepika Padukone regarding the cheap journalistic gimmick the national daily played to increase their ever sagging circulation. Another one on similar lines was seen recently in India Today, with the headline Kim Kardashian flaunts her assets with a conspicuous picture of half of her breasts. But I would say that it is a different topic entirely, worth discussing, and questioning the very journalistic intent behind the whole debacle.
For example, if a male star forgot to lock his fly, the same journalists would probably run from corner to corner to get a picture and turn it into a scoop! So it is a question of infringement of privacy rights and the degradation of journalistic values, rather than women’s empowerment.
Feminism and dependent status do not go well
Let us not sail under false colors and invoke our feminist urges only when it is convenient for us. If you believe in feminism please do not expect your better half to open the door for you or hold the chair for you while you carefully fit your feminist bum in there.
Learn to do your own stuff rather than depend too much on your spouse or other men in your life before claiming your once-in-a-while active feminist bones.
Men can’t be feminists
If you wish that your mother is more than a maid who cooks for you, your sister needs more respect and love in her in-laws’ household or your wife to have all the happiness that you yourselves have, then Congratulations – you are a feminist too!
One look at a girl and the men come to the conclusion she is a feminist. Sorry guys, but we do not come with a dress code. Feminists come in all shapes and sizes, whether fully or scantily clad.
Feminists are rude with no regard to moral values
Again, wrong! Speaking one’s mind is often misunderstood as being rude, and asserting one’s rights without inhibition as to what others might think is misconstrued as devoid of moral values. Those feminists may be personalities who hail moral values and ethics on a much higher footing than you.
But maybe the word ‘feminine’ itself is the main aspect that drives men away from the thought that it is exclusively for women’s rights.
A legal consultant, settled in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; my first love is and has
I have to disagree about feminism not being about the right to roam semi naked. For a variety of reasons, I absolutely believe that feminism is about the right to be semi naked.
Thanks for your honest comment Bhagwad. My take is , to DRESS UP the way one wants is a personal choice and a matter of individual freedom. And I do personally feel nobody has the right to question it and no one is obliged to accept anyone’s dictate on their way of dressing.. But that is part of our personality and it surely cannot be taken as a license or invitation to be leched upon…
But it fails my logic how “NUDITY” can be a factor at all for attaining ‘equality’ or ‘women empowerment’… Is that all feminism all about? The sad fact is today, so many women have reduced feminism to be just a platform to raise this “freedom to strip ” or “protest nude..” That i definitely consider a deplorable situation. Because I believe feminism can be invoked for a number of significant reasons to bring about REAL gender equality in the society….
I think for me, it’s a question for equality. Women need to have the same freedom that men have to walk around half clothed. As long as people don’t question men but do the same for women, we have a problem that needs to be addressed. And that will eventually lead to a discussion about how women are viewed, their “proper” role etc etc. So you see – the issue about being semi naked seems trivial at first. Until we begin to ask fundamental questions about how society treats women differently from men.
And isn’t that a central issue for feminism to solve?
Got your point ! Let me clarify , that in this post I am not targeting the good part of the society, Bhagwad 🙂
I am a woman who wears almost all kinds of modern dresses and I totally relate to what you say. I guess by meaning ‘semi nude’ you refer to the same… ! I definitely agree that if a woman is unnecessarily objectified, we should hold hands to question the same…and in fact all my previous posts speaks as such…
But in this particular post , I target only those women who support unnecessary exposure/nudity; as I firmly believe there is only a narrow line between ‘right exposure’ and vulgarity/nudity… and i target only those who profess the latter as feminism… As my post says , i stand to the point that private parts ought to be kept private (solely my personal opinion) !!
Thank you so much for taking time off and giving your valuable opinion…
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Sign in/Register & Get personalised recommendations