Shaking Things Up A Bit Is More Fun Now Than Ever Before! And you win exciting prizes.
Want to be a freelance writer? Join the Women’s Web workshop at Mumbai, Gurgaon & Bangalore!
Married women can also take care of their parents according to the Bombay High court. A step towards women’s equality. Read to know more.
In a landmark judgement upheld by the Bombay High Court – A married woman too is responsible for maintaining her parents. This is by far the most righteous step towards women’s equality. It is not always about demanding rights, but doing our duties too.
The Bombay High court has said that a married daughter too should share the responsibility of her parents. In a particular case of Vasant vs. Govindrao Upasrao Naik, Criminal Revision Application No. 172/2014, the High Court rejected the pre-conceived notion that a married daughter has obligations only towards her husband’s family and not her own parents.
Check out Mederma!
With this judgement, many age old notions will be broken
Many people still prefer educating boys over girls, as they see them as their providers. This will help break the bias and encourage parents to educate their girls.
It will also help in negating the belief of daughters being ‘Paraya Dhan’ (belonging to somebody else’s family) and thus not taking money from them.
It puts a stand in the society that-if after marriage girl becomes a part of her husband’s family that does not imply she has left her parents’ family.
This judgement encourages women to be financially independent not just for themselves but for their parents too.
With a girl no more being a burden, hopefully the practice of dowry and female infanticide will reduce.
Most importantly, it does away with gender defined roles.
Kudos to this judgement!!
Published here earlier.
Image Source: Pixabay
A software engineer ,who loves to travel.A writer by heart.
Pingback: Legally Making Women Responsible | thoughtsongo
It is not about equality. Married or not married one must take care of parents.
Yes…exactly the point the cou rt is trying to make…
its a good decision.. but married women who is independent should also share the same with her husband and husband’s family. It is not like husband should do everything for her wife and wife resources should go to only her family. Here comes the married women thinking not to be biased.
well said… equality should be both sided and not single sided…
It should be both side.Both the partners should support each others family .
The judgement did not say married woman’s resources should go only to her parents. It said married woman can also take care of her parents just like any man does if she wishes to. I don’t see why people don’t get it. It’s a simple judgement that gives women a little more freedom in supporting her parents as well apart from her own family (her husband and kids). Plus, why it is always expected from a woman to support her inlaws all the time when her husband is there to do that. Does a man put the same amount of efforts in supporting her wife’s family as much as she puts? Why can’t we make life simpler for women by not pressuring them so much all the time.
I don’t think this is equality…I think married women should be equally responsible to in-laws while married man should as well be equally responsible for his in-laws, that is equality…Whether you are a girl or a boy you need to be responsible for your parents, when a court demands her to be responsible for his parents by law, then same law should demand him to be responsible for her parents as well…Then we can call it equality.
Parents are not objects that need to be maintained. They are to be taken care of. Please feel free to write in Hindi if your English is poor, as bad choice of words can be disrespectful.
@Ramya ,Unfortunately in our society a daughter is not expected to take care of her parents and neither is son-in-law. There are cases where all the earnings of a women are used by the husband and in-laws. I do feel a judgement like this helps and is a step towards equality.
@Vikram..Thanks for pointing out the mistake which even the editor could not. The problem is my Hindi is poorer than my English :).I had no intention of portraying parents as an object.Apologies if you found it disrespectful.
Best decision taken…
An unmarried daughter above 18 can claim maintenance from father, but an unmarried son above 18 cannot. This law also need to be changed.
Insane logics. Comments. Every individual has to take care of their parents irrespective of gender. But case to case basis it varies. If there are 2 brothers and any one of them takes care of the parents, it is all mutually agreed b/w them and as long as the parents are comfortable being with, they can be in the care of anyone of their son. equality, it is not that both sons has to give equal amount of money or time. It’s all about how they can treat them respectfully and take care of them whenever in need. In todays world, most girls think that their parents are only humans to be taken care off. You cannot find any equality here in taking care of your parents.
And few females still talking about dowry & female infanticide. Today few girls will not go for the second child if the 1st one is boy ‘coz they feel they are more comfortable with boy. what I say these females who shouts for equality is plz be a one what you claim for today. Give birth to female even if your 1st is boy. Grow you boy in such a way he will not expect anything from a girl and her family when he marries. take that as your responsibility rather barking simply at men.
If A Judge Needs To Empower Daughters To Support Parents, We Know Something Is Wrong Here!
Dowry… Or No? [#ShortStory]
Is Our Society Progressing Or Putrefying With Respect To Women?
Why Does Our Law ‘Allow’ Marital Rape Just Because A Girl Is Over 15?
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Sign in/Register & Get personalised recommendations