Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
The Triple Talaq bill was passed last week amid much acclaim, but the criminalisation provisions within the bill have generated disagreement as well.
On 30th July 2019, the Rajya Sabha passed the The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019 which was the much debated Triple Talaq Bill. With this, both houses of Parliament have passed the Bill, making it possible for the Bill to become part of the law.
The Bill calls for the criminalisation of pronouncing triple talaq as a cognizable, non-bailable offence with imprisonment up to three years along with a fine.
The bill has been a topic of discussion for a very long time. Now after it was passed with a majority of 99 people who voted in favour of the bill, there are several questions being raised.
Is the bill essential to secure the rights of Muslim women or is it a game of vote bank politics, and why was it important to make a civil offence like divorce a criminal offence only for one community?
The legal journey against Triple Talaq started in 2015 when a SC bench asked the Chief Justice of India to set up an appropriate bench to examine if Muslim women face gender discrimination in cases of divorce, while dealing with a case of Hindu succession. The idea of women being discriminated moved to the practice of ‘Triple talaq’ in February 2016 when Supreme Court asked the former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi for assistance on appeals challenging constitutional validity of “Triple Talaq”, “nikah halala” and “polygamy”.
After a lot of debate from within the community and also among political parties, in August 2017 the Supreme Court set aside the practice of instant triple talaq saying it was violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. It also asked Centre to frame a law.
Now after getting the judgement from the apex court the Modi Government drafted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill. They proposed it in the Lok Sabha which then passed Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017. This bill made the practice of triple talaq a punishable offence with a prison term of maximum three years.
There, then, were attempts made to pass the bill in the Rajya Sabha. These attempts faced a lot of criticism from the opposition parties and in the midst of it, in September, the cabinet cleared an ordinance with which Triple Talaq became punishable offence with a three year jail term.
The opposition asked for multiple amendments in the bill, and demanded a ‘scrutiny’ of the bill by the select panel in the Rajya Sabha.
In its new attempt after assuming its second term in June 2019, the Government tabled The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019 (triple talaq bill) in both houses of Parliament. In July amid protests and walkouts by the opposition the bill was passed in both houses.
Shayara Bano, a 2016 petitioner in the Instant Talaq case in Supreme Court thanked Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for passing the Triple Talaq Bill.
“Whole Muslim community should be happy. Those who were opposing the Bill & creating obstacles should understand that it’s for the good of society & women. I thank RS Prasad ji & Modi ji for their support,” she said in an interview to ANI.
Many politicians like Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sushma Swaraj and Smriti Irani also applauded what they termed as a historic step taken by the government.
However, not everyone is equally pleased.
Why don’t we evaluate the major points of this bill?
The opposition on the other hand criticised the bill on certain issues. According to the Congress, there was no need to criminalise the offence.
“We had fundamentally supported this Bill. We also wanted amendment for the provision of support to Muslim women. Our opposition was on two-three issues. The Supreme Court had struck down triple talaq, you had also struck down triple talaq through law, then what is the need to criminalise an imaginary thing?” said Congress Leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi.
The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaddudin Owaisi slammed the BJP for the bill. According to him, “It’s a big injustice against Muslim women. Triple Talaq is indeed a crime. It is a social evil, but the bill that was passed today will lead to more abandonment of the Muslim Women”
The bill is considered to be a move for women empowerment but there are many other aspects to it too. The main question that arises here is the need of making a civil offence a criminal offence for one particular community. Practices like triple talaq that give men the right to abandon their wives and use them as property are unjust and should be outlawed.
The issue here is that if divorce is a matter of civil offence for all other communities, why is it a criminal offence for Muslims? This raises the sceptre of the Bill possibly being used to criminalise more men from the community.
In summary, while most people agree that outlawing of Triple Talaq is in itself a huge step in our democracy, criminalisation as a part of the bill has generated much discussion and disagreement as well.
I read, I write, I dream and search for the silver lining in my life. Being a student of mass communication with literature and political science I love writing about things that bother me. Follow read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
I recommend reading Manjiri Indurkar's Origami Aai alongside her memoir to have a fulfilling and enriching experience of telling one's story with grace.
It’s All In Your Head, M famed author Manjiri Indurkar’s debut poetry collection, Origami Aai, is independent and yet an extension of her memoir in which she speaks with utmost grace about all forms of abuses that she has survived. In this book of intriguing and evocative poems, the poet weaves words to form images of the everyday life of her middle-class family, love found and lost, trauma, and healing.
The collection is divided into four segments, beginning with the family, slowly moving towards the world, and finally colliding them together.
We aren’t in mourning, but we are creatures of habit.
So we talk of each one who died of drowning,
and I listen to her stories with the patience
of a chronicler.
– Funereal Stories
Indian students dream of studying abroad, but these deaths and the racism we feel ask the question - are we travelling there to only lose our lives?
Trigger warning: This speaks of racism and death of Indian students, and may be triggering to survivors.
Today morning while I was on my way to the office, I was scrolling Instagram and immediately my eyes got stuck on a post having the headline, “US Policeman ran over an Indian Student in Seattle”. Jaahnavi Kandula, a 23-year-old Northeast University Graduate student from Andhra Pradesh was struck and killed in January this year by a Seattle cop, Kevin Dave, while driving 74 mph on the way to a report of an overdose call.”
Further, I read that the investigating agency while watching the body-worn camera that captured the whole incident, were laughing and joking about the death and commented that her life had “limited value”. If the deceased had been a US citizen, would they have behaved in the similar way, I feel not?
Please enter your email address