Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
The family went on to appeal to the Supreme Court and the SC bench of justices Kant and Viswanathan has made some of the most powerful observations in this case.
Photo by Manoj Kulkarni on Unsplash
A woman in Uttarakhand lost her life in a motor accident. Her husband and minor son were compensated with Rs 2.5 lakhs by a motor accident claims tribunal. When the family appealed to the High Court for a higher compensation their plea was dismissed because the HC justified the Rs 2.5 lakhs compensation that was fixed basis her life expectancy and a bare minimum notional income.
The family went on to appeal to the Supreme Court and the SC bench of justices Kant and Viswanathan has made some of the most powerful observations in this case. Acknowledging a homemaker’s time and effort in running a home, the bench increased the compensation to Rs 6 lakhs maintaining that a homemaker’s income is difficult to compute in monetary terms and should not be considered less significant to that of an earning member.
Why are we as a society so dismissive of a woman’s contribution in running a home and nurturing a family?
Whether a woman steps out of home to earn a living or works from home to earn a living the primary ownership of running a household has always been hers. This responsibility was all the more assumed if she did not have a source of income. Let us also not forget that in a patriarchal society many women even in today’s day and age are forbidden to be financially independent. There is this notion that a man’s income is enough, putting an unreasonable burden on men to be sole earning members.
This order by the Supreme Court will hopefully change the way homemakers are perceived and bring their contributions the needed and long overdue acknowledgment, respect and value.
Life happens, everyday. Of everyday life stories. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address