If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Women can now appear for the National Defence Academy (NDA) exam! Supreme Court says banning women's enrolment is rooted in "gender discrimination."
Women can now appear for the National Defence Academy (NDA) exam! Supreme Court says banning women’s enrolment is rooted in “gender discrimination.”
Dismissing the Union government’s assertion that the ban on women training at the Pune-based NDA was a policy issue, the Supreme Court stated in its order, “This is a policy decision based on gender discrimination.”
The Supreme Court also mentioned the army’s attitude toward women’s equality. The court said that they expect the Army and the government to consider taking a more constructive view on the matter.
The Supreme Court panel voiced its displeasure with the Indian Army’s ‘mindset’ if it comes to equal service prospects for men and women in the country’s armed services. The court said this while considering a complaint brought by lawyer Kush Kalra for equal opportunity for women at the NDA and the Indian Naval Academy.
As Indian organizations progress toward gender equality, the armed services, particularly the Army, have lagged behind. Therefore, the government’s announcement, regarding a public interest litigation petition filed in the Supreme Court, that it was not opposed to women attending military academies such as the National Defence Academy is a positive initiative. It is a game-changer in achieving equality.A
According to the latest Supreme Court verdict, women will have equal chances and advantages as their male colleagues in terms of benefits, ranks, pensions, and the ability to operate for longer periods in government.
Senior male officers say they are not opposed to more women joining the military and even moving into combat positions, but at the same time, they identified a host of reasons why it’s not feasible.
For example, male troops do not accept women in leadership roles, women soldiers are vulnerable to sexual harassment, and there is a shortage of infrastructures like segregated sleeping quarters and restrooms for women.
Several major generals spoke about the enormous amount of resources that would be required to make the military more gender-inclusive. He was also concerned that women officers might seek benefits, such as easier tasks which could create animosity amongst their colleagues.
There is a societal hesitation among males in accepting female physical resilience in battle as equal to that of men. As a result of their physical abilities, they feel they have an advantage over women.
The complaints originate from the male-dominated establishment’s reluctance to tolerate more women entering the stronghold. Gender bias in military services can be a hurdle in the aspirations of India to be the growing powerhouse in the future.
Transfers and maternity leaves are examples of institutional and administrative rules that must be preserved and viewed positively from period to period. There ought to be a change in India’s approach to women, which will aid general economic growth, female empowerment, and present India in a favourable light in the international arena.
Referring to a Verdict in February 2020 that gave women ‘short service commission officers’ the same opportunities as their male counterparts for permanent commission in 10 army branches.
“The issue of discrimination against women in the recruitment policies of the Indian Army has reached finality, and nothing survives,” the affidavit said. There seems to be no restriction of privilege or opportunity to women who want to join the Indian Army as officers and who meet the requisite qualifications and are considered suitable.
On February 17 and March 25, the Indian Army women officers won two rounds of legal struggle in Supreme Court decisions. The true ‘conflict’ is a search for ‘Equality of Opportunity,’ which the government is obligated to support under the Constitution.
According to the latest verdict, women will have equal chances and advantages as their male colleagues in terms of benefits, ranks, pensions, and the ability to operate for longer periods in government.
It will need a favourable tidal societal shift for women’s empowerment, gender equality, and national security to develop a successful India.
Physical contact in wars is inevitable and should not be an excuse for gender discrimination.
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
I believe in conveying emotions and sometimes a strong opinion. I am a part-time writer and poet. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: