Over the years, your support has made Women’s Web the leading resource for women in India. Now, it is our turn to ask, how can we make this even more useful for you? Please take our short 5 minute questionnaire – your feedback is important to us!
What did HUL achieve by replacing the word 'Fair' with 'Glow'? Indian women come in all skin tones, and maybe it's high time the messaging for all the cosmetic products changes.
What did HUL achieve by replacing the word ‘Fair’ with ‘Glow’? Indian women come in all skin tones, and maybe it’s high time the messaging for all the cosmetic products changes.
This whole hullabaloo about HUL renaming the word ‘Fair’ with the word ‘Glow’ for its money-spinning product ‘Fair & Lovely’ is unwarranted and frankly spells doom for the millions of people whose confidence comes from comparing skin tones and heaving a sigh of relief when theirs comes off lighter. Nobody is sparing a thought for these souls who propel themselves to success solely on the basis of this distinction.
Indian women of the current generation and all previous generations have held on to the fact that a fairer skin tone was a trump card that you pull out of the bag when all other things were equal.
I remember a conversation with a Sindhi friend of mine with skin as white as milk, sadly shaking her head when the size zero fad was becoming the rage.
She said and I quote: “Before, in my mother’s time even if you were a ball of maida it would do, now the maida ball has to be shaped like a figure 8.” We both burst out laughing but I’m sure that if I meet her today she would say “Now the shapely figure 8 maida is required to glow? What next? They need to produce electricity? ….where does it all end?”
Renaming of the word ‘Fair’ seems unnecessary when the underlying message and the ingredients remain the same. ‘Glow & Lovely’ just seems like a covert operation name’ instead they can name it ‘Sunny & Lovely’.
Nothing is ‘whiter’ than the sun so the messaging that you will turn blindingly fair will be crystal clear. No need for a shade card with this name and all the other horrendous ads that ‘Fair & Lovely’ came with. Just rope in Sunny Leone, and you can even withdraw your brother product – the ‘Glow & Handsome’ cream, as you can cover your entire customer base with just one ad and one cream.
But jokes apart, we all know ‘A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet’. Therefore a whitening cream by another name would always work on doing just that – white-washing.
The demand for a brighter skin tone will continue, and you cannot blame women who pounce on the latest whitening creams to give them an (perceived) edge in these competitive times.
Maybe HUL can remove the ‘Lovely’ from ‘Fair & Lovely” and just keep it ‘Fair’. Now that would be fair messaging – simple and honest! Equating ‘Lovely’ with the word ‘Fair’ is what is more offensive than the word ‘Fair’ itself.
Indian women come in all skin tones, and maybe it’s high time the messaging for all the cosmetic products changes. Crappy advertising is more to blame than the product itself. Leave it to the woman to choose what hue she wants, and trust her to make the right choice.
Images source: still from the films Bala and Dum Laga Ke Haisha
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Roopa Prabhakar describes herself as a mother, a working woman, a closet feminist and blogger. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Most of us dislike being called aunty because of the problematic meanings attached to it. But isn't it time we accept growing old with grace?
Recently, during one of those deep, thoughtful conversations with my 3 y.o, I ended a sentence with “…like those aunty types.” I quickly clicked my tongue. I changed the topic and did everything in my hands to make her forget those last few words.
I sat down with a cup of coffee and drilled myself about how the phrase ‘aunty-type’ entered my lingo. I have been hearing this word ‘aunty’ a lot these days, because people are addressing me so.
Almost a year ago, I was traveling in a heavily-crowded bus and a college girl asked me “Aunty, can you please hold my bag?” It was the first time and I was first shocked and later offended. Then I thought about why I felt so.
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 might have had a box office collection of 260 crores INR and entertained Indian audiences, but it's full of problematic stereotypes.
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 starts with a scene in which the protagonist, Ruhaan (played by Kartik Aaryan) finds an abandoned pink suitcase in a moving cable car and thinks there was a bomb inside it.
Just then, he sees an unknown person (Kiara Advani) wave and gesture at him to convey that the suitcase was theirs. Ruhaan, with the widest possible smile, says, “Bomb mai bag nahi hai, bomb ka bag hai,” (There isn’t a bomb in the bag, the bag belongs to a bomb).
Who even writes such dialogues in 2022?