Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
Women in the armed forces too can now expect to be kept away from command positions because they "won't be accepted by male troops" and "it will interfere with their domestic obligations"!
Women in the armed forces too can now expect to be kept away from command positions because they “won’t be accepted by male troops” and “it will interfere with their domestic obligations”!
In a sexist, highly regressive move, the Centre has told the Supreme Court that women officers are not suitable for command posts in the Army because the male officers are not willing to accept them.
“The composition of rank & file being male, and predominantly drawn from rural background, with prevailing societal norms, the troops are not yet mentally schooled to accept women officers in command,” the affidavit cited.
The stance, that reeks of benevolent sexism, is that male and female officers cannot be treated at par. It stated that women have “domestic obligations” to fulfill, and that a situation of grave physical, mental and psychological stress will be induced if a female officer is taken in as a prisoner of war. The challenges of “confinement, motherhood, and childcare” was mentioned.
This new announcement, once again, reduces women to their domestic avatars, where they are expected to put their family and home before themselves.
The move is highly sexist and regressive. The fact that men are not willing to take in women shows how sexism is rampant even in the Army. The role of the Centre is not to reinforce this sexism but to reduce or remove it.
Women have handled home and their work efficiently. The urban woman of today juggles both her professional life and personal life like a boss. Citing this reason and not allowing women to join in is a move to curb the freedom which women have the constitutional right to. Progressive rule enforcements is the need.
Priya Jhingan was one of the first 25 women to have joined the Army as an officer in 1993. In the recent times, we have the example of the exemplary Mitali Madhumita. She is the first woman officer to receive a gallantry award, and the Sena Medal in 2011 for her brave efforts shown during the attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul in 2010, and the operations in Jammu and Kashmir, and the northeastern states. We also have Divya Ajith Kumar as an example who led the women troop of 154 women officers in the Republic Day Parade of 2015. She is also the first woman officer to be honoured with the Sword of Honour.
Indian Air Force had 13.09% and 8.5%, Indian Navy 6% and 2.8% women, and Indian Army 3.80% and 3% in December 2018 and December 2014 respectively. And these are just the command positions of combat. There are also other divisions of the armed forces, not just combat. Women have, for example, also held command positions and proven themselves in the medical division of the armed forces.
When power packed women as those mentioned above and many more have laid down such great examples, it is surprising to see how the authorities do not see women as fit for holding command posts. In times when feminists are trying to bridge this gap, moves like these are designed to derail.
Feminism does not seek that women be treated as superior to men. It simply seeks that women be seen as equals, and to be treated at par. The need of the hour is to stop viewing women as liabilities, but as human beings who are equal.
Image source: YouTube
A Journalism student. When not busy with college and assignments, I read a lot. Big time foodie and dog mom. Pop culture, feminism and news gets me excited. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address