If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Anurag Kashyap and Co's company Phantom Films was dissolved recently, as firing partner Vikas Bahl for misconduct was not a clause included in their partnership contract. What does it say about how we prioritise 'business' over women?
Anurag Kashyap and Co’s company Phantom Films was dissolved recently, as firing partner Vikas Bahl for misconduct was not a clause included in their partnership contract. What does it say about how we prioritise ‘business’ over women?
Phantom films – that ‘edgy’ Bollywood production house set up by directors Vikas Bahl, Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane and producer Madhu Mantena, the one that made all those path-breaking and emancipating movies we loved…turns out that this ‘progressive’ firm did not have the option in their contracts for ‘firing partners over sexual misconduct’.
The victim who was an employee at the time, came out in the open and accused Vikas Bahl, Director of Queen, of sexually assaulting her, after spending many agonising years in therapy. It helped that Kangana Ranaut spoke up too. Of course, Anurag Kashyap of Udta Punjab, Manmarziyaan and Sacred Games fame knew all about it. The victim had spoken to him privately. Yet, he chose the path of ‘do-nothing’. The company was dissolved a couple of days back when Vikas Bahl was finally in the dock.
At the end of it all, it is just business – pure economics. Money matters! And How! Bahl wasn’t just an employee who could be terminated. He was the partner who brought in movies and controlled the company to the same extent as the rest of them.
Even in the case of employees, why do firms find it difficult to terminate the services of the transgressors? It’s due to their monetary value or utility value to the company which obviously will outweigh the social brownie points. Or the cost of finding an equally qualified employee who will eventually bring in the same returns after the mandatory time delay. These losses are again far more countable than just a pat on the back for having done the right thing. Social standing is insignificant compared to soaring balance sheets.
The final nail in the coffin is making the victim accountable for the loss of revenue in case she presses ahead for justice. Because justice could involve the firing of the said employee or even dissolving companies. Thereby she is considered responsible for the loss of jobs for people unconnected with her personal trauma and uninvested in it.
As for the alleged perpetrators and those who enabled them – your sitting on the truth for years and then take to Twitter or Facebook to issue wishy-washy ‘sorries’ is so lame. That doesn’t help in healing. Rather than adopting a “Yeh toh chalta hai, that this happens all around, forget and move on as livelihoods are at stake” attitude, you need to see how you can contribute to a safer workplace ecosystem for women to thrive.
More skeletons are tumbling out, as women are finally speaking up by gathering courage from the many sordid tales emerging. One hopes that the men who are now showing some circumspection will not go back to being silent spectators and ‘business as usual’.
Anupama Jain is the author of * ‘When Padma Bani Paula', listed as 'One of the 5 best books of 2018 - Fiction', by readwriteinspire.com. It is a breezy novel about second chances of life and read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: