Women’s Web is recognizing role models with WICA, and number of women nominating for the Women In Corporate Awards is increasing. Apply now, last date – 18th July
Bigotry in the form of sexism, casteism, racism, or any other ‘ism’ needs to be tackled by understanding the insecurities behind these beliefs, not just by calling it out.
Bigotry is on the rise in some parts of the world. Be it in the form of racism, sexism, religious intolerance or something else. People are becoming more comfortable with publicly expressing harsh hostile opinions directed against certain groups.
On the other hand there is panic among those who have grown up to despise bigotry as well as among the targets of bigotry. Such people are worried about an increasingly intolerant world where they already are or eventually might be victims. This reminds me of a famous poem:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
The above poem calls for people to speak up against bigotry before it is too late. It asks people to stand up against injustice even when it does not, directly, affect them, because intolerance can only increase in it’s exclusivity and some day will affect everybody. Others claim that silence or neutrality is passive compliance, summarised in the catchy phrase, “If you are not with us, you are against us.” Call a spade a spade says Thomas Essel.
But what good does it do the call a spade a spade? Will calling a spade a spade, change a spade to a heart? Probably not. When attacked or insulted, people usually become defensive and respond in anger and dig their heels even further. So, by calling a spade a spade, it is most likely, that we are increasing the probability of the spade continuing to remain a spade.
I am not proposing that it is pointless to fight bigotry. Absolutely not! I am just suggesting that a more effective strategy needs to be employed, than mere name calling.
It might help to control our righteous anger, and try to understand the cause of bigotry in the particular case, and address it. For example people tend to be most bigoted when they feel threatened or insecure. Those insecurities must be addressed not just in abstract terms of the overall economy or ethics but in ways that might help them overcome their personal fears.
Logic does not always work, especially when assumptions and priorities are different. However an appeal to empathy, whilst showing empathy may be a way to start. People’s opinions can rarely be changed overnight and patience is the key. Engaging in constructive discussion, acknowledging grey areas and working through practical issues that cause fear and insecurity, are all steps in the right direction.
Also an effort can be made to separate the general and the specific. Human beings have a tendency to extrapolate from small sample sizes of personal experiences. We remember the experiences with stronger impact better. So normal, expected, or even mildly pleasant interactions are often forgotten while bitter ones leave a lasting impression skew our extrapolations. So when someone takes to bigotry because they are smarting from a bad experience, it may help to remind them of previous pleasant or normal interactions they have shared with other people from the same group. Personal stories strike an emotional chord and can bring back much needed perspective.
Religious groups are typically heterogeneous with different people following various religious customs and practices to different degrees. Almost every religion has age old practices which are considered archaic and even inhuman today. Today, a religion is usually criticized for it’s most extreme practices which are only followed by a small fraction of its followers.
However bigotry against a particular religion tends to paint all the people belonging to that religion with the same broad brush stroke of extremism. Moderate or open-minded practitioners of the religion get upset with repeatedly being considered monsters or fools. Eventually out of frustration or lack of available compromises they identify with the extremists, thereby increasing the number of extremists. Counterproductive and self fulfilling!
Bigotry is despising an entire category of people who share a single characteristic or belief, often by accident of birth. Sometimes it is because of disconcerting differentness of the appearance or customs typical of the group. It may be possible to overcome this type of bigotry through regular exposure to individuals from the despised group, and slowly growing to like some of those individuals thus humanizing the group rather than thinking of them as an abstraction.
Sometimes bigotry arises from threatening situations like a large influx of refugees or extremist violent organizations that claim to be the voice of a much larger group. In this case too, association with individuals from the group helps separate the problem from the people and then one can focus one’s energy on finding a constructive solution to the problem rather than despising a whole category of people.
Become a premium user on Women’s Web and get access to exclusive content for women, plus useful Women’s Web events and resources in your city.
Published here earlier.
Image source: flickr
Kanika G, a physicist by training and a mother of 2 girls, started writing to
A very good post Kanika! It really makes one think and is an important topic for our times. One feels so overwhelmed at times when confronted with the hyper nationalist, hyper religious, hyper sexual, hyper materialistic aspects of our modern lives, institutions, thoughts and actions. The wisdom of the ancient philosophers time and again urges us to live life in moderation. Yet it seems increasingly difficult to follow this wisdom in times where one’s identity seems to hinge on such extremes. Like you rightly point out engaging in constructive discussion is surely the need of the hour. But…watching modern media houses and their style of discussion makes me acutely aware of how little we can actually hope for…
Thanks Sonia. I agree. It is depressing that social media and MSM has reduced complex debates to either you are with us or against us, thus dividing people and perpetrating hatred. Few people seem inclined to indulge in meaningful discussion. Its become all about punchlines, rhetoric rather than finding helpful, not so glamorous, long term solutions. Anger and venom seems to be boiling over.
Still each of us can make an effort to not be sucked in to it. Each of us who strongly believe in moderation and consideration can stick to our principles in these tough times. I have found it hard to do too, but every time I have succeeded it felt really good. It may make little difference or it may make a lot of difference but we can have the satisfaction of knowing that we tried our best.
Watch: Nandita Das Tells Us, “This Is Not A Time To Be Silent”
AIB Roast: Pushing The Envelope Of Free Speech Or Just Bigotry?
This Is No Nation For Women; Can You Imagine The Violence In These Women’s Lives?
Women And Sexual Minorities In India Get Pathetic Mental Health Care. Why? Bigotry!
Get our weekly mailer and never miss out on the best reads by and about women!