Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
This bride asked for a toilet as dowry from her parents. But does that make the underlying concept of dowry any more palatable?
Half the country is going gaga over an incident that happened in Maharashtra, when a bride refused any other gift from her parents apart from a movable, ready to install toilet. Apparently, she had no idea that the family she is getting married into, doesn’t have one. So, when she came to know about this shitty (quite, literally!) situation, the lady put forward the condition and rightly so. But, I can’t help but see this incident with dowry tinted glasses and I am not proud of it, unlike those calling this women’s empowerment. This, my dear friends, is not women’s empowerment.
The basic issue here is that there are still many homes in rural India which don’t have a functional toilet. I am ashamed that I have to write this about my country, even in 2015. But, it’s a harsh reality which we have to accept with a pinch of salt. Vidya Balan has been shouting out loud about the issue but little has changed.
While I am not qualified to comment on how to tackle the situation, I know that it would take much more than just a campaign. Also, apart from the lack of funds, I can’t seem to fathom any other reason why a home would not have a toilet. The family in question here didn’t have a toilet but they had a son and hence they knew that they were entitled to a dowry.
The difference is that this time, the bride wasn’t a mute spectator to the whole affair and that is the only positive that I see in the whole situation. Apart from that, there is nothing new. Where is women’s empowerment when guests at weddings find a very unusual gift i.e. a toilet being displayed apart from other household articles that were given to the bride by her family and relatives? Imagine, the girl had to ask her parents to install a toilet today; tomorrow she might be forced to ask her father to build a bathroom, or repair the kitchen, or build another room. I can’t stress the fact enough, that to me, this is just plain old dowry, only in a different form.
It would have been a different matter altogether if the lady had refused to get married into such a family, or if the groom’s family bore the cost of the toilet, or if there were no ‘usual gifts’ displayed at the wedding. But, that would have been a fairytale wedding in the rural Indian context. And fairytales are reserved for the elite class of India; they don’t happen in places where sons are treated better than daughters.
Sulabh International awarded the bride a sum of Rs.10 lakhs for standing up and demanding the exact thing she needs in her wedding trousseau. So much to get it trending in a nation which has an attention span of less than 15 seconds. The sanitation expert announced this award and claimed that this young bride has inspired many. So, the rural population would now delay building a toilet in their homes until their sons reach a marriageable age and claim a toilet for dowry. What a solution!
Another point to ponder that arises in my mind is that the award money would now be the undisputed property of the in-laws, without doing anything at all. It won’t be used to pay back the girl’s parents for whatever ‘gifts’ they have given the bride, because, well, they were just gifts, including a Rs.12000 toilet. So, all in all, the in-laws are richer, have a brand new toilet and a daughter-in-law they know they can meddle with and force to bring ‘gifts’ from her parents.
My only hope against hope now is that not all of this is true and that the in-laws dealt with the situation in a manner which does not promote dowry. But, getting realistic , that’s almost impossible. India, you really are incredible!
Floral garlands image via Shutterstock
A software engineer, a realist, and a cribber by the day. A chef, a writer, and a dreamer, by the night! read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address