Check out the ultimate guide to 16 return-to-work programs in India for women
Irom Chanu Sharmila exemplifies the transformative impact that women can have in society when they choose to stand up and protest.
In the northeastern state of Manipur, India, there exists a story of remarkable determination and unwavering resolve. It is the story of Irom Chanu Sharmila, a woman whose life embodies courage and sacrifice, earning her the moniker, “The Iron Lady of Manipur.”
Born in 1972 in Imphal, Manipur, Sharmila’s early life was far from privileged. Her family’s modest means were overshadowed by the political turmoil that gripped the region. Her journey, however, took an extraordinary turn in November 2000, when Manipur was scarred by the tragic Malom Massacre. This incident, where ten innocent lives were lost, would serve as the catalyst for an unwavering commitment that would span over a decade and a half.
On November 5, 2000, Sharmila embarked on a hunger strike, a solemn pledge to abstain from sustenance until the draconian Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) was repealed. This colonial-era law granted virtual impunity to Indian military personnel stationed in Manipur, fostering an environment marred by human rights violations.
Sharmila’s resolve, grounded in the principles of non-violence, transformed her into a symbol of resistance. Her arduous journey, punctuated by force-feedings and imprisonment, would test the limits of human endurance and dedication.
Irom Chanu Sharmila lives an extraordinary life, one that transcends adjectives and extols the virtues of courage, resilience, and the indomitable spirit of a woman who dares to challenge the status quo in pursuit of justice.’
It is not just a recounting of her life’s milestones; it is a journey into the heart of a woman who fought tirelessly for a cause she believed in.
Irom Sharmila grew up in a family of modest means, where every dream was nurtured against the backdrop of economic hardships. The defining moment of her life occurred on a fateful November day in 2000. Manipur, a land marked by ethnic divisions and anti-Indian insurgencies, was in turmoil. The infamous Malom Massacre, where ten innocent civilians lost their lives, shook the very foundations of the state.
Sharmila, then a 28-year-old intern with a human rights group, was profoundly affected by the bloodshed she witnessed. She had been documenting cases of alleged abuse by Indian soldiers, listening to the harrowing stories of women who had survived brutal gang rapes and grieving parents who had lost their children to the conflict.
Her heart cried out for justice.
In the wake of the Malom Massacre, she made a life-altering decision. On November 5, 2000, under a clear Manipuri sky, Sharmila began a hunger strike, a vow that she would not break until the draconian Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) was repealed. AFSPA granted virtual immunity from prosecution to Indian military personnel stationed in Manipur, leading to a cycle of violence and human rights abuses.
Her resolve was not born out of anger, but rather, an overwhelming sense of duty to her people and her land. She believed in the power of non-violence and Gandhi’s ideals of peaceful protest. Sharmila embarked on her fast, fully aware of the magnitude of her commitment, and prepared to endure the greatest of sacrifices for the cause she held dear.
Over the course of 5,574 days, Sharmila’s hunger strike would test her mettle, pushing her to the brink of physical and emotional endurance. Force-fed through a nasal tube and imprisoned in a government hospital, she became the face of the struggle against AFSPA. Her unwavering determination earned her international acclaim, with organizations like Amnesty International declaring her a prisoner of conscience and her poster-adorned homes across Manipur.
She became a symbol of peaceful resistance, drawing attention not only from the people of Manipur, but also from human rights activists and organizations worldwide. Her non-violent protest echoed the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, and her steely determination drew parallels with the likes of Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr.
However, Manipuri society was initially perplexed by her audacious undertaking. How could a seemingly ordinary woman from humble beginnings challenge an oppressive law that had persisted for decades? Yet, Sharmila’s resolve remained unbroken, a silent beacon of hope amidst the chaos.
In 2007, Desmond Coutinho, a British-Indian, entered Sharmila’s life.
He had read about her hunger strike and was deeply moved. He began sending her letters and books, sparking a profound connection that transcended geographical boundaries. As their correspondence deepened, a strong bond developed between them, and Sharmila’s heart began to soften.
However, this newfound love was met with resistance from various quarters. The activist mothers who had surrounded Sharmila, as well as some of her family members, raised objections to the relationship. Sharmila’s desire for a normal family life and her deepening relationship with Coutinho led to resentment among those who had once revered her.
In August 2016, Sharmila took a momentous step. She ended her hunger strike, not because her mission was accomplished, but because she realized the need to change her strategy. She recognized that her long fast had captured the world’s attention, but it had not led to the repeal of AFSPA.
Sharmila decided to shift her focus from personal sacrifice to political action. This decision was met with scepticism by some, who believed that her spiritual power required a more extensive infrastructure to translate into political influence. Sharmila, however, remained steadfast in her determination to bring about change through the democratic process.
In the Manipur Legislative Assembly elections of 2017, she launched her political career by forming the People’s Resurgence and Justice Alliance (PRJA) party. Although she did not win a seat, her foray into politics marked a new chapter in her activism. Sharmila chose the path of democracy to continue her battle against AFSPA, aiming to bring about change from within the system.
Today, Irom Chanu Sharmila resides in a flat on the outskirts of Bangalore. Her journey has been marked by sacrifice, love, resistance, and transformation. However, Sharmila has never returned to Manipur, and there is uncertainty about whether she will be welcomed back.
Her journey from a determined hunger striker to a married woman pursuing a different path in life has stirred a range of emotions and opinions.
Irom Chanu Sharmila’s life story is a testament to the power of one woman’s unyielding commitment to justice. Her journey from an ordinary girl to an extraordinary symbol of resistance in Manipur serves as a profound source of inspiration for feminists and civil rights activists worldwide.
It reminds us that even in the face of monumental challenges, the unbreakable spirit of one person can ignite the flames of change and illuminate the path to a better tomorrow.
The “Iron Lady of Manipur” exemplifies the transformative impact that women can have in society when they choose to stand up and challenge the status quo. Sharmila’s enduring legacy reminds us all, especially women, that we have the power to bring about change and that our voices, no matter how small they may seem, can contribute to the greater good.
Image source: The Guardian, Frontline, and Wikipedia, edited on CanvaPro
Hello! I am a feminist and an aspiring journalist. I'm all about dedicating myself to ensure unheard(ignored) and everyday stories of people find a regular place in your feed, through pen or mic; read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
I huffed, puffed and panted up the hill, taking many rest breaks along the way. My calf muscles pained, my heart protested, and my breathing became heavy at one stage.
“Let’s turn back,” my husband remarked. We stood at the foot of Shravanbelagola – one of the most revered Jain pilgrimage centres. “We will not climb the hill,” he continued.
My husband and I were vacationing in Karnataka. It was the month of May, and even at the early hour of 8 am in the morning, the sun scorched our backs. After visiting Bangalore and Mysore, we had made a planned stop at this holy site in the Southern part of the state en route to Hosur. Even while planning our vacation, my husband was very excited at the prospect of visiting this place and the 18 m high statue of Lord Gometeshwara, considered one of the world’s tallest free-standing monolithic statues.
What we hadn’t bargained for was there would be 1001 granite steps that needed to be climbed to have a close-up view of this colossal magic three thousand feet above sea level on a hilltop. It would be an understatement to term it as an arduous climb.
Why is the Social Media trend of young mothers of boys captioning their parenting video “Dear future Daughter-in-Law, you are welcome” deeply problematic and disturbing to me as a young mother of a girl?
I have recently come across a trend on social media started by young mothers of boys who share videos where they teach their sons to be sensitive and understanding and also make them actively participate in household chores.
However, the problematic part of this trend is that such reels or videos are almost always captioned, “To my future daughter-in-law, you are welcome.” I know your intentions are positive, but I would like to point out how you are failing the very purpose you wanted to accomplish by captioning the videos like this.
I know you are hurt—perhaps by a domestic household that lacks empathy, by a partner who either is emotionally unavailable, is a man-child adding to your burden of parenting instead of sharing it, or who is simply backed by overprotective and abusive in-laws who do not understand the tiring journey of a working woman left without any rest as doing the household chores timely is her responsibility only.
Please enter your email address