If you want to understand how to become better allies to people with disabilities, then join us at Embracing All Abilities: Including People with Disabilities at Work.
Social media has its own pros and cons. One of the adverse effect it has had on us was to bring down our book-reading habits!
History tells us that expression in the form of writing has always been central to the human race, from thousands of years ago.
Written language has evolved from pictures of objects, to symbols, to the highly sophisticated languages that we have now, which don’t just convey objects and actions, but ideas and feelings too.
However, writing has acquired a different personality since the onset of the social media age.
When writing was confined to the paper within books, it was about the expression of oneself. One wrote either what they felt strongly about (non-fiction), or where their imagination took them (fiction), or a mix of both. Well, stuff like History, and Economics, and Science were also penned down, but that is something which has not faced the brunt of social media.
In the not so distant past, the turn-over time from an author penning down their thoughts to them reaching the masses was long. It would take however long it would take to write a book, after which it would be published (if a publisher likes the book! There were times when self-publishing was not an option. At least not something which could get your book anywhere).
And then the books would be out for readers to buy, in bookshops. (Oh yeah, no online shopping or e-reading). Apart from some amount of marketing that the books would get, it would be mostly word of mouth that a book is either read or not.
Again, a process which would take its own sweet time.
The path to a book becoming well-read was long, and hence, writing books was not done to become famous. Authors wrote because they could not help themselves. And in the process they acquired fame by virtue of being good!
Coming to the present, where one can roll out books almost as soon as you finish writing (and editing) them. And where your book is available for people to read as soon as it is published.
And there is the social media which is ridden with comments and reviews; the path to reaching the mass can be covered with supersonic speed.
This has encouraged a lot more of us to write and get published, than before. People used to write diaries before, now they become memoirs which get published.
More of us writing is definitely not a bad thing for the writers; but from a reader perspective who tries to pick up a book, there might be times when they have to flip through a lot before they can get hold of something that is really worth their time.
Just because there are just so many books flooding the internet, confusing the readers more!
Unfortunately, the world of Facebook and Instagram has got us addicted to instant gratification.
And that, to me, is probably a step back for the world of books.
To write so that you can be appreciated, ironically, might be bad for writing. The best of writing often comes out of us when we are true to ourselves, and our emotions and thoughts get reflected on paper. And not when we are constantly restricted by the idea of selling the book, or if that book of ours, or that article of ours is going to get viral.
And the cherry on the top is the exponential decrease in attention span of today’s youth, or well, even the not-so-young who spend a lot of time in scrolling posts— just to stop for a 15 to 50 word post or a short 5-minute video.
Maybe not?
Because what we read is what our Feed (Instagram, Twitter, or Facebook feed) serves us. The AI behind these sites will decide what post I would like to read, or what book would I like to pick up.
Is creating smart technology by a few smart people detrimental to creative capacities as well as mental abilities of a lot of us?
Maybe.
In the words of Wednesday from the series Wednesday — social media is a soul sucking void of meaningless affirmation.
And with a pinch of wisdom, dollop of awareness, and trickle of self-regulation one might be able to come above it.
Image source: Urupong via Getty Images Pro, free on CanvaPro
read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Some time ago, Imtiaz Ali and Hansal Mehta respectively spoke of biopics of Madhubala and Meena Kumari. But do these biopics do justice to these women?
I recently came across a Reddit thread that discussed the fact that filmmaker Imtiaz Ali had announced making a biopic of Madhubala, and I wanted to explore this a little.
Of late, biopics based on the lives of beautiful but fatefully tragic women such as Lady Diana and Marilyn Monroe have created waves. Closer at home, we hear about the possibilities of biopics being made on the lives of Meena Kumari and Madhubala as well. These were hugely famous, stunningly beautiful women who were the heartthrobs of millions; who died tragically young.
I am glad that the Orange Flower Awards seek self-nomination. High achieving women often suffer from self-doubt, and this is a good way to remind us that we are good enough.
A few days ago, I saw an Instagram post announcing the Orange Flower Awards which recognise the power of women’s voices. I read about it with curiosity, but didn’t give it a second thought.
I received an e mail from Women’s Web seeking self-nominations for the Orange Flower Awards, and I ignored it. Yes, I write occasionally, but I didn’t think my work was good enough for me to nominate myself in any of the categories.
A past winner especially tagged me and asked me to look at nominating myself, and I told her that I was not ready yet. “That is up to you”, she said, “but I think you should nominate yourself.”
Please enter your email address