Check out these 5 useful tips for a blissful career!
Recent amendment suggested by Govt of India that proposes jail for fairness cream ads is a much needed step in the right direction, but what does it all really mean, and who will actually be punished?
The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements)(Amendment) Bill, 2020, aims to make misleading advertisements that promote fairness creams, obesity reduction pills, improve height etc, punishable by law. However, some aspects of the draft seem to require better definition, and in a society that hankers after “fairness” and “slim bodies,” is this provision enough?
The obsession with “perfect” bodies is prevalent everywhere, but for Indians, it seems to be especially pervasive, with every person, irrespective of their gender, being shamed for some bodily “flaw.” Be it the emphasis on “slim, fair brides,” or the demand for “tall grooms” with a full head of hair, not to mention mythical sexual prowess, we hear it all. This has led to the proliferation of a number of fraudulent products being advertised that prey on these insecurities and claim to “cure” everything from dark skin to sexual performance.
For a while now, activists and socially responsible citizens have been raising their voice against these products and ads. Some celebrities, such as actor Sai Pallavi, have also taken a stand and refused to work in ads that promote such products.
In cognizance of all these voices, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India, has proposed some amendments to the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act,1954. The proposal for the amendments is a welcome move in light of the concerns about misleading advertisements as highlighted by the Advertising Standards Council of India, an industry watchdog, on the basis of consumer complaints.
Some of the major changes suggested by the draft of the amendment, titled, Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements)(Amendment) Bill, 2020 are as follows:
This certainly is a step in the right direction! The fact is that many beauty products are promoted in ways that are misleading. Stuti Bhattacharya, writing for IDiva, provides a great example of how these advertisements manipulate us.
“Brands pick up an ingredient, say an orange, and claim their product uses the orange to, say, brighten skin. In the ad, they say the Vitamin C in orange helps brighten skin, without actually mentioning if their product contains Vitamin C. In the actual product, there is no Vitamin C, just cheap orange essential oil, and a cheap bleaching ingredient to lighten skin. So, what they say in the ad is:
Our brain deduces that orange contains Vitamin C and this product will therefore brighten our skin. What the brand DOESN’T mention explicitly is whether their product contains Vitamin C.
People are then misled into buying their products, thinking their skin will be brightened by a safe ingredient like Vitamin C. Instead, their skin is lightened by bleach with a product which smells like oranges, so they end up thinking it’s working,” she writes.
As the Telegraph reports, even government science laboratories haven’t been spared from being drawn into misrepresentations!
Scientists at the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research had developed a new formulation to treat acne marks, but a New Delhi based company had advertised the same via retail online electronic commerce channels as a “skin glow formulation” for “fair skin.” The product’s packaging specifies that the formulation was developed and licensed by the CSIR’s North East Institute of Science and Technology in Jorhat, Assam. The scientists were quick to point out that, this is a violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, because as a senior NIEST scientist said, “We had never intended our formulation to be promoted as a fairness cream.”
However, I wonder, what if a fairness cream “honestly” advertises that it works because it contains bleach? Given the desperation for fair skin in India, I can see people who will use the product, even if they know it contains harmful ingredients –so does the Act cover all advertisements that promote fairness of skin or only the ones that are “misleading” like in the examples above?
Other aspects of the law that are confusing to me involve the expanded definition of “advertisement” to include electronic and internet ads. This is a welcome move, certainly, considering that the data that companies get via social media usage etc. are used to directly target people.
The act states that, “no person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement” that makes false claims or misrepresents the true nature of the drug.
So for instance, will a person who runs a free blog on WordPress for example, who has no control over the ads that appear on their blog, be held responsible if a fairness cream ad or an ad for an obesity reduction pill appears? The ads that appear are usually dependent on the viewers’ browsing patterns –so does the viewer then become responsible for the ad? Or WordPress, because that is the platform? Or Google Adsense?
What about the CEOs of the companies that produce and promote these products? Advertising company heads? Celebrities that endorse these products?
Or will it be rank and file employees, and shopkeepers/beauty parlour owners etc. that will be held responsible?
As a layperson, I do not have the technical or the legal knowledge to answer these questions. If any of our readers have the answers, do let us know, because we are curious!
As Mahesh Zagade, former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner of Maharashtra, pointed out to the Hindu Businessline, stringent laws don’t make much of a difference if they are not followed through with implementation. “The question is, over the past 66 years, how many convictions occurred under the existing law which calls for six months imprisonment that can be extended up to a year? There has been hardly any,” he said.
The draft of the amendment is open to suggestions, comments and objections from the public as well as stakeholders for a period of 45 days, so please do share your thoughts with the government as responsible citizens. You can do so by sending an email to [email protected], or via post to Under Secretary (Drugs Regulation), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Room No. 414A, D Wing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110011.
We welcome the government’s initiative, and hope that all aspects of the law have been thought through. However, it is important to recognize that the fight against colourism and body shaming are far from over. The real change is needed in mindsets.
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
From all news reports, clearly, Aftab Poonawalla seems to be a psychopath, and It was a well-strategized story of domestic violence, abuse, subjugation, and a well-planned murder.
Trigger Warning: This deals with domestic violence, gaslighting, murder, and abetting violence, and may be triggering to survivors.
One case has gripped the nation and I do not need to mention which. My problem is with how the news reflects a victim’s character. The disrespect we show to someone who was long abused and lives no more is appalling. The disservice we do to her through spoken and written words lies in the sensationalizing of the entire case.
How do you spot a crazy human? They do not have two horns and red eyes. They may have no empathy but will show it to lure the victim, just like a child abuser lures a child with candy. Their grooming styles may vary but it is mostly about creating an untrue sense of safety and security around the victim. They present themselves as this effortless savior, an ultimate generous destination for a mentally and emotionally vulnerable person.
Fathers play a crucial role in nurturing and raising children, so why isn't paternity leave considered essential?
Some time ago, Bollywood couple Ranbir Kapoor and Alia Bhatt were in the news, yet again. An entertainment website, Bollywood Hungama, reported that the expectant father, Ranbir, wished to take paternity leave to spend time with his baby when it arrived.
The website claimed that the actor would not be signing new films for the time being. He would take care of the child, while his wife Alia would return to work at the earliest.
One would think the internet would laud this sweet and thoughtful gesture. Instead, Ranbir got trolled for his decision to be a stay-at-home dad. Netizens made fun of him; they claimed that it was because he had no offers in the pipeline, and Alia was far more successful than him. Others claimed that it was the right decision – his recent films (other than Brahmastra) had bombed, and it was time he reflected on his roles.
Please enter your email address