Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
While some fans have lauded Frozen 2 for taking on bold themes such as colonialism and discrimination, others such as this reviewer found the movie heavy-handed.
I am a huge fan of fairytales – the dresses, the balls and yes, the Prince Charming. I also like to think that I am a feminist. So no matter how gorgeous the ball gown or how swoon worthy the prince, there is still an element of patriarchy. Cinderella and Belle in all their live action glory still needed a man to get their happily ever after.
Then came Elsa, a kickass princess who rescues herself, saves her kingdom and learns to control her cool ice powers (pun intended) all with the help of her sister, a reindeer and a talking snowman.
The movie Frozen came out in 2013, becoming the highest grossing animated movie worldwide. At the time I found it just a cute movie with a catchy soundtrack. However it soon became clear that is was much more. With the genre defying trope of the so-called Prince Charming as the villain and the sweet portrayal of sisterly love it was much more than your average fairytale. And yes, it was a hit with the kids. So when I realized Frozen 2 had come out I had to see it, even if I’m not a kid.
Frozen 2 released seven years after the successful first movie – it is the continuation of the events of Frozen, starring Kristen Bell, Idina Menzel, Josh Gad and Jonathan Groff. Elsa is finally content in her role as Queen of Arendelle, Anna is sweet and carefree as always and Olaf the talking snowman is as funny as ever.
The sisters finally seem to have found their happily ever after, but trouble is brewing in the kingdom and when Elsa unintentionally awakens a series of powerful spirits she and her friends must right a wrong committed long ago, find out the truth about their parents past and restore order and harmony to the kingdom.
Like it’s predecessor, the movie is very women centric. A powerful woman rules the land with wisdom and courage and all the female characters from Elsa and Anna to their late mother Iduna seem to be fixing the mistakes made by the men in their lives. The closeness of the sisters is highlighted and it is heartwarming to see such a strong bond of sisterhood that Anna prioritises her boyfriend Kristoff. Elsa is still trying to protect Anna and sometimes making decisions on her behalf to save her.
Unfortunately, these elements and the wonderful costumes (Elsa, can I have that white dress?) and extraordinary CGI were the only good parts of the movie. The first Frozen movie was an innocent coming of age narrative that organically became a girl power story. The sequel however feels as if it is trying too hard. The themes are much darker and the mythology and flashbacks might be too much for younger children to understand. The fighting might disturb them and the spirits (of water and fire especially) may be too scary for a children’s movie.
In their quest to recapture the unintentional feminist themes of the original, directors Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee have ended up producing a heavy handed allegory about the evils of colonialism and discrimination against native tribes while invoking elements of Greek and Norse mythology. For example, the actions of the aisters’ grandfather Runeard who provoked a war with the neighboring kingdom of Northuldra, feel like too much of a political statement for a fairytale. Also, the revelation that Elsa and Anna are mixed race makes no sense and seems likely a last minute retcon in an attempt to seem more diverse.
All in all, though it had the girl power, catchy songs and amazing cinematography of the original, it lacked the fun and lighthearted air of the first Frozen.
As the BBC’s Nicholas Barber says, “In a way, it’s admirable that Buck and Lee didn’t play it safe, and that instead of making a simple fairy-tale they attempted a world-building, mind-expanding epic… but their barely comprehensible folly is so weird and bleak, and so full of magnificent, hallucinatory imagery, that it could be embraced by students as a midnight movie. Younger Elsa and Anna fans, on the other hand, will either be covering their eyes in distress or scratching their heads in confusion.”
Daughter-Sister-Student-Feminist-Nerd @nonsense.scribbles read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address