Over the years, your support has made Women’s Web the leading resource for women in India. Now, it is our turn to ask, how can we make this even more useful for you? Please take our short 5 minute questionnaire – your feedback is important to us!
Masculinity does not automatically equal toxicity. There are ways to “be a man” that are kinder and non-stereotypical –and male allies of feminism can help in getting the word out.
Toxic masculinity is an academic term that has found its way into popular vocabulary. As it always happens in such cases, the meaning is somewhat diluted and unclear to laypersons.
Especially given how much the term came up in discussions about Kabir Singh, I realized that, it has been taken by many people to mean that “men are toxic” or that “masculinity itself is toxic.” No wonder that there is such a backlash, especially by men, who obviously perceive it as a “feminazi agenda to emasculate them.”
If you’re a man reading this, I can tell you now that toxic masculinity does not mean that “all men are toxic.” It means that some aspects of “traditional masculinity” are problematic. Stick around and read on, because ultimately, it is you who can make a real difference in fixing these problematic bits.
If you’re a woman, read on as well. At the very least, it will give you an idea about how to recognize the “toxic” traits in men around you.
The term “Hegemonic masculinity” was first coined in 1982 by Australian sociologist Raewyn Connell and co-authors Dean Ashenden, Sandra Kessler, and Gary Dowsett, to describe “a dominant masculinity in any given situation that supersedes all other masculinities around it.” In 2005, they reevaluated the theory in light of the criticism around it, but the basic concept still stuck.
The first mainstream appearance of the term “toxic masculinity,” a 1990 was in a New Republic article by Daniel Gross, “The Gender Rap: ‘Toxic Masculinity’and Other Male Troubles,” in which he used the term to describe “behavior that diminishes women, children, other men.”
However, it is a study conducted in 2005, by Dr. Terry A. Kupers with imprisoned men that we mostly associate with the term “toxic masculinity” as we now understand it. He found that Connell’s hegemonic masculinity in a prison setting became toxic masculinity in its “pure form.” Pointing to black men who are disproportionately targeted by the American justice system. He argues that because of institutionalized racism for these men positive ways of expressing masculinity are cut off, leading them to express it in negative ways, and that prison further blocks their ability to find positive expressions.
This piece by Soraya Roberts, is a fascinating exploration of all these approaches to toxic masculinity.
Last year, the American Psychological Association released a list of guidelines for mental health practitioners working with boys and men who are socialized to conform to “traditional masculinity ideology,” which they say can be harmful to them. For example, leaving them at disproportionate risk for school discipline (being punished or expelled more often), academic challenges and health disparities, including a higher risk for cardiovascular problems and substance abuse (alcoholism, drug addiction etc).
Toxic masculinity is what we get when certain traits culturally associated with masculinity are taken to an extreme. These include:
When men are forced to fit into these narrow stereotypes and expectations, toxic masculinity is the result. The idea is created that there is only “one way” to “be a man,” and anyone who does not fit these parameters (including but not limited to gay men and trans men) is shamed and rejected.
This is the reason why men often do not report being sexually assaulted or having to face domestic abuse. They feel that doing so would make them “lesser” men.
A popular example given to compare and contrast are those of current US President Donald Trump as an example of toxic masculinity and former President Barack Obama as an example of what positive masculinity can look like.
In India, many celebrities, including Salman Khan, have been held up as examples of toxic masculinity. Pop-cultural examples of toxic masculinity include Kabir Singh, or the characters played by Rahul Bose and Anil Kapoor in Dil Dhadakne Do, as opposed to the characters played by Ranveer Singh and Farhan Akhtar, who are representative of a different, unstereotypical masculinity.
The film A Death In The Gunj, is a superbly portrays how “toxic masculinity” can overshadow other kinds of masculinity.
As the term toxic masculinity has gained popularity, the term “toxic femininity” has been used to counter it. People who use the term use it to refer to women who are abusive, violent, nasty etc. For example, the “queen bee” boss at work who is too dominating, passive-aggressive girlfriends and women who falsely accuse men of rape, domestic abuse etc.
Well, these women are definitely toxic, but their bad behavious is not a result of so called “feminine traits” being taken to an extreme, the way toxic masculinity is a result of so called “masculine traits” being taken to an extreme. In fact, the traits associated with femininity –submissiveness, nurturing, emotionality etc, when taken to an extreme are more harmful to the women themselves than to anyone else around them. In any case, they do not result in the sorts of behaviours described above.
As this piece by Tracy Moore points out women are toxic only when they imitate men.
Well, yes. Feminism is toxic to patriarchy and misogyny. That’s kind of the point.
And that is a good thing for everyone, because feminism rejects traditional gender roles and narrow definitions of what it means to “be a woman” or “be a man.” So it is against toxic masculinity, and not men.
We can begin of course, by rejecting narrow definitions of “manhood” and being more inclusive. Let us not bring up our children, especially our boys, by feeding them ideas like “boys must be tough” or that “boys don’t cry.”
However, as this insightful piece points out, focusing on cultural factors is not enough. It says, “by focusing on culture, people who oppose toxic masculinity can inadvertently collude with institutions that perpetuate it.
For example, the alcohol industry has funded research to deny the relationship between alcohol and violence, instead blaming “masculinity” and “cultures of drinking.” In this regard, the industry is repeating liberal feminist arguments about toxic masculinity. However, there is strong evidence that the density of liquor shops in a given geographic area increases the local rate of domestic violence. Any serious framework for preventing violence against women will address alcohol availability as well as masculine norms and sexism.”
When women talk about the negative aspects of masculinity, mean often get defensive. #NotAllMen is their instinctive response. This is why, it is important for men to speak where our voices don’t reach.
Men can be role models for young boys, and teach them to express their masculinity positively. Mothers must do their best to “raise the boys right,” but their efforts are more likely to create change if the boys have examples of positive masculinity that they can look up to.
As Wade Davis, an ex NFL player, who advocates for reconsidering our definitions of masculinity, says in this New York Times piece, “I don’t think it’s the work of women. I think it’s the work of men like myself who need to be talking to our brothers, fathers, our friends. It’s individual men, who are going to have to, at some point, decide how to define manhood and masculinity for himself.”
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
He said that he needed sometime to himself. I waited for him as any other woman would have done, and I gave him his space, I didn't want to be the clingy one.
Trigger Warning: This deals with mental trauma and depression, and may be triggering for survivors.
I am someone who believes in honesty and trust, I trust people easily and I think most of the times this habit of mine turns into bane.
This is a story of how a matrimonial website service turned into a nightmare for me, already traumatized by the two relationships I’ve had. It’s a story for every woman who lives her life on the principles of honesty and trust.
And when she enters the bedroom, she sees her husband's towel lying on the bed, his underwear thrown about in their bathroom. She rolls her eyes, sighs and picks it up to put in the laundry bag.
Vasudha, age 28 – is an excellent dancer, writer, podcaster and a mandala artist. She is talented young woman, a go getter and wouldn’t bat an eyelid if she had to try anything new. She would go head on with it. Everyone knew Vasudha as this cheerful and pretty young lady.
Except when marriage changed everything she knew. Since she was always outdoors, whether for office or for travelling for her dance shows, Vasudha didn’t know how to cook well.
Going by her in-laws definition of cooking – she had to know how to cook any dishes they mentioned. Till then Vasudha didn’t know that learning to cook was similar to getting an educational qualification. As soon as she entered the household after her engagement, nobody was interested what she excelled at, everybody wanted to know – what dishes she knew how to cook.