If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
So much of violence - both sexual and otherwise, is directed towards children, innocent victims of a patriarchal society that engages in power play and control.
So much of violence – both sexual and otherwise, is directed towards children, innocent victims of a patriarchal society that engages in power play and control.
Justice has been delivered in the Kathua gangrape case. And yet, the question that should agitate our minds, is why kids of such tender years are assaulted sexually or other wise.
Trigger warning: sexual abuse & violence
More boys are sexually abused than girls as per statistics, yet, our society being patriarchal, we live in denial that boys are raped. Even though the POCSO (The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act has been made gender neutral to tackle sexual abuse of all children, it cannot stem the rot of sexual abuse of kids.
And what begins as a sexual assault can slowly give way to sexual trafficking of kids, which is a part of the $150 million illicit world wide trade, which comes third after trade of small arms and drugs.
Recently, a 2 year old girl was found killed in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. As usual, the matter was politicized. One of accused who was arrested has been facing two charges under POCSO and yet he was roaming freely to look around for potential victims and traumatize more kids.
Hence, there is an urgent need to have a database of sexual offenders on a pan-India basis. This would help in faster arrests and a better conviction rate. This in turn would assist in assuring safety of kids.
The idea of a national registry of sexual offenders is by activists like Sunitha Krishnan of Prajwala. She also started a #ShametheRapist Campaign, approaching the Supreme Court with a plea that a national agency needs to deal with the gangrape and rape videos which are being shared on various social media and the internet.
As a result of this campaign and the activism by others, India has got a national registry of sex offenders.
It has been shown time and again that most of the sexual crimes are committed by people known to the child. As per NCRB data of 2016, 94.6% of offenders were known to the victims, 43.3% of rape victims are minors, and 13% of minor rape victims are aged 11 and below.
Obviously, minors are being raped by people known to them, and 75% of offenders are estimated to be known to these minor rape victims, obviously it must be above 75%. This is also one of the main reasons why conviction rate is as dismal as 30% because many a times, families want the ‘shame’ to remain within the family. Nobody tries to understand how this is going to traumatize the victim who is a family member as well! And this non-reporting of sexual assault makes the offender more brazen about perpetuating similar or more violent assaults on others within the family and outside.
Rapes are very traumatic crimes that affect the mental and the physical wellbeing of the victim/ survivor.
In India, it’s a social stigma as well. The victims/ survivors have to face the blame that they “asked for it” by wearing clothes which were “inappropriate” or by being “too bold”.
Rape is an act of power play and control. If the way the victim/ survivor dressed made somebody commit rape, then how can rapes of babies and women as old as eighty be explained? Gangrapes during communal flare ups and caste violence? Can they be explained by skimpy dressing? No! And definitely the rape of minors cannot be explained by dressing sense. Specially, rape of minor boys can never be explained, for those, who allege that girls need to stay within limits and not behave like boys!
Patriarchy is so entrenched that the offenders roam freely after raping many, while the victims and survivors face the wrath of the society, including anger from family and friends because the victim “asked for it”!
In a judgement delivered by Bombay High Court, the judges stated that rape is worse than murder, because it affects victims physically as also psychologically, and as a fallout, many of the victims tend to end their lives.
What needs to be done to prevent or lessen the number of rapes of minors ?
Many steps need to be taken. Firstly, make sex education a part of school curriculum as has been done recently . Sex education will enlighten minors about good touch and bad touch; this can help warn the minors about potential offenders.
Another step is sensitising the public about safety of children. It’s our duty as adults to create a safe environment for our children so that they grow up into fearless, healthy adults. Minors who are raped suffer trauma on a life long basis, with a lot of psychological issues.
Police needs to be sensitised to take faster action, with thorough investigation in all cases relating to sexual assaults of minors. This will assist in increasing the conviction rate under the POCSO Act.
And last, but not the least, faster trials and speedy dispensation of justice will act as a deterrent. Certainty of punishment is a deterrent; not the death penalty.
Death penalty awarded for rape as well as for murder might mean that rapists might think nothing of killing their victims as well. This needs to be avoided at all costs.
Death penalty has almost the same effect of deterrence as life imprisonment as per 262nd Indian Law Commission Report.
Death penalty is a long and winding process.
Death penalty is expensive.
Errors in judgement lead to innocent people being punished by death penalty.
Death penalty has often been shown to be awarded to people who are from the minorities, and scheduled castes and tribes.
Kailash Satyarthi, the Nobel Peace Prize Winner in a recent article on the occasion of World Day Against Child Labour, 12th June 2019 talks about steps each of us must take, to reach the goal of a child friendly society. Because each time we remain silent as we witness any injustice in whatsoever form regarding a child, we let down that child and ultimately our future.
Because, as stated by Nelson Mandela, “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.”
Image source: shutterstock
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
I am a law graduate from Government Law College,Mumbai.I am a Fellow in General Insurance ( technical qualification for insurance ) .I am a homemaker at present, having worked for nearly 16 years in General read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: