Running a business in Bangalore? Hear from successful entrepreneurs how they grew the business, and you can too: REGISTER NOW!
As a trans woman, Bobby’s divorce and alimony petition challenges the legal definition of the word ‘woman’. Will ruling on this give the SC a chance to make it more inclusive?
Bobby Darling is a trans woman, a fairly well known name and face from movies and TV. Currently in a divorce case against her abusive husband, she’s having to battle also against the legal definition of ‘woman’.
Bobby, assigned male at birth and named Pankaj Sharma, underwent a sex reassignment surgery in 2015, changing her name to Pakhi Sharma. In 2016, she married Bhopal-based businessman Ramneek Sharma, in a Hindu ceremony. Barely a year after, she had filed an FIR against her husband accusing him of demanding dowry, assault, and usurping her money and property. She has also filed for a divorce, and is demanding alimony from her estranged husband.
Till now the situation reads like a love marriage sadly gone awry. But Bobby’s situation is even more heart-rending than a cis-woman in the same plight.
This is because Bobby’s estranged husband, Ramneek alleges that their marriage is not legally valid because Bobby was not born a woman. Ramneek’s lawyers G J Ramchandani and Hitesh Ramchandani, say that the marriage is void under the Hindu Marriage Act, as it only recognizes a marriage between a man and a woman. Also, in the Domestic Violence Act, Hindu Marriage Act or in IPC laws, there is still no allocation for transgender marital rights.
This is a technical loophole that Ramneek Sharma is taking advantage of, in a 1955 Hindu Marriage Act and the 2005 Domestic Violence Act, that do not recognise trans women’s rights under these laws.
And therein lie Bobby’s woes.
Bobby Darling’s petition is a case that can challenge India’s legal definitions of the word ‘woman’.
Who is a woman? The esteemed architects of the Indian constitution wouldn’t have imagined the necessity of explicitly specifying what makes a woman or a man. An increasing awareness of gender identities and inclusion have made this definition /clarification necessary, so that such loopholes cannot be misused.
In the past few months the Judiciary has been coming out with many path breaking judgements. Can the judges walk the talk yet again?
Should archaic laws be interpreted literally or be truer to the spirit of the existing situation?
Should the changing value systems, sensibilities, and open social mores be not taken into consideration while judging a case?
Will the abusive Ramneek get an easy way out due to a moth-balled interpretation of the law?
Will the esteemed courts stand tall and justice is served?
Will Bobby be the catalyst to change?
Image source: YouTube
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Anupama Jain is the author of 'When Padma Bani Paula', a breezy novel about second
All You Need To Know About Alimony And Maintenance Laws In India
Kudos, Delhi High Court, For Your Judicious Decision In This Recent Divorce Case
Divorce In Hindi Cinema Favoured The Man, Always, Until Recent Movies Changed This Narrative
Afreen Rehman Raises Her voice Against Triple Talaq. Knocks At Court Doors For Justice
Get our weekly mailer and never miss out on the best reads by and about women!