If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
We are tired of hearing words like rape, murdered, molested and victims. Our hearts need good news too to be hopeful and have faith in the goodness of humanity.
Have you ever realized that what you hear, see and perceive over a period of time, becomes either your perception of the world or your worst fears?
Just take a test of the five questions listed below:
Do not reply on an impulse. Do not reply under an influence. Reply from your heart.
Although the answers are almost predictable (thanks to the changing mindsets today), the answers will still vary. The answers will probably also enlighten you about the person you are; but – only if you are honest with yourselves while answering them. Maybe, you will be surprised at the way you think, despite your advocacy for women’s empowerment, gay rights and what not.
The way you have seen life until now, is the way you will continue to perceive the world around you. And that, is your perception of the world, no matter how hard you try to camouflage your actual opinions with cheesy lines on how women suffer and how women need to fight back. Face it!
Have you ever observed the kind of cinema you enjoy? For instance, in Bollywood – men are forever portrayed as never-ageing Greek gods! People don’t seem to have issues with a 50+ Khan romancing a 20+ woman, but eyebrows are raised if a 40+ woman has feelings for a man younger to her. Why? Because, our society thinks the way it perceives the characters in cinema. I have grown up watching Aamir Khan in movies like Dil, Jo jeeta wahi Sikandar and Qayamat se Qayamat tak. He was one of my crushes when I was studying. But of late, I found myself questioning, “Isn’t Aamir Khan too old to romance Katrina in Dhoom?”, or for that matter I think, “Isn’t Salman Khan too old to fall for the fresh Jacqueline Fernandez in Kick? (All that said, I still adore Aamir Khan). However, these very actors used to romance golden beauties like Juhi Chawla and Madhuri Dixit on screen, long, long ago. And, that is when I realized that our cinema has been instrumental in creating a somewhat-vague-image of a woman.
The general impression of a woman does not go beyond ‘chittiyan kalaiyan‘ or ‘jadu hai nasha hai’ (Leave aside movies like Mardani, Queen, Gulab Gang, NH10 types. They are just a handful.) This is precisely why our society is unable to perceive a woman any different than the usual – the desirable. She can be a strong, independent, fierce and dominant character, but only in dreams! Anyways, I am digressing, although the beginning of this post is well-connected with the context of this post – which is – what you perceive over a period of time, becomes you in totality. There has to be a good reason why courage has taken a beating and the fears of unknown and lack of goodwill have increased.
And so the question strikes, “Is there anything good we hear about these days?”
For instance, let’s talk about the December 16th incident of 2012 that shook the world. Playing and replaying the unspeakable horrors of the ghastly incident for over two years (including Suzette Jordan’s story) has not done much good to the society, except disturbing the already disturbed. I have had sleepless nights that year and I still get cold shivers when I think about the brave heart Nirbhaya. May her soul rest in peace.
And then, the Park Street rape incident added to the woes of ‘modern’ women. Suzette Jordan was not the conventional woman who wore salwar kameez. She was a single mother to two teenage girls, and she was a supremely independent woman who lived life on her own terms even if she was unemployed for a long period. She had no qualms about her drinking and smoking and she cared two hoots about what this world thought about her. And, when she was raped, the world labeled her a slut because she was not the quintessential Indian woman as described by our society. Yet, she fought the world with all her might. I loved her. I respect that strong soul. (RIP Suzette). And I loved her to pieces when she said, “I have a name. My name is Suzette Jordan”. She did not like to be referenced as the ‘Park Street rape victim’. And that is precisely what I am talking about – the label!
Yes, the label ‘victim’ that is slapped on a woman who falls prey to this torment of a lifetime – rape. The physical scars heal over the years, but the psychological scars inflicted, bleed for a lifetime. Imagine the amount of grit and will for a rape survivor to pick up the tattered pieces of her life, to begin all over again as a normal human, to brave threats and disturbing calls from unknown predators, to walk on the street without being pried upon and to forget the horrors she prays no lady must undergo. People, she is not a victim. She is a survivor.
Survivors make good news. Let’s know more of them. Let me mention some of these beautiful survivors here.
Many might wonder, what is new about the above? The world knows them. But then, also ask yourself, what do you tend to discuss more? People enjoy discussing the pain and the torment of a rape survivor (something that our social media does with such finesse!) more than discussing her verve to break free from the fear bubble to fight the world and, move on.
The intent of this post is not to discourage the realist in people. But then, be a realist with an urge to move on from the stagnancy of ‘what has happened is not good’ to ‘what can be done about this’. If there are ten bad things happening in the world, throw more light on the one good thing that is also happening simultaneously. There are many people who are trying hard to do good in the world by fighting illiteracy, Khaps and witchcraft, and educating the children in slums, thereby helping this society heal. Now, don’t they deserve more mention than how many rapes and murders are happening around the country?
A couple of years back, my brother-in-law, Sridhar (a journalist), had started a group on Facebook – Good news only. When the group started, I initially wondered, “What is the point in spreading good news only? Why keep the world in dark about the news that is not good? Understanding reality is more important than living in a bubble that the world is good.” Those were my initial thoughts.
But I was so wrong! Understanding reality is a faux pas today. We do not ‘understand’ reality. We empathize with it. We relish it. We discuss it. We gossip about it. We play and replay it. We devour it. We forget it. But we do not understand it.
‘Good news only’ may not solve problems instantly. It may not change things drastically. It may not even be convincing enough to be heard. But then, there is one thing which it gives – hope. Once people understand this, faith will follow suit. And then, the change will happen. Which is why, we need ‘good news only’. More of it.
This post was previously published at the author’s blog.
Image adapted via Shuttertsock
A software engineer in the past, a content writer, an amateur blogger, an avid reader and traveler, an engaging conversationalist, an army wife, a pre school teacher and importantly, an incurable optimist! read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: