Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
Air India Express recently put out an ad for female cabin crew requiring 'clear complexion without any blemish, even and regular teeth". This is blatant, in your face objectification.
Air India Express recently put out an ad for female cabin crew requiring ‘clear complexion without any blemish, even and regular teeth”. This is blatant, in your face objectification.
In a Hindustan Times story dated 3rd July, an Air India Express Limited call for hiring female cabin crew has been mentioned. In addition to eligibility conditions regarding BMI, height, educational qualifications and marital status there is a rather sexist mention of :
“Cosmetic appearance: Should be well groomed with Clear complexion without any noticeable blemish, no odd scars /birthmarks. Even and regular teeth.”
Earlier too in India, Spicejet was accused of similar sexualisation of a job profile.
Women flight attendants in particular are expected to fit into specific notions of sexual attractiveness. The same airlines list other jobs for men but make no mention of the candidate’s complexion, scars, birthmarks, teeth etc. The implication thus is obvious that other employees will be hired on the basis of other merits but women flight attendants shall undergo keen sexualised scrutiny and objectification of their bodies.
Aesthetic labour isn’t uncommon especially in the field of aviation. In fact both Pilot and Flight Attendant turned up in a list released by Tinder for the top 15 most-right-swiped jobs for men and women from November 2015 to January 2016.
In such jobs the feelings and appearance of employees are often commoditised, more so for women employees.
Some time ago, several PR agencies had claimed that government owned airlines were condemned and lost business because of “matronly” flight attendants. This led to a race to hire younger and “sexier” looking cabin crew in the name of providing emotional support to the fliers, as their primary job was to make travellers feel looked after and “served” well.
However it is not the job itself only that leads to the objectification, male cabin crew members have two additional years of age relaxation (they are accepted up to the age of 27) and also no emphasis for them on skin colour and teeth etc. Though there is evident pressure on appearance even long after the recruitment process. Cabin Crew has strict BMI norms to follow, but for women it just doesn’t stop at that.
There have been previous similar incidents too both in India and globally where women have been harassed and body shamed for cabin crew job recruitments and interviews.
A woman candidate who had applied to Garuda- the main Indonesian Airlines revealed in a news report that she and other women candidates for a cabin crew job were subjected to a health examination by a male doctor. This examination involved their breasts being fondled.
Garuda officials later said that this “hand examination” was done to detect implants to avoid any future health issues for the flight attendants if air pressure falls in-flight. This however is NOT a common procedure in most other global airlines.
Aviation Australia, another major worldwide airline sets the minimum requirement to always applying foundation, eye-shadow, mascara, blusher and lipstick. Their specific service handbook for women employees stipulates specific rules like getting their hair trimmed every 4-5 weeks, using a good quality shampoo, use appealing footwear etc.
Aviation experts generally opine airlines want to appear classy and high-end than their competitors. They want to market their service as luxurious and desirable. Hence there is extreme emphasis on youth and beauty to transmit that message of “attractive” service.
These kind of gender-specific beauty requirements are clearly employment discrimination. This “how-you-look-matters” is clearly a case of lookism as well as sexism.
Image source: YouTube
Pooja Priyamvada is an author, columnist, translator, online content & Social Media consultant, and poet. An awarded bi-lingual blogger she is a trained psychological/mental health first aider, mindfulness & grief facilitator, emotional wellness trainer, reflective read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address