If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
A gendered event that affected millions, the Partition is still relevant to us. Oral historian Aanchal Malhotra on why it is important to know the history.
Do you remember studying the Partition as a part of history in school? Did any of you have a specific chapter devoted to the Partition of India? No, right? Neither did I. All I remember was one chapter on the Independence struggle that had ONE line on the Partition of India and Pakistan.
That one chapter did not justice to the horrors that millions of people suffered, it didn’t explain the pain that people felt when they left their country and came to a whole new one. Neither did it do justice to telling us stories of women throughout history.
Which is exactly why oral historian and author Aanchal Malhotra believes we need to have more oral archives of our history. To understand what happened not just in terms of number but people too. And to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.
Aanchal Malhotra is also the author of the book Remnants Of A Separation – a non-fiction work on the material objects refugees carried across the Radcliffe Line in 1947. (In case, you’re wondering what the Radcliffe Line is, it is the boundary demarcation between Indian and Pakistani portions of the Punjab and Bengal provinces of British India)
‘When I read about the Partition in school, I never thought of it as my history. It was just history to me, despite the fact that FOUR of my grandparents migrated from Pakistan to India after the Partition,’ says Aanchal whose book completed three years recently.
Published in 2017, Remnants of A Separation may be 21 chapters, but has far too many stories hidden inside them. What started with stories of her own grandparents is now a book opening up inter-generational conversations about an event that killed and displaced millions of people. One that affected women the most.
Though the Partition was a one-time event, its forces were at play for a much longer time with families migrating before and after. And with communal violence occurring as soon as 16 August 1946 with Direct Action Day in Calcutta. Though the line was officially drawn after the 15th August, people had been migrating well before and after it too.
Families were leaving their ancestral properties at a moment’s notice, not knowing whether they’d be back. And in such a moment, they had to decide what items to take with them – the ones that would help them set up home in a completely different country. Throughout history often only heard men’s stories of the Partition and its effect on them. While there are books written on women’s stories, they still are few and far in between.
“All through history, we have mostly heard men and their accounts of what happened during the Partition, and how they had to start over. On the one hand we have authors like Urvashi Butalia and Ritu Menon writing women’s stories.
“But on the other, we still need to tell stories of women who left their houses they so lovingly decorated and had to be uprooted and taken to a new place with refugee camps,” she says while talking about the women and the Partition.
“Women definitely bore both the physical and the emotional brunt of the Partition more than the men did. While, yes, the men did need to go out and find jobs and earn enough to feed their entire families, the women were the backbones of the family. I believe, families may have broken down and crumbled had women not shown the emotional strength they had. They were the ones who kept the family bond alive even in the toughest of times.”
There weren’t just women who left with their families, there were the single women too. Women who left their homes with their kids since the men stayed back either to take care of the property or had already left. One such example is Aanchal’s maternal great grandmother.
She left their house in D.I. Khan, North-West Frontier Province to reach Delhi where she and her kids stayed in a refugee camp. It took them two days and two nights to reach Delhi Since she was alone then, she had to do everything on her own – right from finding a job to earn to feed her children to make sure they didn’t lose hope.
“Not only did they bear the emotional brunt on the family front but also the physical brunt of it. Thousands of women from both India and Pakistan were raped and killed in the violence that followed the Partition. Women were abducted, murdered everywhere.
“I remember stories people told me of how their families would give women and girls chilli powder or daggers to carry with them to avoid ‘being killed or worse.’ So yes, I do believe that the Partition was a gendered event which affected women in far more intimate and devastating ways than it did men,” Aanchal says when asked about the Partition being a gendered event.
She says during that time, people learnt to suppress the things that happened to them – either because they had to move on or because they barely considered it necessary. Speaking about the importance of material memory, Aanchal says, ‘At the time, memory was barely considered important. People and their stories became mere numbers. Statistics to teach history from.
“I wish there had been journalists and oral historians recording what people had gone through and witnessed. Perhaps the, we would’ve understood the aftermath of the Partition a bit better.”
Which is precisely what she is trying to do with oral history- get people to speak up more about their history and understand it. Maybe if we understood that the Partition didn’t just end in 1947 with the line being drawn, we may understand our own history a bit better. And maybe we will work on making sure that history never repeats itself.
You can find your copy of the book Remnants Of A Separation on Amazon India here and on Amazon US here.
Picture credits: Provided by the interviewee
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Reader, writer and a strong feminist, I survive on coffee and cuddles from dogs! Pop culture, especially Bollywood, runs in my veins while I crack incredibly lame jokes and puns! read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: