"She must have asked for it" is a common statement made when women face abuse; worse when it happens online, isolating them by cutting off their online support too.
“She must have asked for it” is a common statement made when women face abuse; worse when it happens online, isolating them by cutting off their online support too.
About 11 years ago when Orkut and Facebook had made an entry into my life, a fear too made a permanent place – of being stalked online, mostly by random men. Almost simultaneously I was also venturing into blogging and learning the tricks and one important lesson I learnt was – never feed the trolls, which I started applying to social media too, and yet the menace grew.
Orkut shut down, Facebook grew into a Frankenstein monster, and more social media made their presence felt almost like a necessity. Like all monsters growing new powers and acquiring new weapons all of these kept changing their formats and modes of interaction.
Thus was invented the OTHER inbox where all the messages from people not in your lists or directly connected to you landed.
Now let’s be honest, don’t we all check this place once in a while to fish for a genuine compliment or looking for maybe a long lost friend?
Whenever I did, it was new revelations, and a few broad ‘annoying’ types I found, obviously excluding the rare and few meaningful chats there too:
Religious Preachers– No hello or hi! Straight to the point, religious message, GIFs of gods and goddesses, ta ta!
Cryptic Coders– Types in some weird alphabetical code which only he can read and expects you to find that cool!
Sticky Notes– Sends good morning, good day, good evening, good night texts without fail, doesn’t care whether you respond or not.
Bollywood Prototypes– Floods the inbox with mushy love songs and love poems and believes No is Yes, Silence is Yes, basically everything is their fantasy.
Repeat Offenders– The nastiest perverts who will send you annoying pictures of their man hoods and send you suggestive questions about libido and sex chats. Ask for nudes with entitlement and think of themselves as no less than Adonis.
Ac per Section 354A of the IPC any one posting lewd comments on social media are liable to be punished with one-year imprisonment and fine. Posting/messaging content related to pornography against the will of a woman or requesting sexual favours are punishable by a fine along with three years of imprisonment under the same provision. There are several other provisions too in the IPC. However it has done little to discourage random men from jumping into women’s inboxes.
This is clearly a case of male entitlement and also gets nurtured by silence of women in which they often shroud this stemming from their feelings of shame and fear about such abuse, because there are plenty of those around us to who will push the blame on the victim woman and offer lame arguments like –“She must have asked for it.” “She writes provocatively.” “She uses the word SEX openly.”
Sometimes women also don’t speak up because now families and colleagues also connected on Social Media for some it would mean a ‘ban’ from using Social Media or ‘awkwardness’ at workplace.
Most social networks and media platforms are also almost ineffective at preventing abuse; it has become an ‘acceptable’ online experience for most women now, and they are told to just ignore and block. This creates a culture of silence where the men then continue the same modus operandi with other women being confident they wouldn’t be called out.
We all must then be accountable for all the communities we are a part of even if they are just online. We are proud about the magical connections happening online; similarly we must take the initiative to reduce this entitlement and silence around a covert and coercive abuse of women which doesn’t allow them to behave and interact freely, and thus limits their freedom of expression.
Image source: a still from the movie Veere di Wedding
Pooja Priyamvada is an author, columnist, translator, online content & Social Media consultant, and poet. An awarded bi-lingual blogger she is a trained psychological/mental health first aider, mindfulness & grief facilitator, emotional wellness trainer, reflective read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, indivisual posts do not necessarily represent the platofrom's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
This strange love story reminds me of Princess Diana when she gave an interview about Prince Charles - "There were three of us in this marriage!”
This love was flawed and broken the way only we humans know how to break things with our ego, pride, insecurity and complexities!
Where do I even begin to tell the story of how deep a love can be, how it transcends time, place and people. Perhaps this is a story about how women are their own worst enemies. Either way it is a story that tells us how frail, fragile and fraught we are as humans and how much we hurt each other.
This love story began when I was two years old. Growing up in India in a culture that wove love stories like Laila Majnu, Heer Ranjha and the epic symbol of love, the Taj Mahal, into the very fabric of our existence, love was always an integral part of our lives.
One such love story was of a boy and a girl who were neighbours. The boy, an athlete, artist and a poet, found his muse in this shy, thoughtful and in her own way poetic girl, who seemed to worship the very ground he walked on. Her face could be found in all the paintings he created, and her name in every poem he wrote. The girl called him Sagar, which means ocean, symbolizing his all-encompassing love for her.
Everything thing was going well; their wedding date was being finalized, till the boy’s older brother who was a doctor in the same little town, got accepted into Stanford Medical School to do his MS.
Earlier my husband would say, 'Arey! What is there in making dal-roti? It's so simple.' After he had to cook everyday when I was ill, he has stopped saying that to me!
“Arey! What is there to do in making dal roti? Put a handful of lentils in the cooker and let it whistle and make two rotis. After all, how long will it take?” A handful of dal (lentils) and two rotis! This is the story of every woman and no one seems to understand.
Some time ago, after a shopping spree, my husband and I entered the house, exhausted. I had just about kept all the bags aside, when my husband said, “I am very hungry, can you make something.”
I looked at my husband in amazement and thought, ‘He had just had food, how did he get hungry again so soon?’
My husband, as if he had read my face, said, “Arey! You know that my stomach is not filled with outside food. Just make dal roti. What is there to do in making dal roti? Put a handful of lentils in the cooker and let it whistle and make two rotis. After all, how long will it take?”
‘Is this the way dal (lentils) and roti are made?’ The thought came to my mind. ‘After all, I also went along and now I am tired too.’ I was also getting angry at myself that after all, I had spoiled the habit of everyone in the house.
A culture that is based on a gendered hierarchy, condones gender based violence, normalises the toxic behaviour of men, even eulogising it, is rape culture. Here's how you identify it.
A culture that is based on a gendered hierarchy, condones gender based violence, normalises the toxic behaviour of men, even eulogising it, is rape culture. Here’s how you identify it.
In a patriarchy, many cultural practices are based on discrimination which is often gender based, and violence against women in the belief that they ‘need to stay in their place’, and in action like actual physical/ emotional/ sexual/ financial violence may be considered a ‘normal’ way to behave.
Those in a privileged position may actually not see anything wrong in this kind of behaviour.
A culture that considers this normal is rape culture. Such a culture often condones rape, by blaming the victim for it, or minimising the responsibility of the perpetrator, or if there is outrage over it, it is too superficial to cause any real social change.
A global report on online violence against women journalists proves that online or offline, women aren't safe for expressing their opinions!
A global report on online violence against women journalists proves that online or offline, women aren’t safe for expressing their opinions!
UNESCO and International Center for Journalists (CFJ) published a report on online violence against women journalists from a global survey conducted in the late 2020s. In this survey, over 900 responses have been recorded in five languages from 125 countries, out of which 714 respondents identify as women.
Respondents from Asian, South Asian, South-East Asian, East Asian or Central Asian countries comprised for only 13 percent of the total. Seventy-six percent of the total respondents were aged between 25 and 50. Twelve percent of the total respondents represent top editorial leadership positions. And 46 percent of respondents are news or investigative journalists or reporters. You can read the full report here.
Seventy-three percent of the women respondents said they had experienced online abuse. Of these, 49 percent were abused with hateful language, 48 percent with unwanted private messages and 42 percent were targetted with reputational threats. Meanwhile, 25 percent said they received threats of physical violence and 23 percent received threats to their professional standing. At the same time, 18 percent of them were threatened with sexual violence while another 18 percent detected surveillance and 13 percent received threats of violence against those close to them.