Indrani Mukerjea’s Trial By Media: What Do We Learn From It?

Posted: September 7, 2015

Why are we so interested in Indrani Mukerjea’s trial? Is it because she is a woman who married thrice and is rich too?

For the past few weeks, we are being fed a daily diet of the Mukherjea-Khanna-Bora family saga. Like it or not, we are being force-fed with newer versions each day. From sticking microphones into the homes, windows, and what-not of the prime players involved in the drama to bystanders and incidental side players, anyone who was ever connected with Indrani, or had anything to do with her or had an axe to grind with her is being quoted. In short, everyone who is anyone is having their moment in the limelight. Whatsapp jokes, twitter feeds, cartoons and lewd jokes discussing Indrani’s marital life have now become common.

Whether or not, she is found guilty along with her alleged cohorts in the crime, certain disturbing aspects to our own herd behaviour comes to light.

  • Human nature being what it is, there is a certain sly satisfaction in what is perceived as the ‘Fall of The Mighty.’ A Power Couple which was riding the wave of celebrity, (although in the doldrums professionally,) is now in ‘Big Trouble.’ The tone of some of the pieces is almost one of smugness.
  • What was perceived as a solid marriage appears to have been a mirage. That should in itself tell us something about how deceptive appearances can be.
  • A strong indicator of the fragility of friendships, a ‘rats deserting a sinking ship’ phenomena is being seen. ‘Friends’ and ‘acquaintances’ alike who probably clinked glasses with them at various times and broke bread with them, are coming out of the woodwork and saying terrible things about them.
  • The speculation about Indrani’s husbands, her relationships and how she could manipulate them, etc. is taking on a disturbing slant. One wonders whether she is guilty of remarrying or murder. Perhaps her greater crime is ‘She left him for better life’?
  • Last, but not the least, most of the discussions smack of being judgemental in a very sexist way. Do we need the sexual life and marital antecedents to be probed and revealed in such lip-smacking detail?

Do not for a minute assume that I am saying that she is innocent! Nor that the plight of the murdered Sheena is being glossed over!

But would we have so smug if the accused was not a ‘Page Three Person?’

Would we have been so interested in the alleged murder of a young girl by her parent, if said parent was not the poster-child for a ‘rags-to-riches’ story?

Would we have been so titillated, if the accused was not thrice-married?

And lastly, with the double standards so peculiar to our culture, would we have been so lewdly interested, if the accused had not been a woman?

We have not really progressed from casting Soorpanakha, the sexually liberated sister of Ravana as a spoilsport demoness.

We have not really progressed from casting Soorpanakha, the sexually liberated sister of Ravana as a spoilsport demoness. Sleeveless-blouse-big-bindi-loud-makeup are still being typecast as vamps in TV serials, and promiscuity( read sexually liberated ) is even now a hallmark of the female villain in Bollywood.

Let us not commit the cardinal mistake of being the judge and jury of the moral and personal ethics of a person, who has married more than once and is also incidentally a woman.

Perhaps, as the investigation unfolds we may hear even more shocking revelations about Indrani and her life.

But the crime here is that of murder, not divorce! And, not remarrying or promiscuity.

So let the Law take its course. And let us keep the murder case just that -a case of murder.

 

I am Ujwala Shenoy Karmarkar. I love reading, meeting people, listening to music, watching plays,

Learn More

VIDEO OF THE WEEK

Comments

2 Comments


  1. kuttysureshkutty -

    I agree with the author,It is totally wrong to publicly persecute someone (a woman) like this unless it is a Woman ( whether reasonable or not) fighting a man ( Jasleen, Rohtak sisters) on social media, in which case we should jump into the bandwagon and praise the women as braveheart and label the men as pervert and screw their life.

  2. Yeah, I agree to that partiality here… But partially.

    For me… I personally felt very strong and emotionally furious on Indrani because… It was a “mother” who could so cold bloodedly strangulate her first born child… The voice… The life which first ever called her a mother.

    Maybe because, even in honour killings, with my little knowledge, never have I heard a mother doing the heinous crime. Also, it was not a spurt of the moment reaction… Rather well planned, chalked out, and tried to coverup so cleverly. The worst was when she could smile and pose for the cam from different locations with Vidhie and Peter, as though nothing has happened. Any other person would have withdrawn from social attention and would have battled with her guilt, every minute.

    This soil has seen mothers as living Gods, who have given up their life for the well being of their daughter. That is the level of sacrifice. But what has happened here is so gruelling… Painful and shocking.

    That… And that exactly… is why this case is so different and Indrani is catching a lot of attention.

Share your thoughts! [Be civil. No personal attacks. Longer comment policy in our footer!]

Feminist Book Picks

Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!

An Event For Ambitious Women!