Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
Indian bahus have far too many rules imposed on them - including 'staying away' from their husband's male relatives. Ever wondered why?
Indian bahus have far too many rules imposed on them – including ‘staying away’ from their husband’s male relatives. Ever wondered why?
Why must Indian bahus maintain distance from their husbands’ male relatives?
This is yet another perplexing question in the lives of almost every Indian bahu. The characters, in this case, are usually the grooms’ fathers and male siblings. In addition to this, you have uncles from both sides of the families, brothers-in-law and the sisters’ husbands, of course.
For the bahus both old and new, these gentlemen are ‘out of bounds’ and ‘inaccessible.’ Now, what does this imply? One, in ultra-orthodox families bahus must don the ghunghat (cover their heads) all the time. Two, social interactions between the two sexes is to be exceedingly formal and as minimal as possible.
Ideally, bahus should be seen and not heard. Customary greetings largely remain confined to a perfunctory namaste or touching of the feet wherever applicable. In return as a token of blessing, the men are allowed to touch the women only on the head. Nothing beyond.
In earlier times some Bengali families went a step further. Which touching the feet, the bahus were actually not allowed to touch the feet of these elder relatives. Instead, the had to bow to the foreground where the men stood. How utterly absurd! Thus, obviously, shaking hands or even a semblance of a hug are an absolute no-no!
At this point, one needs to ponder a few points about these social norms. What is the rationale behind them? Self-proclaimed moral guardians would say that these measures were incorporated to maintain and preserve the chastity and dignity of the women in the families.
Aha! Does this mean that the men in these households are sex-starved maniacs? That the moment they see a woman not related to them by blood but by law, they’d unleash the sexual fury on them? (While this does happen very often, it is always the woman who is blamed, instead of the man.)
Secondly, if men can hug and kiss their daughters and sisters on their foreheads without any sexual intent, why can’t they hug their female relatives? (With consent and absolutely no sexual intent, of course!)
So where does this mental block arise from? Does society believe that women are so sexually volatile that a consensual hug by any relative will arouse them? Have we really not heard of an affectionate but completely sexless and consensual hug?
However, there is one major discount that is nothing short of good news for the bahu brigade. While it brings with it its own set of barriers on women, they are ‘allowed’ to foster informal and amicable ties with their husband’s younger brother.
According to ancient scriptures, the husband’s younger brother is like a son or a brother to the woman and thus needs to be treated with due care and affection. But a paradox crops up here too – while women do have the license do be friendly with their younger brothers-in-law, can the family guarantee that the man won’t get carried away?
And if that were to happen, guess who will take the blame? The woman of course! A lot of these rules, I believe, were made to ‘keep the women of the family under control.’ Because whoever heard of teaching men about consent and the word ‘no’?
Nonetheless, the whole business is incredibly bizarre and utterly preposterous! It often makes me wonder why in India – the place that birthed Kama Sutra – must these Draconian laws govern interpersonal relationships?
Think about it practically and realistically. People definitely have their own set of morals. Let’s stop putting these barriers on women in 2021!
Picture credits: Still from Bollywood movie Hum Saath Saath Hain
Am a trained and experienced features writer with 25 plus years of experience .My favourite subjects are women's issues, food travel, art,culture ,literature et all.Am a true feminist at heart. An iconoclast read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
We often hear of relationships doomed by distances, of love wearing off when physical proximity ceases, and of growing apart. Most of my life I grew up witnessing the opposite of this. Thus, my belief in growing together whether distant or near stands tall.
When I think back today, I owe a lot of my value system to being a part of army life. This is the love of steel-hearted women who breathe life and passion into the soldiers of the armed forces.
A book by Swapnil Pandey, The Force Behind the Forces, is apt here. The love of these gritty women powers the men to confidently step out and face the most hostile situations. I feel privileged to share a personally witnessed account of this undying love and faith.
When someone accuses you of "too much feminism", what they are really saying is, "I am uncomfortable with you challenging the status quo and disrupting my privilege".
Time and again, there is one phrase that keeps coming up in the social media discourse on feminism. Any guesses?
Ah, no prizes for guessing the infamous “itni bhi feminist” or “too much feminism” phrase, a classic eye-roller for me, and I am sure for many more of my tribe, in the realm of gender equality discussions.
Pray tell me, how can an ideology, a movement be too ‘much’? It’s not salt or the seasoning of your soup where you can go, “Oops, too much salt, only one spoon was required”. Either you stand for what feminism stands for, or you don’t.
Please enter your email address