If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
What are the similarities between Indira Gandhi, Mamta Banerjee and Mayawati? That they're all women in politics? Think again - do they sound like men?
What are the similarities between Indira Gandhi, Mamta Banerjee and Mayawati? That they’re all women in politics? Think again – do they sound like men?
It is an established fact that women in Indian politics are a minority. Even after several years of independence, the dream of gender equality remains distant.
In 2019, only 9% of women MLAs and MPs represent almost half the population of India, according to the Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR) and National Election Watch. Even these 9% have to adopt men like attributes to stay relevant in the politics.
Speeches, Interviews and media interactions are the key factors in political communication. How do women talk during these interactions? Do they behave like men?
In the book The Silent Sex by Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg, it has been portrayed that women in politics tend to acquire masculine styles of communication to sound assertive.
For instance Indira Gandhi, Mamta Banerjee and Mayawati, are some of the big names in Indian politics, who have always been associated with strong character and men like traits.
When you look at them you will find some common traits – single status, short hair, and a strong opinionated voice. Similarly in world politics, there is Hillary Clinton, one of the prominent names in American politics, who has always been in the news for her hard policy stands.
In a Washington Post story, it was reported that Hillary has over the years started to speak more like men. The linguists observed that she has started using more male vocabulary than the one which is associated with females. One of the classic examples of this trend is Margaret Thatcher, who was voice trained to lower the pitch of her voice, so as to make her voice more authoritative.
When they join politics, women enter the world of males. They become iconoclasts, who have broken the myth of the society that women are not made for politics.
Even after breaking this code of conduct, their war does not end. At every point they have to fight with the gender prejudices that exist in politics.
Being a part of a minority is one the major reasons behind this. There are fewer women in the Parliament, State Legislatures and other political organisations, which gives them a natural disadvantage. Even when they talk about issues they relate to, they have to sound more commanding to make their voice count.
In many cases, they have to support the majority in some controversial decisions to bargain for their political success. The fear of public ridicule and lack of confidence are also some of the reasons behind women’s silence in the political arena.
Leaders like Indira Gandhi are an anomaly in the Indian politics, who made it to the top because of their strong and masculine characteristics. One thing that has widely has been witnessed is that voters also have a bias towards gender.
While women adopt masculine traits to make a point, voters on the other hand treat it like a blunder. Women in politics are called bold, those who broke the limits of womanly character. Thus, a number of voters tend not to vote for them.
Women are predisposed to generally be soft spoken and polite whereas the women in Indian politics are usually quite the opposite. Do women have to appear men like and sound like them as well, for political gains? Why can’t women be accepted in politics for the feminine qualities?
Politics is still a male dominated arena where woman will take years to make a significant place. The small proportion of women in politics is also like a caged animal, who can only talk the tongue of men. Had there been true independence, the women reservation bill would have been passed long back.
This phenomenon is widely studied in American politics but is under-reported in Indian politics. While assumptions are made about women in politics, a comprehensive study was never done to analyse this particular trend.
Even after having some representation in politics, women are still excluded from it because of these reasons. Women as the other gender is not accepted in politics, neither by fellow male politicians and nor by biased voters.
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
I am a student, pursuing my Ph.D. A person changes with every new morning, experience and problem, so do I. I believe in ubiquity, and I really do not know how it can read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: