Check out these 5 useful tips for a blissful career!
Yet another allegation of sexual harassment against a Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi begs the question - will this top judiciary body remain the safe space it should be to demand justice?
Yet another allegation of sexual harassment against a Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi begs the question – will this top judiciary body remain the safe space it should be to demand justice?
A former junior court assistant at the Supreme Court of India in an affidavit on Friday, April 19, wrote to 22 judges of the apex court making allegations of sexual harassment by the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi at his residence office on October 10 and 11, 2018.
The apex court had a special hearing on Saturday to deal with a “matter of great public importance touching upon the independence of judiciary”. This ex-employee also alleged that she was subjected to vendetta and persecution after that.
During the hearing in CJI’s court No. 1 today Justice Gogoi denied the allegations. “This is unbelievable. I don’t think I should stoop low even to deny these allegations,” he said, adding, “There has to be bigger force behind this, they want to deactivate the office of CJI.”
The Court also called upon “the wisdom of media to act responsibly on allegations of sexual harassment against the CJI”. Amidst the ironic situation where the accused CJI shall preside over the court and is expected to discharge his judicial functions without fear or prejudice, this isn’t the first time sexual harassment has been a topic of concern at the highest judicial body of India.
In 2013, former Supreme Court judge Ashok Kumar Ganguly was accused by a woman intern on charges of sexual harassment and later in 2014 another former Supreme Court Judge Swatanter Kumar was accused of sexual harassment by a woman law student.
In 2016 India’s first woman additional solicitor-general and the first-ever woman to become senior advocate in the Bombay High Court, Indira Jaisingh, had also made allegations of being sexual harassed in the precincts of the Supreme Court but without naming anyone or pointing to any specific incident.
It is an open secret that just like all other institutions in our country, our judiciary isn’t an enabling or safe space for women and has displayed its sexist and misogynist tendencies often, whether it is in the form of rampant sexist remarks and stands regarding disputed matters like a law against marital rape or in various instances of sexual crimes.
In the light of such allegations Indian women are bound to scrutinise their equal legal rights in this democracy and feel threatened as some of the institutions that are meant to defend these rights seem to be encroaching on them.
The secretary general of the Supreme Court of India has called the recent allegations false, scurrilous and totally denied these. The statement went on to say that the woman and her family had criminal antecedents. The Lok Sabha elections are on in India in phases and in such a politically charged environment in all likelihood the undue politicisation of such a sensitive and shocking sexual harassment case is also likely.
Though this matter is now sub-judice, it has once again highlighted the lack of transparency in some of the highest institutions that we have. The Supreme Court which is undoubtedly one of India’s most vital public institutions must act in a manner to restore the faith of its common people in the judiciary and the justice system.
A three-member in-house enquiry committee of the Supreme Court, has found no substance in the complaint of sexual harassment made by a former Supreme Court employee against the Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi. The committee consisting of Justices S.A Bobde, Indira Banerjee and Indu Malhotra through a note released to the public by the Secretary General of the Supreme Court, said the findings of the report would be not be made public.
Image source: YouTube
Pooja Priyamvada is an author, columnist, translator, online content & Social Media consultant, and poet. An awarded bi-lingual blogger she is a trained psychological/mental health first aider, mindfulness & grief facilitator, emotional wellness trainer, reflective read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
For International Day of Elimination of Violence Against Women, let's look at how we 'accept' mothers who avenge violence against their kids, but not wives who fight back.
The silver screen is replete with depictions of male rage and men engaging in violence, but when women engage in violence, even when it is reactionary violence, it doesn’t sit right with us. We allow mothers (as portrayed in Sridevi’s Mom and Raveena Tandon’s Maatr) to avenge their daughters and resort to violence when all else fails, but when the abuser is an intimate partner, the rules appear to be different.
Depictions of female rage on screen garner mixed reactions. We root for protagonists and films we agree with like Mom or Maatr, but there are also films like Darlings which drew flak for its depictions of reactionary violence.
This begs the question, which women on screen are allowed to fight back and why do we root for some of these characters while refusing to see where others come from?
This Generation To Generation Violence towards A Daughter-in-law Needs To Stop!
It is ironic how women in the same home do not think twice before harassing a woman who left her parents and family behind to live with her husband.
“My daughter needs a husband who listens to her. He should leave his family to stay with her after marriage. He should be well-off and not let her do chores.”
“I also need an obedient daughter-in-law, who will be an unpaid servant and a punching bag who shouldn’t have a life of her own.”
Please enter your email address