If you want to understand how to become better allies to people with disabilities, then join us at Embracing All Abilities: Including People with Disabilities at Work.
War movies like Uri glorify the dehumanisation of soldiers and their targets, no matter how patriotic we feel about them. Is this what we want to teach our kids?
About half a year ago, I remember walking out of a cinema hall, feeling heavy-hearted. I’d just watched Raazi, and the sheer futility of war hit me right in the face. Today, I walked out of the same cinema hall that showed another film: Uri, and walked out with the same feeling of heaviness in my heart.
Uri tells the story of the violent difference between India and Pakistan – these are violent conflicts at work, just that they aren’t open wars in the way that we know wars to be. And in this understanding, men exchange fire, knife the life out of one another, throw grenades into enemy quarters, and set fire to property they don’t own on screen.
In these moments, they all blur into one another: an amorphous assortment of flesh and fire, loud voices and gunshots.
In these moments, they’re all dehumanized.
Think about it, if you’ve watched the film: isn’t it a shock to see the hate in Vicky Kaushal’s character’s eyes as he sprays bullets in a scene that comes closely at the heels of another where he has nothing but pure love for his mother, who is struggling to get out of Alzheimer’s grasp? Isn’t it absolutely chilling to see Yami Gautam’s character unflinchingly torturing a man as she interrogates him – just a few scenes after she gently reads a story out to a grandmother and a grandchild curled up in bed? This arguably speaks volumes of Vicky Kaushal’s and Yami Gautam’s acting skills – but that’s not what this is about.
To see a child cry out in agony at the loss of her father to violent conflict is nothing shy of heartrending – because this cry could belong to a child anywhere: Kashmir, Palestine, Syria, Yemen… And it is this that makes you find this dehumanization to be scary: very, very scary.
One of the early things we learn in our lives is that practice makes perfect – or at least near perfect. It is this unrelenting practice of violence that has led us to get better at it: sophisticated armaments, unfathomable depths of tools for espionage and monitoring, high-precision weapons and much more. If we’d given peace as much of a chance as we’ve given violence, our lands would be a lot less red.
Films like Raazi and Uri speak to a particular idea of patriotic fervor and nationalism – ideas and beliefs that anyone is free to espouse, so no questions there. But they are also films that lead you to reflect: especially on the bigger picture if you’re willing to pay attention. I’m willing to bet that a majority of us in the cinema halls watching this film have no experience of what it is to live life in a war zone.
We don’t know what it is to be confined indoors for fear of someone opening fire, or for fear of stepping on something that could explode. We don’t recognize the privilege we enjoy. We forget that the wars waged across borders drawn on maps are fought by foot soldiers on ground, and commandeered by a battalion sitting in air conditioned rooms who are fully in their power to turn those very rooms into negotiation tables. And so, when we are shown a film in under three hours, we forget to notice the underlying subtext that we should be taking home.
These films lead us to question our violent, warlike ways: if only we are listening. But, theatres full of people that applauded the film in the end seem to reiterate that we don’t seem to be likely to abandon violence as our preferred mode of engagement.
Down the aisle in the row that I sat, was a little boy of five. Dressed in red, he sat deep inside an enormous seat that nearly swallowed him. For parts of the film that I couldn’t palate, I would bend down, looking at my knees, the walls on the side – anywhere but the screen. And in many of those moments, I found this little boy sitting on the edge of the seat, lapping up the goings-on on screen. My heart sank at the sight of him being served up so much violence on screen. As I queued to leave, I heard him tell his father, “Main soldier ban ke sab ko shoot karunga!” Raucous laughter followed from his parents and their friends.
My heart shattered to a hundred pieces as I left the hall.
Image source: a still from the movie Uri: A Surgical Strike
read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Rajshri Deshpande, who played the fiery protagonist in Trial by Fire along with Abhay Deol speaks of her journey and her social work.
Rajshri Deshpande as the protagonist in ‘Trial by Fire’, the recent Netflix show has received raving reviews along with the show itself for its sensitive portrayal of the Uphaar Cinema Hall fire tragedy, 1997 and its aftermath.
The limited series is based on the book by the same name written by Neelam and Shekhar Krishnamoorthy, who lost both their children in the tragedy. We got an opportunity to interview Rajshri Deshpande who played Neelam Krishnamoorthy, the woman who has been relentlessly crusading in the court for holding the owners responsible for the sheer negligence.
Rajshri Deshpande is more than an actor. She is also a social warrior, the rare celebrity from the film industry who has also gone back to her roots to give to poverty struck farming villages in her native Marathwada, with her NGO Nabhangan Foundation. Of course a chance to speak with her one on one was a must!
“What is a woman’s job, Ramesh? Taking care of parents-in-law, husband, children, home and things at work—all at the same time? She isn’t God or a superhuman."
The arrays of workstations were occupied by people peering into their computer screens. The clicks of keyboard keys were punctuated by the occasional footsteps moving around to brainstorm or collaborate with colleagues in their cubicles. Most employees went about their tasks without looking at the person seated on either side of their workstation. Meenakshi was one of them.
The thirty-one-year-old marketing manager in a leading eCommerce company in India sat straight in her seat, her eyes on the screen, her fingers punching furiously into the keys. She was in a flow and wanted to finish the report while the thoughts and words were coming effortlessly into her mind.
Natu-Natu. The mellifluous ringtone interrupted her thoughts. She frowned at her mobile phone with half a mind to keep it ringing until she noticed the caller’s name on the screen, making her pick up the phone immediately.
Please enter your email address