If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Recently, my mother had to face gender discrimination while entering a temple in Himachal Pradesh, despite the Supreme Court's orders.
Recently, my mother had to face gender discrimination while entering a temple in Himachal Pradesh, despite the Supreme Court’s orders to not restrict women under any circumstances from entering and worshipping inside Hindu temples.
“The women’s right to worship is a constitutional one and it does not depend on laws. Once you open for public, anybody can go. If there is a temple, then it is a public place and everyone is allowed to go there, women can also go. Every woman is also the creation of God and why should there be discrimination against them in employment or worship? All persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion. This means your right as a woman to pray is not dependent on a legislation. It is your constitutional right”.
The Supreme Court’s recent observations are highly commendable, yet, the big revolutionary change is still a distant dream when it comes to eradication of deep rooted gender biases, especially in the context of religious practices in this nation. Here, the woman in question was my own mother. As she went to visit the famous Baba Balak Nath temple situated in Deotsidh in the Hamirpur district of Himachal Pradesh, my mother was barred from entering the temple’s main shrine following the age old practice of women devotees being restricted from doing so.
The temple has followed this centuries old tradition where women were not allowed to enter the cave. They pay obeisance and have darshan from a raised platform, a few meters away from the cave. The temple that is visited by a number of devotees every year holds special significance as the deity is considered to be the incarnation of Lord Kartikeya (the elder son of Lord Shiva) and is believed to have been a brahmachari (bachelor) throughout his life. According to the old tales, since the temple’s construction, locals preferred that women should not go close to him and that became a tradition followed till date. Therefore, women were never permitted to go near the idol or touch it.
However, after the Supreme Court’s historical verdict in the Shani Shingnapur temple where the ban on entry of women in the premises was finally lifted, other such temples in the country really didn’t follow the highest Court’s orders. Well, in my mother’s case, even after the government controlled Sidh Baba Balak Nath Temple had decided two years ago to permit women in the sanctum sanctorum, the practical implementation was nowhere to be seen. Nonetheless, my 67 year old mother fought against the odds. She went on to register a complaint with the temple authorities. Eventually, after over an hour’s discussion and drama, she was allowed to visit the main idol and worship.
I am happy and proud that my aware and educated mother took up the cudgels to raise her voice against such centuries old discriminatory practices being carried out in the name of tradition that have only intensified the regressive approach to gender equality. The entire episode, however, leaves me surprised at the utter disrespect of the Court’s orders. And although, the resilient conformists of these so-called religious high seats will never be able to change their orthodox mindsets, the struggle to wipe out gender disparity should not cease.
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
I writer by 'will' , 'destiny' , 'genes', & 'profession' love to write as it is the perfect food for my soul's hunger pangs'.
Writing since the age of seven, beginning with poetry, freelancing, scripting and read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
People have relationships without marriages. People cheat. People break up all the time. Just because two people followed some rituals does not make them more adept at tolerating each other for life.
Why is that our society defines a woman’s success by her marital status? Is it an achievement to get married or remain married? Is it anybody’s business? Are people’s lives so hollow that they need someone’s broken marriage to feel good about themselves?
A couple of months ago, I came across an article titled, “Shweta Tiwari married for the third time.” When I read through it, the article went on to clarify that the picture making news was one her one of her shows, in which she is all set to marry her co-star. She is not getting married in real life.
Fair enough. But why did the publication use such a clickbait title that was so misleading? I guess the thought of a woman marrying thrice made an exciting news for them and their potential readers who might click through.
Did the creators of Masaba Masaba just wake up one morning, go to the sets and decide to create something absolutely random without putting any thought into it?
Anyone who knows about Neena Gupta’s backstory would say that she is a boss lady, a badass woman, and the very definition of a feminist. I would agree with them all.
However, after all these decades of her working in the Indian film industry, is her boldness and bravery the only things worth appreciating?
The second season of Masaba Masaba (2020-2022) made me feel as if both Neena Gupta and her daughter Masaba have gotten typecast when it comes to the roles they play on screen. What’s more is that the directors who cast them have stopped putting in any effort to challenge the actors, or to make them deliver their dialogues differently.