Do you have that strong spirited woman who has helped/ enabled you during that phase of life when you needed some strong support? Tell us about her! We’d like to feature them. Read how.
All the sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 mentioned below are the ones under which (according to media reports) the Guwahati goons have been booked; all these sections of the IPC are bailable, that is, the accused have the right to be released on bail, and that the accused need not be forwarded to a court to seek bail, an officer in-charge of a police station can bail them out after seeking a personal bond and/or surety from them. Even some traffic violations are looked at more seriously by the law.
And I am amazed that almost no one has thought to look into the fact that it is so easy to molest a woman in this country and to get away with it- the law is completely in favor of the molesters (NCW, are you listening?). I have taken the Guwahati molestation as a test case.
Section 341 (Wrongful restraint)
Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term, which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
Wrongfully restraining a person gets the offender a month in jail; wrongfully retraining an animal gets him three months (Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, section 11 f)
Section 143 (Unlawful assembly)
Whoever is a member of an unlawful assembly shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six month, or with fine, or with both.
The blood-thirsty riotous mob that assaulted the hapless girl in Guwahati was not booked for rioting, which carries imprisonment for one year. Wasn’t this mob riotous? Section 146 of the Indian Penal Code defines rioting as “Whenever force or violence is used by an unlawful assembly, or by any member thereof, in prosecution of the common object of such assembly, every member of such assembly is guilty of the offence of rioting.” This section could have been read with section 34, IPC (common intent) and 120B, IPC (criminal conspiracy).
Section 294 (Obscene act)
Obscene acts and songs.—Whoever, to the annoyance of others-
(a) does any obscene act in any public place, or
(b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.
Well, a man can be obscene, nasty and insensitive to a woman in public, harass her, tease her, and be crude and crass, all he gets is three months in jail; but if someone is caught selling, renting out, circulating, etc. “a book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation, figure or any other object…deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to the pruri¬ent interest…” (note the tone of moral policing here), gets two years in jail for the first offence and five years for any subsequent offence (Indian Penal Code, section 292).
Section 323 (Voluntarily causing hurt)
Whoever, except in the case provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
There is an escape clause here in section 334. It says, “Whoever voluntarily causes hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.” All that the accused need to do is to malign the girl, shift the blame to her, prove, through a smart lawyer that they were provoked.
Section 354 (Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty)
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
If a man criminally assault a woman, he get jailed for two years; if he steals anything- could be a hundred rupees- he goes to jail for three years, and the offence of stealing is non-bailable. (Indian Penal Code, section 379; also if someone steals anything from a ‘dwelling house’, the jail term goes up to seven years- Indian Penal Code, section 380)
All the arrested Guwahati goons will be roaming free by now, all bailed out because the law says so.
I am a former bureaucrat, and have worked a lot on gender issues, disaster management
wow, thanks, now this makes sense to me.!
Ironically , While the men involved will walk away free in a few months, the victim will be labelled the ‘ Guwahati molestation victim ‘ for many years, maybe even her lifetime.
Thanks, Rashmi. Not in a few months- as per the law, they must have gotten bail in their first appearance in court. It is one of the ironies of our system that the victim stays labeled for life while the perpetrators are forgotten!
this is quite shameful, our country must work on matters as important as this.
Yes, absolutely. The NCW should try and get the laws made more stringent rather than wasting time making inane suggestions and putting its foot in its mouth.
Thank You for the good work you are doing & the awareness you are making Sir.
We salute you!
The offense has been made Bailable on two counts 1. There are chances that women may file a false complaint against the person whom either she or her any relative want to implicate for some of their personal and selfish interest. 2. There is no question of tampering with evidence by the Molester.
If you look at the Laws been amended since last ten years it has become harassment to Men. Again its many a times has been proved that women’s have started filing forge cases & therefore the view of the Court has been changed slightly including lady judges.
Even if the Guwahati molesters have got Bail that doesn’t mean that they are not guilty. After trial if found guilty they will get full punishment. So your comment ‘Molest and get away is wrong’
There are many views on the incident why the molestations are happening. There are maximum people including Women’s are accusing the Girl on the point that what she was doing there at late night in the costume? Now this mentality though not accepted but its existence cannot be denied. We can’t say that people of India are now so well educated that they will not do such kind of act. Still Saree and Salwar Pant is considered as our culture. If someone is trying foreign culture then people of India are not ready to accept except some Metropolitan cities.
Things could have been different if our female leaders like Sonia Gandhi, Mayawati, Jaylalita, Mamta Banerjee, Sushma Swaraj and Vrinda Karat or say for any senior member of NCW start wearing foreign costumes but they don’t. Reason is simple they know what is Indian culture and what is decent culture and how they will get respect.
I don’t think this deserves a reply. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, my friend.
Thanks for writing about this.
Pingback: What Are Their Thoughts? | Women's Web: Online Community For Indian Women
What if a woman falsely blame on a guy for molestation?
The Curious Case Of Pragya Singh Thakur – How Does She Do This?
The National Commission For What?
Court [Movie Review]
2,590 Days Post The Horrific Nirbhaya Incident, Can We Expect Justice?
Get our weekly mailer and never miss out on the best reads by and about women!