If you want to understand how to become better allies to people with disabilities, then join us at Embracing All Abilities: Including People with Disabilities at Work.
Mainstream Feminism is a ripe field for exploitation under capitalism, where 'feminist' goods hide the exploitation of those creating this merchandise.expl
Mainstream Feminism is a ripe field for exploitation under capitalism, where ‘feminist’ goods hide the exploitation of those creating this merchandise.
A lot of influential people are filling the cultural vacuum when it comes to making a statement on feminism. It is necessary to make your voice count, given how absolutely significant women’s issues are. It is a completely different ballgame to make a career out of the cause of feminism with profit-oriented motives.
Selling music albums, movies, books, and clothing lines adorned with feminist slogans like “We Should All Be Feminists” is actually reducing the whole movement to a sleek marketing strategy for big corporations to profit from. This practice of wearing feminist brands and slogans benefits only the companies selling those products in the name of women’s empowerment.
Over a period of the past decade and a half, feminism and its core issues have become the focal point of intense scrutiny and speculation. In public discourses, the issue has often been denigrated as well. Today, terms like toxic-masculinity and male-feminist are included in every other discussion. Thousands of magazines, articles, op-ed pieces, thesis, gender studies, broadcast shows, and books have turned this concept, once regarded as radical misandry, into a current interest topic for common people with a consistently growing and committed support base.
As with the rise of any other movement, feminism today is riding the wave as a much sought after commodity. Businesses and celebrities are branding themselves as prominent feminists. Books and music records addressing feminism are becoming best sellers. TED talks and digital content discussing women’s rights and liberation are going viral.
Entertainment and glamour industries are jumping the bandwagon by putting appealing faces on overpriced T-shirts for the cause and borrowing catchy words from celebrity social media. In an already media-saturated and consumer-driven world, feminism has become a glamorous topic to discuss. Phrases like “Feminist af” or “Girl power” do little/nothing to challenge the status quo. These fashion brands do little/nothing to improve the lives of their female employees. However, they all preach “WE SHOULD ALL BE FEMINIST” through capitalized feminism.
The capitalistic machine is one that runs on neither morality nor justice. It runs on cold, hard cash alone. It has reduced feminism to “this season’s must-haves” and a morally corrupt version of the cause that fails to give justice to the marginalized.
Do you remember the desperate plea of ZARA’s workforce comprising mainly women? “I made this item you are going to buy, but I didn’t get paid for it”
ZARA’s parent company Inditex, (the largest fashion retailer in the world), was one of the first few organizations that branded themselves as allies to the feminist movement, along with GAP, Mango and NEXT. More than a year after this issue came to light, these workers were still signing petitions that said: “For 12 months, we waited for the conclusion of these negotiations with patience and hope. To prevent any disruptions to the negotiations, we endured them in silence. However, after an entire year, the brands declared that they will only pay just over a quarter of our claim. In other words, the brand accepted their liability, but they thought we deserve no more than their scarps.“
That is how these multinational, feminist brands keep on generating revenues and profits off the most marginalized. These are the harsh realities of capitalistic feminism that become more prominent when we find that the world’s top celebrities and even royalty are endorsing and supporting the same ZARA.
Both Gawker Media and The Daily Mail reported about Ed & Harriet’s company where “women … who were hired to make shirts that read ‘This is what feminist looks like’ have been paid a dollar an hour to do so and sleep in dormitories that housed 16 women at a time.” The cruel irony of it! What is so feminist about celebrities who then wear and model these garments?
Or about these few which mention so many well-known women:
Jennifer Lopez’s women empowerment song “I ain’t your mama” was produced by Lukasz Sebastian Gottwald. He is also known as Dr. Luke, who was sued by another American singer, Kesha Rose Sebert for “sexually, physically, verbally and emotionally abusing her to the point where she nearly lost her life”.
Look at Beyonce’s Ivy Park clothing line using sweatshop labor in Sri Lanka (sweatshop: a workplace of oppressive conditions that employs workers, including child labor to work long hours on low wages under abusive management).
Or Ivanka Trump’s line of clothing that is selling a lot of money-spinning slogans that are aligned with feminism. Though simultaneously, there is also a violation of women’s rights at her fashion label’s factory in Subang, Indonesia, where women are employed on the lowest possible wages and bribed with petty “benefits” to work away from their maternity leaves.
Celebrity feminism serves as a smokescreen to perpetuate capitalism and a system of oppression which, in turn, accommodates them to exploit people (woman, man, and children alike) in other countries. How is one particular woman earning a massive amount of money communally advancing for all women? What it does instead is that it actively undermines the idea of a pro-women future where all women see their lives enriched and improved. No woman’s ambitions are automatically feminist by virtue of her gender alone.
Feminism is so much more. It is about putting the most deprived among us first, about remaking the society on domestic, sexual and economic levels. It is a lot more than #Metoo and being selective.
Image source: videoblocks
I'm a freelance technical writer with a passion to write on the subjects of cybersecurity, futuristic technology, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data science. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
What I loved was how there is so much in the movie of the SRK we have known, and also a totally new star. The gestures, the smile, the wit and the charisma are all too familiar, but you also witness a rawness, an edginess.
When a movie that got the entire nation in a twist – for the right and wrong reasons – hits the theatres, there is bound to be noise. From ‘I am going to watch it – first day first show’ to ‘Boycott the movie and make it a flop’, social media has been a furore of posts.
Let me get one thing straight here – I did not watch Pathaan to make a statement or to simply rebel as people would put it. I went to watch it for the sheer pleasure of witnessing my favourite superstar in all his glory being what he is best at being – his magnificent self. Because when it comes to screen presence, he burns it, melts it and then resurrects it as well like no other. Because when it comes to style and passion, he owns it like a boss. Because SRK is, in a way, my last connecting point to the girl that I once was. Though I have evolved into so many more things over the years, I don’t think I am ready to let go of that girl fully yet.
There is no elephant in the room really here because it’s a fact that Bollywood has a lot of cleaning up to do. Calling out on all the problematic aspects of the industry is important and in doing that, maintaining objectivity is also equally imperative. I went for Pathaan for entertainment and got more than I had hoped for. It is a clever, slick, witty, brilliantly packaged action movie that delivers what it promises to. Logic definitely goes flying out of the window at times and some scenes will make you go ‘kuch bhi’ , but the screenplay clearly reminds you that you knew all along what you were in for. The action sequences are lavish and someone like me who is not exactly a fan of this genre was also mind blown.
Recent footage of her coming out of an airport had comments preaching karma and its cruel ways, that Samantha "deserved her illness" because she filed for divorce.
Samantha Ruth Prabhu fell from being the public’s sweetheart to a villain overnight because she filed for divorce. The actress was struck with myositis post divorce, much to the joy of certain groups (read sexist) in our society.
A troll responded to Samantha’s tweet, “Women Rising!!” by adding to it “just to fall”. She replied, “Getting back up makes it all the more sweeter, my friend.”
Here’s another insensitive tweet by BuzZ Basket showing fake concern for her autoimmune disease. “Feeling sad for Samantha, she lost all her charm and glow. When everyone thought she came out of divorce strongly and her professional life was seeing heights, myositis hit her badly, making her weak again.” Samantha responded, “I pray you never have to go through months of treatment and medication like I did. And here’s some love from me to add to your glow.”
Please enter your email address