Keen to learn more about inclusive workplaces? Want to be inclusive of the LGBTQ+ community? Learn more & request an invitation for a very special 2-hour session here!
The Supreme Court's verdict on Section 377 has brought joy to all of those who support our right to equality. Here are some of the most inspiring quotes giving us clarity about this positive judgement.
The Supreme Court’s verdict on Section 377 has brought in joy to many people and couples who don’t fall in the LGBTQ spectrum, and all of those who support their right to equality. Here are some of the most inspiring quotes giving us clarity about this positive judgement.
Years of fighting has finally paid off. India is now one among the 25 countries of the world where love between people of the same gender is legally accepted. As long as there is consent for the same from both the parties, none can stop them from falling in love or being in a relationship. It is indeed a historic judgement by the Supreme Court of India.
Here are 12 quotes related to the same judgement, to help us get a better insight as to what the verdict actually meant.
First, a few of the most inspiring quotes from the written judgement itself.
“Consensual sex between adults in a private space, which is not harmful to women or children, cannot be denied as it is a matter of individual choice. Section 377 results in discrimination and is violative of constitutional principles.”
“Section 377 reveals only the hatred, revulsion and disgust of the draftsmen towards certain intimate choices of fellow human beings.”
“An individual’s sexuality cannot be put into boxes or compartmentalizes; it should rather be viewed as fluid, granting the individual the freedom to ascertain her own desires and proclivities.”
“Human sexuality cannot be reduced to a binary formulation. Nor can it be defined narrowly in terms of its function as a means to procreation. To confine it to closed categories would result in denuding human liberty of its full content as a constitutional right.”
“Consensual sexual relationships between adults, based on the human propensity to experience desire must be treated with respect. In addition to respect for relationships based on consent, it is important to foster a society where individuals find the ability for unhindered expression of the love that they experience towards their partner.”
“Punishment under Section 377 made the LGBT a closeted community, destroyed the identity of members and reached their dignity, all part of right to life.”
“The law must be interpreted as per the requirement of changing times.”
The judgement on Section 377 was passed by a bench of 5 judges comprising of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra at the lead, Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra. Here are few quotes from these judges.
“Section 377 is irrational, arbitrary and incomprehensible as it fetters the right to equality for LGBT community… LGBT community possesses same equality as other citizens.”
“Social morality cannot violate the rights of even one single individual,”
“History owes an apology to members of LGBT community and their families for ostracisation and persecution they faced because of society’s ignorance that homosexuality is a natural trait; its penal suppression infringes a host of fundamental rights.”
“Homosexuality is not a mental disorder, which has been also recognised by Parliament. Centre must give wide periodic publicity to the SC judgment to eliminate stigma attached to LGBT community.”
“State has no business to get into controlling the private lives of LGBT community members or for that matter, any citizen.” Also, “decriminalising gay sex is only the first step to bury the Colonial Ghost, adding that time has come to move forward and give the LGBT community the other constitutional rights.”
Images Source – Unsplash, Pixabay
Apart from being the Associate Editor at Women's Web, where I get to read, edit and write a lot of interesting articles, my life is simple. It begins at 'M' (Movies) and ends with ' read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, indivisual posts do not necessarily represent the platofrom's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Dushyanta clearly remembered everything. But he didn't have any intention to accept a poor woman from a remote hermitage as his wife and her son as theirs.
Dushyanta clearly remembered everything. But he didn’t have any intention to accept a poor woman from a remote hermitage as his wife and her son as theirs.
She sat motionless on the royal bed, her knees drawn up to her chin, staring vacantly outside the palace window.
She was sheathed in exquisite scarlet red silk, shot through with golden threads forming intricate traditional patterns. Chests of gems and jewellery were strewn all over the bed. The maids were fussing over whether a diamond-studded necklace would suit their queen or a gold choker would look better. Another younger maid was arranging her tresses in a coiffeur.
Actor Siddharth sent out a distasteful tweet in response to a tweet by Saina Nehwal, in what he thought were clever words, but this slur on any woman is not acceptable.
Trust me when I say I’ve run out of patience in stopping myself from calling this ‘liberal’, self-proclaimed feminist actor out umpteen times in the past.
Let me count them out for you.
Remember the revolutionary lawyers Arundhati Katju and Menaka Guruswamy who fought against the archaic section 377? Now they have inspired us even more - by coming out as a couple.
Remember the revolutionary lawyers Arundhati Katju and Menaka Guruswamy who fought against the archaic section 377? Now they have inspired us even more – by coming out as a couple.
The fight against the archaic 157-year-old Section 377 that criminalised consensual homosexual relationships, was a long-term campaign. Among others, it was orchestrated by two amazing public-interest litigators, Arundhati Katju and Menaka Guruswamy. (Regular readers may recall reading about them in my piece on 8 stellar female advocates in India).
In September 2018, India truly embraced the concept of equality when a five-judge panel of the Supreme Court struck down this law. Menaka Guruswamy and Arundhati Katju played a very important role in fighting against the archaic law.
The year 2018 has seen many historic judgments and decisions that will pave the way for equality in Indian society. As we near the end of the year, here's a look at these historic decisions.
The year 2018 has seen many historic judgments and decisions that will pave the way for equality in Indian society. As we near the end of the year, here’s a look at these historic decisions.
Women and people from marginalised communities have faced discrimination in the form of deep-rooted patriarchy, as well as centuries old laws that needed revamp or even complete revoking. 2018 has birthed a few jaw dropping judgments that shook the privileged patriarchal society, and moved women and minorities closer to the land of the free.
Some of the archaic laws had barred women and minorities from exercising their rights, colliding with the fundamental rights, which can’t be taken away by any other law. These discrepancies were addressed in the recent judgments, opening more arguments about other patriarchal and archaic laws, and giving hope to women, and to the marginalised communities that their freedom and rights can be restored.