Over the years, your support has made Women’s Web the leading resource for women in India. Now, it is our turn to ask, how can we make this even more useful for you? Please take our short 5 minute questionnaire – your feedback is important to us!
A new proposed law in Maharashtra calls for mandatory sex determination testing of pregnant women, shifting the burden from doctors and officials to women with little choice.
Then one day some bigwig was offended by the rising number of burglaries in his district and how the statistics made him look bad – so the local law enforcement officials suddenly woke up and decided to take action. Suppose they decided that every one of you in the society would have your apartments continuously monitored by CCTV, including the bathrooms, just on the off chance a burglar gets caught on camera. Then would you stand for such idiocy?
Yet this is the exact variety of idiocy that a new proposed law hopes to achieve. But don’t worry. It won’t inconvenience everybody. Only pregnant women will suffer, but who cares about them anyway?
The government wants pregnant women to undergo mandatory (since when have women had a say in anything) sex determination tests, and then wants to continually monitor these women to find out what happens to the foetus.
Never mind the gross violation of privacy of pregnant women at a time they are emotionally vulnerable, but has the practicality of monitoring lakhs of pregnant women even been considered? And what happens when the system fails and families who know the sex of the foetus ostracise the pregnant woman, or beat her until she has a miscarriage?
Why does every solution to the gender ratio problem involve trampling on the rights of women, when they are usually the victims? And what exactly is the point of creating new more impinging, and clumsy laws when the ones present are not being implemented?
And this is not all. What about the women who need to have abortions for reasons that have nothing to do with sex selection? It is already difficult for pregnant teens to get safe abortions and this kind of a law is going to make it a lot harder for them.
It is also going to be harder to obtain abortions in case of genetic disorders, if even a legal abortion gets linked to sex selection. On the other hand knowing the sex of the foetus makes female foeticide more likely and those availing of sex selective abortions could use genetic defects or medical complications as an excuse.
Besides, monitoring families of pregnant women by corrupt government officials can result in widespread blackmail and extortion. How can private lives of citizens be brought under government scrutiny?
Finally why make women pay for the flaws of a patriarchal society? Haven’t they suffered enough? Why not monitor law enforcement officials instead, to ensure every complaint about dowry, rape and forced female foeticide is taken seriously and protection and safe haven like shelters are provided for women who make the complaints? Why not fast track the judicial process for handling these cases? It can’t be less practical than monitoring all the pregnant women. Ethically speaking too, it is better to monitor people in their government jobs, rather than pregnant women in their private lives.
Women are already blamed for rape in this country. Now they are going to be penalised for female foeticide too. Why am I not surprised?
First published here.
Top image via Pixabay
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Kanika G, a physicist by training and a mother of 2 girls, started writing to entertain her older daughter with stories, thus opening the flood gates on a suppressed passion. Today she has written over read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 might have had a box office collection of 260 crores INR and entertained Indian audiences, but it's full of problematic stereotypes.
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 starts with a scene in which the protagonist, Ruhaan (played by Kartik Aaryan) finds an abandoned pink suitcase in a moving cable car and thinks there was a bomb inside it.
Just then, he sees an unknown person (Kiara Advani) wave and gesture at him to convey that the suitcase was theirs. Ruhaan, with the widest possible smile, says, “Bomb mai bag nahi hai, bomb ka bag hai,” (There isn’t a bomb in the bag, the bag belongs to a bomb).
Who even writes such dialogues in 2022?
Most of us dislike being called aunty because of the problematic meanings attached to it. But isn't it time we accept growing old with grace?
Recently, during one of those deep, thoughtful conversations with my 3 y.o, I ended a sentence with “…like those aunty types.” I quickly clicked my tongue. I changed the topic and did everything in my hands to make her forget those last few words.
I sat down with a cup of coffee and drilled myself about how the phrase ‘aunty-type’ entered my lingo. I have been hearing this word ‘aunty’ a lot these days, because people are addressing me so.
Almost a year ago, I was traveling in a heavily-crowded bus and a college girl asked me “Aunty, can you please hold my bag?” It was the first time and I was first shocked and later offended. Then I thought about why I felt so.