If you want to understand how to become better allies to people with disabilities, then join us at Embracing All Abilities: Including People with Disabilities at Work.
The modern Indian girl 'of marriageable age' is accused of being "choosy" showing that girls in India are still seen as community property, not individuals
Those of us living in ‘modern’, urban areas like Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai or Bangalore sometimes have a tendency to gasp in horror at those uneducated, uncivilized masses living in places like the villages of Haryana and Punjab. How they treat their women, like cattle belonging to the family – mute sheep to be given away in the garb of marriage, to ‘suitable’ people chosen by the family or even killed for daring to defy marriage norms! Surely such things don’t happen in urban India, or at least not among ‘people like us’! Women here have choice, don’t they?
Well, my eyes were opened today when I happened to land upon a community portal (which I am not going to link to, they don’t need the publicity) – infact, a portal for the highly educated and upper-caste community I belong to. It may be true that women in urban India or at least the more educated parts of it have more choice – but this has been due to women fighting hard for those choices. No one gave it to them on a platter, and even now, many grudge them for it.
So, the hot topic of discussion that I happened to land upon was “matrimonial websites” and the discussion had basically come down to the fact that ‘modern girls’ were being too ‘choosy’ and ‘boys’ of the community were finding it difficult to get married. (Note, I shall continue using ‘girls’ and ‘boys’ as the terminology not because I think grown men and women need to be called that, but because this was the parlance on the portal and indeed is, in most arranged marriage related transactions).
A sample of the key accusations levelled at these girls were:
– Girls want the boy to be very highly qualified and earning a lot of money. In fact, boys earning below Rs.60,000 a month have little chance!
– Girls refuse to relocate if the boy is in a different city. They are already employed and will only look at boys in the same city. What will happen to boys in government or banks where there are frequent transfers if girls refuse to marry them?
– Girls rejected my son because he looks ‘orthodox’ (i.e. his photo carried religious/caste marks)
– Girls reject boys whose parents live with them, or even in the same city
– Girls rejected my son because is he is extremely tall/short/fat/thin
The common thread running through many of these posts was a sense of incredulity that girls should have any strong opinions or requirements of their own. This is not say that every criteria an individual has will necessarily make them happy; after all, marrying a person of a particular height or even income may not lead to compatibility. But that wasn’t the contention of these ‘elders’.
The fear expressed really was that boys of the community were finding it harder and harder to get married, and if such a state of things continued, what would happen to the future of the community? Many openly lamented that these girls had no sense of loyalty to the community and were happy to get married to a boy of their choice from another community. This was explained as ‘infatuation’ or ‘enticement’ by other communities since ‘our girls are well brought up’!
In other words, girls of 24 and older could not possibly make choices of their own, and it is not even considered desirable that they do. Members of this community don’t (in general) kill their daughters for marrying outside the community, but all the same, would you not say that girls are still considered the property of their families and communities? Regardless of the educational and employment qualifications, their primary value still lies in their wombs – as begetters of children for the community of the future, not as individuals with likes and dislikes of their own.
It may also interest you to know that some of the same ‘elders’ felt it was ‘ok’ (though still not a great option) if boys of the community chose girls from outside – since those girls could be ‘trained’ to take on the habits and traditions of women in the community and pass on the same to children.
Pic credit: Shrini Photography (used under a Creative Commons license)
Founder & Chief Editor of Women's Web, Aparna believes in the power of ideas and conversations to create change. She has been writing since she was ten. In another life, she used to be read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Rajshri Deshpande, who played the fiery protagonist in Trial by Fire along with Abhay Deol speaks of her journey and her social work.
Rajshri Deshpande as the protagonist in ‘Trial by Fire’, the recent Netflix show has received raving reviews along with the show itself for its sensitive portrayal of the Uphaar Cinema Hall fire tragedy, 1997 and its aftermath.
The limited series is based on the book by the same name written by Neelam and Shekhar Krishnamoorthy, who lost both their children in the tragedy. We got an opportunity to interview Rajshri Deshpande who played Neelam Krishnamoorthy, the woman who has been relentlessly crusading in the court for holding the owners responsible for the sheer negligence.
Rajshri Deshpande is more than an actor. She is also a social warrior, the rare celebrity from the film industry who has also gone back to her roots to give to poverty struck farming villages in her native Marathwada, with her NGO Nabhangan Foundation. Of course a chance to speak with her one on one was a must!
“What is a woman’s job, Ramesh? Taking care of parents-in-law, husband, children, home and things at work—all at the same time? She isn’t God or a superhuman."
The arrays of workstations were occupied by people peering into their computer screens. The clicks of keyboard keys were punctuated by the occasional footsteps moving around to brainstorm or collaborate with colleagues in their cubicles. Most employees went about their tasks without looking at the person seated on either side of their workstation. Meenakshi was one of them.
The thirty-one-year-old marketing manager in a leading eCommerce company in India sat straight in her seat, her eyes on the screen, her fingers punching furiously into the keys. She was in a flow and wanted to finish the report while the thoughts and words were coming effortlessly into her mind.
Natu-Natu. The mellifluous ringtone interrupted her thoughts. She frowned at her mobile phone with half a mind to keep it ringing until she noticed the caller’s name on the screen, making her pick up the phone immediately.
Please enter your email address