If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Raising your voice or being a go-getter at work always meant having the strength to put another person down for your own gain. But why should it be so?
Recently, a colleague completely lost it at me for a reason that was not warranted in the very least. This colleague was also a subordinate who has been taught to ‘be aggressive’. He realised after the fact that what he had done may have been a career suicide and I could sense his discomfort as he kept dodging my work calls for the next few days.
How did I tackle it? I took his address from one of his colleagues and sent him a small bouquet and a box of chocolates with a note that said “It’s okay.”
I could have shouted right back at him at the time of the incident. I could have told his reporting manager. I could have even gotten him suspended for “harassment”. Instead I chose peace. It is a choice. And it can be taught. And it can be learned.
While I had tried to “be aggressive” all my career, for the past 2 years I have refused to be. I am always polite and always kind. Even to people who are neither polite nor kind to me.
I have extended this behavior across teams, across departments, with my own boss and every place that I could. The results have been astounding. Not only has the productivity increased but the kinks and delays created due to falsified aggression have nearly gone away. People are friendlier, less angry, more relaxed and very driven. Suddenly, it feels like we’re all in the same team and we’re all working towards the same goal. These people have extended this “non-aggressive” stance in their own teams and I see them thriving.
I began my professional career about a decade ago. As I grew through the ranks, one ‘lesson’ that I was given over and over again was “be assertive”. As the years went by and I kept rising up, that ‘lesson’ morphed into “be aggressive”. I was told that the only way to survive in the corporate world was by being aggressive. “Always raise your voice” wasn’t said in the positive sense of standing up against what’s wrong or standing up for yourself. It meant having the strength to put another person down for your own gain.
My father has been in the corporate world for over 40 years and I have witnessed this soft-spoke man be forced to “be aggressive” against his innately tender nature. What I admired about him though, is that he continued to be kind to people whenever he could. He never let go of that. Of course, his inability to sufficiently “be aggressive” marred his chance to rise to the highest possible ranks because he wasn’t “cut-throat” enough.
This has been the one question I’ve been living with for almost a decade.
“Why are we so angry?”
Why is it a professional requirement to be angry? In one of my previous roles, I was forced to fire an agency. I didn’t mind the responsibility because I thought it would be an interesting experience to have and learn from. What irked me though was the fact that I was asked to “be aggressive” with them. They were generally a not-so-competent agency, but even so, there was no requirement for aggression. On another occasion, I had discovered that one of our agency partners wasn’t being completely honest in their business with us and I was made to witness how “aggressively” one of my bosses fired them and went to the level of threatening them with a lawsuit.
I am baffled by this need to “be aggressive” to survive the corporate world. Who started this trend? And why are we still following this sad norm?
Someone somewhere someday was angry with their life and vented out on their professional colleague and another someone deemed it as a “go-getter” and so the trend began. That is all that there is to it. There is no ‘science of aggression’ and it is not a tactic that they teach you in Business Schools. They do teach a semester of “Corporate Behavior” which has this watered down as “being assertive”.
A few years ago, I had an epiphany: I don’t “have” to be aggressive. Like my father, I am generally a soft-spoken person. Every time I shout at someone, I need to rush to the washroom after the confrontation to compose myself. I neither like to be shouted at nor do I like to shout on people.
We as humans like complacency. Questioning norms, breaking boundaries and breaking out of tradition is tedious. And so, we prefer to follow the herd rather than make our own way.
I believe there is an alternative. Aggression is okay, sometimes even warranted, when you’re trying to change the world, when you’re trying to make a difference. It is not required when you are giving feedback on a creative. Definitely not required when you’re reviewing someone’s performance.
A friend of mine recently shared an experience with me. An old teammate (subordinate) of his recently messaged him and here’s what the subordinate wrote:
“The kind of personal conversations you had with the teams, be it about their family, their personal life, their mental health, if they need to chill out, very few leaders do nowadays. It was so comfortable with you because you were so approachable and considerate. I have never seen any other Leaders do that in the agencies I’ve worked.”
“What would it take people to realise that Kindness costs nothing, even in a professional setting?”
There is a definite demand in the market for kindness, the profits are extraordinary and the supply is easy to provide with 0 production cost. So, why not?
“Be the change you want to see in the world”.
Why not start a new culture: “Don’t be aggressive”. Those who are, are because they’re going through something in their personal lives. It has no place in the corporate world. If you feel angry, go to therapy. Putting down someone in a meeting is not a solution. We can grow exponentially faster together if we’re just nice to each other. Breed positivity, not aggression.
Those who are incapable of change will continue to perpetuate the belief that being polite and being kind is a weakness. The truth is that it takes an extraordinary amount of mental strength to not retaliate aggression with aggression and instead be kind. There is strength in kindness and I have seen its results in the corporate field. If you’re looking purely at productivity, the results of kindness are much faster and higher than that of a pseudo-aggressive team. Simply speaking, the ROI on kindness in the corporate world is much higher than what you would gain by being aggressive.
With benefits spanning across both professional and personal spaces, why not be kind? Listen to the other person and take a moment before you react. That one moment of your kindness could end up being a life-changing experience of the other person.
I know it’s easier to be complacent and go with the flow, but that one moment of your discomfort when you choose to retaliate aggression with kindness can be a life-changing experience for someone else.
Why not start a movement to be kind? Begin with your own team and colleagues and see the germ spread across the professional world as it becomes a much kinder place. The change will take decades to come by, but have faith that it will arrive. My friend and I are not the only two people who choose kindness in the corporate world. Choose kindness and do your part to usher in the changing tide.
First published here.
Image source: a still from the film Tumhari Sulu
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
People have relationships without marriages. People cheat. People break up all the time. Just because two people followed some rituals does not make them more adept at tolerating each other for life.
Why is that our society defines a woman’s success by her marital status? Is it an achievement to get married or remain married? Is it anybody’s business? Are people’s lives so hollow that they need someone’s broken marriage to feel good about themselves?
A couple of months ago, I came across an article titled, “Shweta Tiwari married for the third time.” When I read through it, the article went on to clarify that the picture making news was one her one of her shows, in which she is all set to marry her co-star. She is not getting married in real life.
Fair enough. But why did the publication use such a clickbait title that was so misleading? I guess the thought of a woman marrying thrice made an exciting news for them and their potential readers who might click through.
Imposter Syndromes is experienced internally as chronic self-doubt and feelings of intellectual fraudulence. There are 6 types of Imposter Syndrome.
Do you tend to be overly critical of yourself? Don’t worry, you are not alone.
Even after writing eleven books and winning several prestigious awards, Maya Angelou doubted that she had earned her accomplishments. Albert Einstein also described himself as an involuntary swindler whose work did not deserve the attention it had received.
Feeling inadequate, unworthy, and undeserving of success, along with the fear of being exposed as a fraud, is called the imposter syndrome.