If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
A pottu (or bindi) is worn as a symbol of being married or eligible to marry, but how is this tradition being used to control women?
Recently, I came across this report in The News Minute, of how a 77-year-old woman in Tamil Nadu was shamed and denied pension because she was wearing a pottu despite being a widow. When her daughter-in-law complained about it to a senior official, they were told to just ‘adjust’. The worst part is that the old lady who was already sad about her late husband’s death, was left feeling guilty about wearing a pottu.
When I was a school-going student in Chennai, the teachers often ordered us to wear pottus in the future if we weren’t already wearing one (this happened when we were quite young, it stopped later). Their right to tell us to wear a pottu was unquestionable. An opposing view is presented in this article That Red Dot where it says that only married Hindu women should be allowed to wear pottus, but either way, it is quite clear that staunch followers of the ‘Tamil culture’ are highly protective of the tradition of wearing pottus. This leaves women with no agency in deciding what to do with their own foreheads! Of course, this tradition is practiced in a problematic way all over India, but I’ll just be concentrating on Tamil Nadu in this article, and in particular, on how cinema reinforces such tradition.
Cinema of any kind both reflects and influences the society that it was produced by and Tamil cinema is no different. It harps on the pottu sentiment along with the thaali (sacred thread tied around a Hindu woman’s neck to signify that she is married) sentiment. Here is a clip from a Tamil movie called Ghilli that was a box office hit.
At the end of the clip, as the pottu is placed on the heroine’s forehead, the music changes completely and indicates something divine and the hero’s mother says that the heroine looks properly beautiful only now. The scene very clearly indicates that the heroine is the ideal bride for the hero. And that’s the sort of importance that Tamil cinema usually places on the pottu. This movie was released in 2004 but it’s quite obvious that many people still care about the pottu.
Another hit film called Chinna Thambi was released in way back in 1991. It uses the pottu sentiment too. In this case, the thaali sentiment is used along with it. In this clip below, the hero rescues his widowed mother from going through the ‘dishonour’ of having the thaali tied around her neck (because most of the time in Tamil cinema, the thaali is enough to make a marriage final and unbreakable).
She has already been forced to wear a pottu which is considered humiliating because she is a widow. Note the happiness on her face when water is splashed on her forehead and the pottu is washed off. The idea of honour is inextricably tied up with both the thaali and the pottu and it is the ultimate thing that should not be lost at any cost.
The same idea of honour is often connected to how a woman should dress, to be the kind of woman that men pray to. This clip below has the hero chastising the heroine for wearing clothes that “show too much skin” – he blames the victim of sexual harassment. This is the foundation on which rape culture is built. ‘Masculinity’ is expressed through this sort of ‘taming of the shrew’ attitude or the protection of the honour of a pious woman as seen in the previous clip.
The last clip did not involve a pottu, yet it is part of the same culture that gives a woman’s ‘honour’ (usually translated as either virginity, or if a married woman, as belonging to a particular man) the utmost importance and makes it impossible to disentangle from what she chooses to wear or not to wear. And this is used to control a woman’s sexuality.
Thus, the diktats around the pottu are part of a larger culture that propagates rape culture and blames and shames women for being in charge of their own bodies. This is why we must make it a point to wear what we want, be whoever we want to be, and we must do this completely unapologetically!
Top image is of late veteran actor Manorama from an old movie – showing the ‘ideal’ look for a widow as seen in our movies
read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Did the creators of Masaba Masaba just wake up one morning, go to the sets and decide to create something absolutely random without putting any thought into it?
Anyone who knows about Neena Gupta’s backstory would say that she is a boss lady, a badass woman, and the very definition of a feminist. I would agree with them all.
However, after all these decades of her working in the Indian film industry, is her boldness and bravery the only things worth appreciating?
The second season of Masaba Masaba (2020-2022) made me feel as if both Neena Gupta and her daughter Masaba have gotten typecast when it comes to the roles they play on screen. What’s more is that the directors who cast them have stopped putting in any effort to challenge the actors, or to make them deliver their dialogues differently.
People have relationships without marriages. People cheat. People break up all the time. Just because two people followed some rituals does not make them more adept at tolerating each other for life.
Why is that our society defines a woman’s success by her marital status? Is it an achievement to get married or remain married? Is it anybody’s business? Are people’s lives so hollow that they need someone’s broken marriage to feel good about themselves?
A couple of months ago, I came across an article titled, “Shweta Tiwari married for the third time.” When I read through it, the article went on to clarify that the picture making news was one her one of her shows, in which she is all set to marry her co-star. She is not getting married in real life.
Fair enough. But why did the publication use such a clickbait title that was so misleading? I guess the thought of a woman marrying thrice made an exciting news for them and their potential readers who might click through.