A story of love, loss and second chances by Nikita Singh, releasing this Valentine’s Day.
We are Breaking Barriers once again, are you? Join us with leading change makers.
A Fanpage video of boys being asked to slap a girl has gone viral and is being praised for showing how children are intrinsically against violence but it falls short in three ways.
A couple of days ago, a friend of mine sent me a viral Fanpage video. With each passing frame, I saw a few little boys take turns interacting with a girl. A narrator, presumably the man behind the lens himself, tells these little boys what to do. He asks them their names and ages. They respond. Then, he asks them what they want to become when they grow up. Each has a dream of his own – footballer, saving people, chef, and what not. Then he presents to them, “Martina”. For the entire length of the video, Martina is quiet. She nods, she appreciates what the boys say when they compliment her. She smiles and giggles. Then they ask the boys what they like about the little girl.
Most responses are centred on her appearance. She is called pretty and her eyes, her shoes and her hair are appreciated. One boy tells her that he wants to be her boyfriend. The narrator then asks the boys to “caress” the girl. The boys are not reluctant. They run their hands on her cheek, or on her arm. She smiles, nods. Then the narrator tells them to make funny faces at her – they do, putting on ridiculous appearances. She smiles at some, she winces at some, and she closes her eyes with a shudder at a few others. And then – the music slows down here – the narrator asks them to slap her.
They all refuse. Some, because girls should not be slapped. One, because he does not support violence. One, because Jesus told us not to hit anyone. And one, because it’s bad. By this time, the background music has come right back on – sounding quite like the kind of music you hear in a movie when the protagonist emerges victorious. Finally, the video pans back to one boy. Kiss her, the narrator’s voice says. On the lips? Or on the cheek? The boy asks.
Let me start by asserting that I claim no expertise in filmmaking, in scriptwriting or in child psychology. All that I have to say at this point is exclusively in my capacity as a consumer of information – the commoner that was the intended target for their short film.
I appreciate, fully well, that the intended message was to show that children are inclined against violence – and that adults should take a leaf from their book. But here’s why the viral Fanpage video actually doesn’t work as effectively as it should in getting the message across.
To start with, there is a presupposition that the girl is all about her physicality. Not once do we hear her speak. The boys are asked about their ambitions, their dreams and what they want to be when they grow up. The boys are asked their names and their ages. But Martina – she is introduced as Martina. She isn’t given a chance to talk about herself, she isn’t heard, and she isn’t anything more than something fit to be seen. You may say I’m nitpicking but let’s pause for a moment here and look at this in the light of the grander scheme of things. As a global community, in many, many homes, girls don’t count. What they do, what they say, what they want to do and say – are often times not given the importance they deserve. These are voices that deserve to be heard, but are not.
There is a presupposition that the girl is all about her physicality. Not once do we hear her speak. The boys are asked about their ambitions, their dreams and what they want to be when they grow up. The boys are asked their names and their ages. But Martina – she is introduced as Martina.
Secondly, the narrator asks the boys to tell him what they like about her. Almost instantly, everyone swoops in on her appearance. Not one boy asked her to speak, or share her thoughts – what if they could have made an effort to know her mind, before judging her physically? These are the rudiments that grow into full-blown mindsets and thought processes that judge and objectify women. By welcoming these boys to judge a girl for her appearance, the video inadvertently sends out the wrong message: that it is indeed okay to objectify another human being.
Thirdly, the video shows the boys being asked to caress, to make funny faces at, and to even kiss her. What’s happened in this process is a very blatant delineation of what is acceptable as falling into watertight compartments of appropriate and inappropriate conduct. The fact, though, is that these lines are blurred. The video may have wanted to project “caressing” and “kissing” as non-violent gestures but the fact is that they amount to unwanted sexual advances if the girl or woman is non-consenting. Here, in the video, there isn’t a moment’s thought spared to the girl as her consent was concerned. Besides, doing this reinforces the fact that only actual violence is violence – and the video ignores the fact that unwanted sexual conduct is also violence.
The video may have wanted to project “caressing” and “kissing” as non-violent gestures but the fact is that they amount to unwanted sexual advances if the girl or woman is non-consenting.
All intentions aside, the video fails to deliver one very, powerful message: that women and girls are not to be perceived as anything less than men and boys. The fact of the matter is that both genders are equal. There are many differences between the genders, and nothing is confined into complete compartments. Gender roles are diverse today, and their implications are equally diverse. It can be a dangerous thing if we have skewed perceptions towards different segments of the population that each hold up a part of the sky, and until we see a shift in mindsets in our perception of men and women, their roles and their equality, it could be disparaging for the future of the world as we know it.
I’d like to leave you with Audrey Hepburn’s lines as Eliza Doolittle in My Fair Lady: “You see, Mrs. Higgins, apart from the things one can pick up, the difference between a lady and a flower girl is not how she behaves, but how she is treated. I shall always be a common flower girl to Professor Higgins, because he always treats me like a common flower girl, and always will. But I know that I shall always be a lady to Colonel Pickering, because he always treats me like a lady, and always will.”
The ball is in your court. Everything depends on the mindset. It’s up to you to decide how to see everyone.
Thanks Kirthi for posting this. A very well analysed comment on the video. It is very true that the girl is not even made to express, speak or talk about her comfort level in all these, it is as if she could have been a lifeless doll.
The reality is that even educated people do this mistake of expecting the girls to be ‘cute and good-looking’ as if it is the essential criteria for being a girl. It is alright for the boys to be shaggy and it is actually ‘attractive’ but girls should be prim and proper.
We also tend to ‘groom’ the girls for marriage since their childhood, by the following:
1. involving them more in cooking and household work, because ‘we’ don’t want to get a bad name from the boy and his parents. (have you seen any girls’ parents point out mistake at the son-in-law? Even if he smokes, drinks or is infidel, the girl is asked to ‘adjust’) !!
2. asking her not to answer back, because she may tend to do the same with the in-laws. (we teach her to be submissive in most areas, then how can she be assertive in her work place, or when the husband is trying to douse her in kerosene, may be for a ‘small mistake’ like she slept off without cooking for the huge family)
3. giving her hint that ‘some careers are not suitable for girls’ as she cannot leave her child and husband later for greater career opportunities.(well snip her wings right at childhood so that she would regret for having born as a girl; wow cool, we have hit the bulls eye – that it is not accepted for a woman to dream and be herself, despite abiding by the law, culture and tradition. Whereas a man can have the cake and eat it too)
Any human should be taught to respect and not resort to violence not because they are ‘considered weak’, but it is violation of human rights.
Thank you for reading, and for sharing your beautiful thoughts. I’ve learned a lot 🙂
Great post! I also had problems with this video, though some you mentioned I didn’t even realise. Very relevant, progressive and much needed analyisis.
Would like to add one more to the list: when a boy says, “girls shoudn’t be slapped” is regressive in itself because it means that girls are considered fragile little creatures who need to be protected by boys. That they are physically inferior. This leads to the idea that girls cannot be employed in army, or other physically straining jobs.
When the comment “hitting girls is bad” is replaced by “one shouldn’t hit one another”, or that “violence is bad”, it becomes highly praise-worthy because then the onus is on the person meant to hit the other that hitting is bad, rather than who is being hit- and if that person should be hit or not.
Thanks for writing.
Many thanks, Shaifali! 🙂 Thank you for reading, and for sharing your lovely thoughts – I learned a lot from your inputs. Thank you!
A Teacher At A Haryanvi College About Their Women’s Day: Beating Patriarchy One Lesson At A Time
I Was The “Bad Girl” Who Had Watched Porn When She Was 15
Do We Need To Protect Our Girls Or Just Teach Our Boys To Respect Them?
Why The Phrase ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ Is Damaging Our Sons – Teaching Our Boys To Be Safe!
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Sign in/Register & Get personalised recommendations