Over the years, your support has made Women’s Web the leading resource for women in India. Now, it is our turn to ask, how can we make this even more useful for you? Please take our short 5 minute questionnaire – your feedback is important to us!
Why do skincare and beauty brands feel the urge to use only fair and thin models? Don't other women use their products too?
Why do skincare and beauty brands feel the urge to use only fair and thin models? Don’t other women use their products too?
This recent Loreal TV advertisement set me thinking.
The Indian version shows Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Sonam Kapoor and Freida Pinto, all looking snowy white what with their white costumes, the background and lo! their complexion.
The ad also shows a glimpse of the US version. There they had 75 year old Jane Fonda, 54 year old Julianne Moore, French actress Laetitia Casta, an Ethiopian-born model, maternal health advocate, Liya Kebede, Russian model Natasha Poly, Zoe Saldana, among others. Now isn’t that a bunch you can call “women”?
Same brand but different outlook. Can I ask why? Is it because they think Indians are narrow-minded when it comes to seeing older and darker skinned women wearing cosmetics? I was imagining how the ad would have looked if they had Rekha, Hema Malini, Nandita Das, and models from different ethnic backgrounds, all in the ‘elite’ company of Aishwarya and Sonam. Wouldn’t it have been the perfect picture? Loreal would have surely got a few more buyers with that ad.
Why do they think that in India only fair skinned women and that too who are in their 20s, buy lipstick? Ok, Aishwarya is in her 40s but she is the ‘Miss World’. It is not just with one brand. In how many shampoo ads do you see women with curly hair or middle-aged women? They all show thick straightened hair. (What if they are all computer graphics?)
Stereotyping isn’t just an issue; it is also about these products and their ultimate selling point. It all comes down to the thinking that creams and moisturisers ads look good only on fair skin. This may have to do with a fear that if they show dark-skinned models using this cream, no one would find these products attractive and then there will be fewer buyers.
Is that really so? When I come to think of it, maybe they find it hard to find dark skinned actresses who are famous. In Bollywood, actresses with dark or wheatish skin prefer looking ‘fair’ in photographs and will never admit that they are not ‘fair’, nor will they talk about their skin colour in public.
Let us voice our opinion
This bias and myopic view might not go away easily but it is high time the women of India come together and voice their opinions. It is time Loreal (and other brands too) realise that their products are also used by women who have dark skin or curly hair and who aren’t too tall or thin but who are ‘normal’, who are just women.
Once they realise this, they may change the script of their ads and their thinking and who knows, that might even increase their consumer base?!
Image used is a still from the TVC
Rajlakshmi Kurup is a freelance writer. An introvert most of the time, she loves some people! She is a dreamer and would like to remain one! read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Many women have lost their lives to this darkness. It's high time we raise awareness, and make maternal mental health screening a part of the routine check ups.
Trigger Warning: This deals with severe postpartum depression, and may be triggering for survivors.
Motherhood is considered a beautiful blessing. Being able to create a new life is indeed beautiful and divine. We have seen in movies, advertisements, stories, everywhere… where motherhood is glorified and a mother is considered an epitome of tolerance and sacrifice.
But no one talks about the downside of it. No one talks about the emotional changes a woman experiences while giving birth and after it.
Calling a vaginal birth a 'normal' or 'natural' birth was probably appropriate years ago when Caesarian births were rare, in an emergency.
When I recently read a post on Facebook written by a woman who had a vaginal birth casually refer to her delivery as a natural one, it rankled.
For too long, we have internalized calling vaginal deliveries ‘normal’ or ‘natural’ deliveries as if any other way of childbirth is abnormal. What about only a vaginal birth is natural? Conversely, what about a Caesarian Section is not normal?
When we check on the health of the mother and baby post delivery, why do we enquire intrusively, what kind of delivery they had? “Was it a ‘normal’ delivery?” we ask.