Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
This 40-year-old interview of Smita Patil on Doordarshan shows us how she was a feminist, way ahead of her times, unabashedly calling out the problematic aspects of the Hindi film industry.
Smita Patil was an iconic actress in the 1970s and 80s, known for her work in parallel cinema, apart from mainstream Bollywood movies.
Today, 17th October, would have been her 67th birthday, so let’s re-visit this 40 year old interview she gave on Doordarshan in 1983. A feminist at a time when feminism was not known much in India.
Being a feminist in 2022, I still sometimes feel the need to be “careful” with my words, while making observations about the patriarchy around me. I can only imagine the grit and candor that Smita Patil had back in the 1980s, that shines through in this interview. Her words show great clarity of thought, and she is certainly a feminist.
Here are 6 observations she makes during the interview that make it clear.
She speaks of her pride in her roles in movies like Bhumika and Manthan, where she played strong characters that showcased the real inner strength, tenacity, and grit of Indian women from all walks of life.
In Manthan, she plays Bindu – a single mother in a village, who takes life’s challenges head-on. In Bhumika, she is Usha – an actress who tries to find her footing in a world dominated by men.
She talks about how women’s roles in formulaic movies did not extend beyond black and white. Women were either shown as “Pativrata” whose sole purpose was to serve men, or in the other extreme, who were merely there for skin show.
It’s clear how there was very little effort from filmmakers to show intelligent women on screen.
When the topic shifts to prostitution, she does not vilify sex workers. She identifies how good cinema has also been made around the topic of sex work, showing the struggles these women go through. But she calls out the portrayal of sex workers in mainstream cinema, where they are used merely as a prop for nudity.
She points out how the film industry and distributors exploit actresses to attract audiences to the theaters, with provocative posters. She talks of how most actresses do not have a choice or say in their roles, especially when they are still trying to establish themselves in the industry.
She explains that given a choice, she wouldn’t have endorsed the kind of publicity that some of her posters were used for.
She talks of emerging mainstream cinema that challenges such stereotypes, quoting “Mujhe Insaaf Chahiye” as an example, which had women fighting against their rapists.
This is notable for that point in time, as rape was often only used as a plot point for male actors to “avenge” or “seek justice for”, with the women involved shown as powerless.
She then goes on to talk about how an average Indian woman trapped in the trenches of patriarchy, is systematically kept there. She observes the weak representation of such women on screen, where their ultimate validation is to be “accepted” by the men in their lives. She is vocal about how important it is to inspire them to fight against the system, through strong female leads in cinema.
Smita is truly inspirational, for using her voice to call out the problematic aspects of Hindi cinema and aspiring to represent Indian women in a better light on the big screen. To appreciate how truly valuable her views are, we must remember that this is from an era when feminism was not as prevalent as it is today.
Image source: Filmfare and YouTube
An engineer turned SAHM of two who wants to be known beyond that. Passionate about words, parenting, making eco-friendly choices, feminism and lifelong learning. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address