Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
If a wife says “No” to any sexual act, the husband experiences feelings of rage, anger, rejection, and frustration, because he has grown up feeling entitled, and was never prepared to handle any rejection.
“Our women are safe.” Really? Examine that statement instead of just talking about it, will you?
A naïve person will be deceived by this statement and an optimistic person will not be left far behind. What most people fail to address is that despite a slow change in our society, we have not yet reached a stage, where we can proclaim that we have identified the basic rights to safety held by an Indian woman and recognize that these rights shouldn’t be denied.
Indians have been slaves of patriarchy since time immemorial and this situation has not changed much. The idea that women are the dispensable and insignificant chattel of the powerful, worthy men of our society is deeply ingrained in most ignorant minds. Women are treated as someone else’s property at every stage in their lives.
Unmarried women are considered a liability to their fathers and are handed over as consideration in the contract of marriage to another man, her husband. They aren’t allowed to have any thoughts of autonomy or strength, leave alone pursue the rocky road of singledom. This stems from the belief that women are incapable of being self-sufficient, and always need a male form to protect them from the horrors of the world, that will be unleashed on them should they dare to step out alone.
This begs the question – how does she escape the abomination behind the closed doors of her home?
Women are sent to their marital homes with a rule book installed in their brains that directs them to be dutiful wives, mothers, and daughters-in-law and to obey the husband’s family at all costs. The sultry aspect of sexual pleasure and intimacy also falls within the ambit of blind obeyance. This is because of the mindset that a woman and every part of her body exists and is created only for a man’s satisfaction.
The right of engaging in or performing any act on a woman’s body lies solely within the ‘superior grasp’ of men and not in her own ‘weak’ fingers. Women are stripped of their autonomy and made into mere objects owned by men, their very purpose being to satisfy the male species. Such an attitude promotes a sense of authority amongst men, due to which they are unable to digest any different opinions or a refusal from their women.
If a wife says “No” to any sexual act that she is not comfortable with, the husband experiences feelings of rage, anger, rejection, and frustration, because he was never prepared to handle any rejection, especially from his wife. The man going through these extremely negative emotions then forces his wife to engage in the act regardless of her wishes. It is an inane obligation expected out of her, and not something that she would willingly participate in.
This is the exact point where the husband commits the terrible crime of raping his wife. Thus, the glass shielding a violent and abusive husband is shattered into pieces when the wife speaks out against his atrocities, leaving her utterly shocked and dismayed.
The act of marital rape is a completely appalling and unbelievable thought, difficult to even conceptualize. The neglect and non-intervention in such claims of marital rape have become a pattern. The general opinion that marital rape is “not a crime”, seems to have also seeped into the gaping holes of our legal system.
The act of rape is one of the most heinous crimes that one can commit and is highly condemned in any society. In ours, the condemnation is limited to those cases involving unmarried women. It is considered that the act of being married implies blanket consent from the woman and gives the man complete freedom to engage in any sexual act that he wants to, regardless of her opinion.
The act of rape is defined under section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) stating that the crime is committed when a man penetrates a woman without her informed consent. By definition, this would also satisfy the conditions of marital rape.
However, exception 2 of the same statute, is the barrier that asserts that married women are not given any respite through this section. This is inherently violative of Article 14 (Right To Equality) of the constitution as it diminishes the status of the victim just due to her marital status. When such provisions exist, it is immensely difficult to push for the criminalization of marital rape, though it was proposed by Justice J.S Verma in his Committee Report back in 2013.
Several cases of marital rape are presented in court and have had contradictory outcomes, as some judgments are based on the moral stand that a few judges take per their conscience, while others rely on the age-old derogatory and discriminatory provisions of the law. The latter judge these cases with the notion that rape is the infringement of the ‘honour’ of a woman. They believe that a wife has crossed that threshold of becoming dishonorable, as she is under the ‘protective umbrella of the husband’.
In Arnesh Kumar vs the State of Bihar, the court dismissed a wife’s plea to criminalize marital rape stating that “the law cannot change for one woman,” and that doing so would initiate the collapse of the systems of society.
This view is furthered by several notable people who reiterate the sanctity of marriage as a license for raping their wives. Some popular examples include this statement by Haribhai Chaudhary, the former Union Minister of State and Home Affairs in 2015; and the Modi Government in RIT Foundations v Union of India. The growth and movement towards a better cause cannot take place with such comments and ideologies being imposed on the masses by these influential people.
However, some survivors do get landmark and norm-breaking judgments on their side.
In Suchita Srivastav v Chandigarh Administration (2009), the judgment declared rape a violation of a life led with dignity, safe living conditions, and the right to make choices, employing provisions under article 21 (Protection of Life and Personal Liberty).
Additionally, in Justice K.S Puttaswamy v UOI (2017), the court held that there exists a right to make decisions about intimacy under the right to privacy, which falls within the scope of Article 21.
This was also invoked in the State of Karnataka v Krishnappa (2000), adding that sexual and physical violence would constitute non-consented sexual intercourse.
To lengthen the string of support, the UN Committee on CEDAW, in 2013, strongly suggested that this horrendous act be criminalized.
In the 21st century, where the world is progressing and evolving, we seem to be stagnant and glued to our pernicious societal norms and legal provisions, that are proving to be detrimental.
It is imperative to recognize and move in the direction of change to ensure the safety of our married women, who have fewer avenues to seek justice. They do not deserve to be at the receiving end of this menacing crime, solely because there exists an oppressive system that judges who can be a victim, based on marital status.
It is indeed not about the act itself, but about the power that has been snatched from women and handed to unscrupulous and insensitive men. It is therefore time to divest and strip such men of that very power.
Image source: HotStar series / YouTube
An aspiring lawyer, I study at OP Jindal Global University. Being propelled into the ever-changing maze of unlearning and development led me to discover my inclination towards women's rights and issues. I am read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Neena was the sole caregiver of Amma and though one would think that Amma was dependent on her, Neena felt otherwise.
Neena inhaled the aroma that emanated from the pan and took a deep breath. The aroma of cumin interspersed with butter transported her back to the modest kitchen in her native village. She could picture her father standing in the kitchen wearing his white crisp kurta as he made delectable concoctions for his only daughter.
Neena grew up in a home where both her parents worked together in tandem to keep the house up and running. She had a blissful childhood in her modest two-room house. The house was small but every nook and cranny gave her memories of a lifetime. Neena’s young heart imagined that her life would follow the same cheerful course. But how wrong she was!
When she was sixteen, the catastrophic clutches of destiny snatched away her parents. They passed away in a road accident and Neena was devastated. Relatives thronged her now gloomy house and soon it was decided that she should be married off.
Women today don’t want to be in a partnership that complicates their lives further. They need an equal partner with whom they can figure out life as a team, playing by each other’s strengths.
We all are familiar with that one annoying aunty who is more interested in our marital status than in the dessert counter at a wedding. But these aunties have somehow become obsolete now. Now they are replaced by men we have in our lives. Friends, family, and even work colleagues. It’s the men who are worried about why we are not saying yes to one among their clans. What is wrong with us? Aren’t we scared of dying alone? Like them?
A recent interaction with a guy friend of mine turned sour when he lectured me about how I would regret not getting married at the right time. He lectured that every event in our lives needs to be completed within a certain timeframe set by society else we are doomed. I wasn’t angry. I was just disappointed to realize that annoying aunties are rapidly doubling in our society. And they don’t just appear at weddings or family functions anymore. They are everywhere. They are the real pandemic.
Let’s examine this a little closer.
Please enter your email address