Check out these 5 useful tips for a blissful career!
Patriarchy puts women at the bottom of social hierarchy, and capitalism uses this hierarchy to build its riches, even if all women are not equally affected.
Patriarchy and capitalism can not be envisaged without each other, and if unfeasibly they could, it could implicitly be considered that the former catalyzes the latter or vice-versa.
In her novel, The God Of Small Things, Arundhati Roy has very efficiently shown both the concepts with an underscore of ecofeminism.
It is a very capitalist strategy to exploit resources to the fullest, and then if this very model of capitalism is in crisis, it calls upon women to serve the patriarchal needs either on low wages or completely free of cost, like the often invisible and unpaid labour they do in homes.
When these needs are fulfilled, women are asked to go back to their ‘normal place.’
Patriarchy and misogyny are used to build up capitalism and also violate all women. But the major question that arises here is whether all women could be compared along similar lines?
Are all women the same and face the same problems, or does every other identity/group have its battles to fight? Although we cannot put all the women under the same roof, many activists have put them under the same umbrella.
Vandana Shiva considers eco feminism a very homogeneous concept. But is it really a homogeneous concept? Identities like Dalit women, Savarna women, Black women, white women, tribal women, trans women, women marginalised by social concepts of class, and others- all these are affected very differently, even though they share a gender identity.
In post-colonial India, not only nature but women were exploited too. The very intent of men was/is to control both nature and women, the sustainers of life.
Rudimentary rights against rape were given in the year 1972 after the very infamous Mathura Rape case of 1972, wherein a tribal girl was brutally raped.
This society does not authorize women from lower social hierarchies or even from the upper ones, for that matter, to seek the answers they might not know, to question the higher authorities, to seek their rights or even to speak.
For instance, on February 3, 2022, Mahua Moitra, while delivering her speech in the Lok Sabha, was blatantly asked by the Chair of the Lok Sabha, Rama Devi, to speak less aggressively and a bit more politely.
Is this because society can not accept a woman’s outrage against the ongoing politics, which is again a weapon to subjugate, dominate and control women?
Charlotte Bronte’s novel, Jane Eyre, which teaches women to reaffirm their rights even when they are not from higher social hierarchies, is a good example of how to reclaim our rights and voice.
She reinforces the ideals of the French Revolution, namely, Liberty and Equality, and reminds every other woman to not put them at stake whatever the condition may be.
Capitalism is built on social hierarchies and class. But is it Capitalism, or is it Patriarchy that constructs social hierarchies for further exploitation?
Binaries are always problematic, whether in the case of gender or the case of capitalism and patriarchy. The answer to the question put forth previously is both and all!
Binaries are mainly set to establish the power of the powerful and subjugate the weaker, in this case, women and nature! Mother Earth holds us like a mother and feeds us like a mother, yet we do not take a step ahead to conserve, protect and respect the feminine powers guiding us.
Capitalism and Patriarchy may suppress femininity and womanhood, but we never know when the next natural calamity can hit us hard.
Image source: a still from the film Thappad
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Vanshika studies English literature at the Lady Shri Ram College for women! She is from Jammu and Kashmir and has a very vivid and vibrant culture to exhibit. She is interested in the domains of read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Neena Gupta’s take on love between a man and woman opens a can of worms. She’s speaking her truth, which is a reality for so many people, but is it universal?
Neena Gupta made a statement in her interview with Humans of Bombay that she doesn’t believe love exists between a man and a woman. She said it starts off with lust, which then changes into affection, and becomes a habit. The only love she’s ever known and felt is for her daughter, Masaba.
Neena is married to Vivek Mehra, a chartered accountant who she first met on a flight. Vivek Mehra has two children, and it’s his second marriage. It’s Neena’s second marriage too. She was earlier married at an early age of 20. She has one child, Masaba, from her previous relationship with the now retired West Indian cricketer, Vivian Richards.
Her statement about love evoked some vehement reactions ranging from she’s not met the right man to “blood runs thicker than water”.
A man doing a PhD is rebuked for not earning well. A woman on other hand is constantly questioned why she's doing a PhD when she should have been married and raising kids.
Indians have an almost fanatic obsession with the salutation Dr. Even a child who barely understands the world around, when asked “what you want to become later in life?” usually blurts out a teacher or a doctor, as these are the professionals we first encounter early on in our lives.
I too, was fascinated with the white coat fascination alongside with the Dr tag, right from childhood. However, I did not score the marks required for getting into medical college, and my dream landed on the ground with a thud, and I went in for a graduation in sciences.
My graduation and post-graduation were a roller coaster ride and a second post-graduation which I pursued since I wanted to get into the academic career brought with itself a new perspective towards life. That year I shone like the brightest star and became the most meritorious student of the campus. I cleared my Net exam much before the post-graduation results were declared, and became a sort of sensation in the university. One of my professors remarked, “So we see the next doctor in making now” when he congratulated me.
Please enter your email address