Over the years, your support has made Women’s Web the leading resource for women in India. Now, it is our turn to ask, how can we make this even more useful for you? Please take our short 5 minute questionnaire – your feedback is important to us!
Kerala High Court paves the way for survivor justice, once again, by ruling that the survivor's sexual history is of no relevance to a rape case, as it is the accused who is on trial.
Kerala High Court paves the way for survivor justice, once again, by ruling that the survivor’s sexual history is of no relevance to a rape case, as it is the accused who is on trial.
In a recent case related to the rape and impregnation of a minor by her father, the Kerala High Court had reiterated that the survivor’s sexual history is not relevant to the ongoing case. The court has sentenced the accused to 12 years of imprisonment and a fine of 50,000 rupees.
Kerala High Court, in the judgement, had mentioned that, “”Even in a case where it is shown that the victim is a girl of easy virtue or a girl habituated to sexual intercourse, it may not be a ground to absolve the accused from the charge of rape. Even assuming that the victim is previously accustomed to sexual intercourse, that is not a decisive question. On the contrary, the question which is required to be adjudicated is, did the accused commit rape on the victim on the occasion complained of. It is the accused who is on trial and not the victim.”
This is one of the many times that Kerala High Court has upheld the rights of the survivors.
In one landmark judgement Kerala High Court, while addressing the wide scope of Section 375 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code, said that sexual gratification without penetration should also be considered sexual assault. In another such judgment, Kerala HC cited marital rape as an absolutely valid ground for divorce.
In a country where as recently as this year, a Mumbai court has let a man go off on bail despite sexually assaulting and paralyzing his wife while claiming it to not be illegal, the Kerala HC’s verdicts do come as breaths of fresh air.
The Indian judicial system puts survivors through a lot of trauma during trials, the glimpse of which was shown to the Indian audience in the movie Pink.
The movie revolves around three women who were victims of attempt to sexual assault and the legal trial that followed. It held up the reality of almost all rape trials. Starting from the cross questions to character assassination to probing into the survivor’s sexual history, the judicial and legal system almost leaves no stone upturned in establishing that the abuse was everybody’s fault except the abuser’s.
This form of cross questioning is no different from blatant victim blaming. Indian courts have been using this language to further traumatize the victims and put them under immense emotional and mental distress. From falling asleep after assault to having ‘confident movements’ in behaviour ‘not like a sexual assault survivor’, it is almost as if the judiciary blames survivors for being alive, or worse, reporting their abuses.
This is, no doubt, a form of maintaining gender hierarchies, with lawyers and judges perpetuating sexist, victim blaming narratives to save the men in power.
The recent judgement also took into consideration the varied reasons why a survivor would not approach the police right off the bat while also making it very clear that “there is a gulf of difference between consent and submission”.
While, survivors and victims are constantly discouraged from speaking out or reporting their abusers to the police, this verdict sets an example for how to sensitively deal with a rape case. With more sensible judgments being passed and more sensitization workshops being undertaken by judicial and legal officials, we can only hope and pray for victim blaming in courts to soon become a rare occurrence.
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 might have had a box office collection of 260 crores INR and entertained Indian audiences, but it's full of problematic stereotypes.
Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2 starts with a scene in which the protagonist, Ruhaan (played by Kartik Aaryan) finds an abandoned pink suitcase in a moving cable car and thinks there was a bomb inside it.
Just then, he sees an unknown person (Kiara Advani) wave and gesture at him to convey that the suitcase was theirs. Ruhaan, with the widest possible smile, says, “Bomb mai bag nahi hai, bomb ka bag hai,” (There isn’t a bomb in the bag, the bag belongs to a bomb).
Who even writes such dialogues in 2022?
Most of us dislike being called aunty because of the problematic meanings attached to it. But isn't it time we accept growing old with grace?
Recently, during one of those deep, thoughtful conversations with my 3 y.o, I ended a sentence with “…like those aunty types.” I quickly clicked my tongue. I changed the topic and did everything in my hands to make her forget those last few words.
I sat down with a cup of coffee and drilled myself about how the phrase ‘aunty-type’ entered my lingo. I have been hearing this word ‘aunty’ a lot these days, because people are addressing me so.
Almost a year ago, I was traveling in a heavily-crowded bus and a college girl asked me “Aunty, can you please hold my bag?” It was the first time and I was first shocked and later offended. Then I thought about why I felt so.