#CelebrateingtheRainbow at the workplace – share your stories of Pride!
The much touted film anthology Navarasa on Netflix shows that Tamil cinema is still stuck with established names, and not yet ready to include diverse ideas and voices.
Recently film anthologies have become popular with the OTT boom. The recent release on Netflix Navarasa, with the who’s who of Tamil cinema as writers, actors, and directors has opened up another debate on Tamil cinema.
Twitter timelines have been abuzz with memes and reviews following the release of the multi-starrer, Navarasa on Netflix. Navarasa, the nine short films based on human emotions- compassion, laughter, wonder, disgust, peace, anger, fear, valour and romance, started streaming on Netflix last week.
The anthology has faced mixed reviews with many criticising the lack of socio-political understanding. Basically, the movie has laid bare the friction between ‘the established film fraternity’ versus the changing trends among audiences. The title music by A.R Rahman introduces the movies, and I think it’s apt as the notes seem to buffer the social radar turned off in the films.
Times have changed with many people becoming vocal about the disparities in our society, and the indifference that happens.
The movies all are aesthetically pleasing, technically sound with the actors emoting effortlessly, to hollow storylines. Criticism has never been appreciated in the film industry, and usually followed by smear campaigns.
But there is a growing need to acknowledge the caste, class, and gender power equations that exist, and the advent of social media has bought out the collective voices that have been simmering beneath the layers of the establishment’s definition of ‘good or bad’ film.
The most common argument put forth in defence of ‘problematic’ films is- “it’s just a movie, it’s for entertainment!”
This argument is used to justify many things including stalking, body shaming, moral policing, caste/ class/ gender misrepresentations, etc. Yes, all people do not watch a movie and act it out, but the reality that movies do impact one’s perception and worldview needs to be recognised.
As a personal example, I grew up watching so many movies that were sexist, reiterating caste pride, glorifying machismo, patronising women, demeaning gender identities, and having body shaming jokes. This has certainly led to conditioning that took many years to unravel and for me to evolve a better socio-political understanding.
Many of the present day critics (including me!) have grown up watching the films of the producer of Navarasa and his ilk, but have evolved with life-experiences, understanding gender realities, and learning the politics of Tamil Nadu.
The first movie deals with compassion following a murder. The dark tones, shots, ambience and the technicalities, expressions fail to impact as the story seems unconvincing.
The second movie makes a caricature of a person, and is marred with stereotypes of social caste, class. How is that supposed to be laughter? The movie seems to make laughter at the expense of the vulnerable, dwelling on existent class/ caste bias.
The movie on the theme disgust is based on a story by the author T. Janakiraman, and meticulously captures the world of an upper caste family wedding in grandeur, glamourising caste hierarchy. The movies- laughter and disgust both diligently follow the narratives that have been dominant in Tamil cinema.
The other movies on the themes peace and valour reduce the gravity of the issues, and gloss over, using a (forced) Tamil dialect or just the word comrade to convey a sense of authenticity. This false impression is a standard in all the movies, with love, wonder, anger, and fear following the same typecast.
There have always been discussions on issues like MeToo, questions about representations and depictions of sections within the society that reinforce cultural, caste, caste and gender stereotypes. But amplification of voices has become possible with many wanting change, and also others who want to be on the woke wagon.
To be ‘politically correct’ has become lucrative to many creators, and recent movies depict these changes in perceptions, but the tug of war continues between reality and the reel in terms of caste, class and gender representations. The film fraternity as with other institutions, lacks diversity with regards to gender and caste, with no efficient means to tackle this disparity.
With the onset of pandemic and the OTT binge craze, many platforms have recognised the need for specialised regional content. Increasingly audiences have also evolved to understand complexities, but the way creators get chosen remains helmed by the establishment or the ‘experienced’. The problem with this approach is that new talent never gets it due recognition nor deliberations. There is no dearth of talent, simply a lack of will to recognise different narratives.
Am a feminist who is wished for a room but got stuck in a jar. Still, I go on clueless but hopeful and I keep writing. Taking it one step at a time! read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Can you believe this bloke compelled me to wear only saris - full time at home- till the eighth month of my pregnancy?! The excessive heat coupled with humidity made my life miserable.
Recently when I browsed an interesting post by a fellow author on this very forum I had a sense of déjà vu. She describes the absolutely unnecessary hullabaloo over ladies donning nighties and /or dupatta –less suits.
I wish to narrate how I was in dire straits so far wearing a ‘nightie’ was concerned.
I lived in my ultra orthodox sasural under constant surveillance of two moral guardians (read Taliban) in the shape of the husband’s mom and dad. The mom was unschooled and dim-witted while the dad was a medical practitioner. But he out-Heroded the Herod in orthodoxy.
My supervisor introduced me as a valuable member of the team, emphasizing my skills and contributions rather than focusing on my gender identity. This simple act set the tone for my experience in the workplace.
As a transwoman navigating the corporate world, I had encountered my fair share of discrimination and challenges. Transitioning without the support of my parents and having limited friendships in my personal life made the journey difficult and lonely. However, when I stepped into the office, something remarkable happened, I left behind the stress and negativity, embracing a space where I could truly be myself.
Joining the marketing team as a graphic designer, I was initially apprehensive about how my colleagues would react to my gender identity. But to my surprise, the atmosphere was welcoming and respectful from day one. My supervisor, Sarah, introduced me as a valuable member of the team, emphasizing my skills and contributions rather than focusing on my gender identity. This simple act set the tone for my experience in the workplace.
As I settled into my role, I discovered that my colleagues went out of their way to make me feel comfortable and included. They consistently used my correct name and pronouns, creating an environment where I could be authentically me. Being an introvert, making friends wasn’t always easy for me, but within this workplace, I found a supportive community that embraced me for who I truly am. The workplace became a haven where I could escape the stresses of my personal life and focus on my professional growth.
Please enter your email address