If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Comparing women's bodies to 'barrels,' and fat-shaming DMK candidate Dindigul Leoni shows us again how women disrespected in our country.
Comparing women’s bodies to ‘barrels,’ and fat-shaming DMK candidate Dindigul Leoni shows us again how women disrespected in our country.
It is baffling to think that not even in our ‘modern’ world does society accept women just as they are. Or is it? The statements by political leaders crowding news and social media prove that women’s bodies and choices have become more political than ever.
One of the many politicians known for their degrading remarks about women is DMK candidate Dindigul Leoni. This time, the politician has managed to ridicule women’s bodies, mock their basic right to dietary choices and objectify them, all in the same speech.
According to a report in India Today, Leoni claimed that women have ‘lost shape’ and now look like ‘barrels.’ For the longest time, women have been conditioned to achieve and maintain the ‘ideal body type.’ A body-type that is not too heavy and neither too light, with weight and curves only in the places that patriarchy recommends.
The politician further stated that women used to be ‘thin’ and their ‘hips had curves.’ As if it wasn’t enough, Leoni further went on to equate an ideal body to good motherhood. He went on to say that when ‘women had eight-shaped bodies, they were able to hold their child on one hip. Now since women are shaped like barrels, they can’t carry their children.’
To blame the now ‘barrel-shaped’ bodies, the politician chose women’s most basic of choices – to consume whatever they like. According to Leoni, ‘drinking milk from foreign cows’ has made their bodies lose shape and apparently unfit for motherhood. Going after foreign cows is one thing but ridiculing women, their bodies and their choices a whole different one.
It is noteworthy that this statement comes closely after the one made by the Uttarakhand Chief Minister Tirath Singh Rawat. This politician chose to go after young people for their clothing.
He seems to be shocked at the sight of youngsters, especially women wearing a pair of ripped jeans. Tirath Singh Rawat’s concern also extended to women and their ability to parent. ‘What values will they pass on to their children?’ the CM remarks.
Closely following in the list of ridiculous statements is West Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh’s statement. He is asking why CM Mamata Banerjee couldn’t put on a pair of ‘Bermudas’ to show off her plastered leg.
All of these statements made by men in the public eye come down to the same thing – an attack on women’s choices to dress, eat and look however they do. What is important is that these men, broadcasted on television, set examples for society.
Each time such an instance is looked over, it becomes more okay for a male colleague to make a snide remark about a woman’s body. Or even for a schoolgirl to be called out for the length of her skirt. These statements leave impressions and create narratives that are problematic.
We may label them as just a silly remark or a slip of tongue. However, it is important to note that we live in a world where only men are ‘allowed’ to make such comments. We all know how society would react if a woman were to make such comments.
The comfort of leniency and room for these ‘mistakes’ is extended only to one gender. Media and the men it highlights may be looked over. However, women and their lives and choices are constantly sacrificed for the prevailing narrative of patriarchy.
Picture credits: Twitter handles of Dilip Ghosh and Dindigul Leoni
A student of International Relations at Shiv Nadar University. Enjoys old bands and acrylics. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
Darlings makes some excellent points about domestic violence . For such a movie to not follow through with a resolution that won't be problematic, is disappointing.
I watched Darlings last weekend, staying on top of its release on Netflix. It was a long-awaited respite from the recent flicks. I wanted badly to jump into its praise and will praise it, for something has to be said for the powerhouse performances it is packed with. But I will not be able to in a way that I really had wanted to.
I wanted to say that this is a must-watch on domestic violence that I stand behind and a needed and nuanced social portrayal. But unfortunately, I can’t. For I found Darlings to be deeply problematic when it comes to the portrayal of domestic violence and how that should be dealt with.
Before we rush to the ‘you must be having a problem because a man was hit’ or ‘much worse happens to women’ conclusions, that is not what my issue is. I have seen the praises and criticisms, and the criticisms of criticisms. I know, from having had close associations with non-profits and activists who fight domestic violence not just in India but globally, that much worse happens to women. I have written a book with case studies and statistics on that. Neither do I have any moral qualms around violence getting tackled with violence (that will be another post some day).