If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Is it fair or justified for the education ministry to go ahead with the NEET/ JEE exams as it can be dangerous mentally and physically to students, and put their careers and lives in jeopardy?
Twitter has been trending with hashtags to delay the scheduled NEET/JEE exams, in addition to hunger strikes, protests but with no avail. Students have started to understand the ‘social bubbles’ that had cocooned them so long.
Following the tweet by climate change activist Greta Thunberg in support of the students, the issue of JEE/NEET exams 2020 has started to snowball but the education ministry is firm on its mandate to conduct the exams this year. Already postponed by months, the exams are scheduled in September 2020, with around 15 lakh, 9 lakh aspirants attempting NEET and JEE respectively.
Cracking the “entrance” exams for “eligibility” to courses in medicine, engineering has been the “holy grail” for middle-class aspirations in the country. The exams are a rigorous academic marathon that children start training from secondary schools. The cottage industry of coaching, tuitions etc has kept pace with the times and preparation, financial planning of many families revolves around these exams.
Setting aside other arguments about these examinations, this time there is a widespread outcry at the callousness of the government with regard to students. With cases of COVID increasing day by day, the decision of the ministry to go ahead with the exams has put many students in a lurch. In addition to the pandemic, floods, rains, lack of public transportations, shortage of examination centres has made just arrival at the examination centre a gargantuan task.
Students have also raised concerns from a basic level that writing exams wearing the mask is a tough thing (for students who wear glasses). The constant cleaning of mist will not give them time nor concentration to process the questions. The years spent tackling the subjects, preparing for speed would be drowned in simply wiping the glasses every few minutes.
The government on its part has shared guidelines to follow while conducting these exams. While the paper planning has been “basic” the ground reality of these guidelines is a cruel joke.
Anyone who has taken any exam in the country knows that examination centres are bee-hives of anxious parents who diligently wait outside throughout the entire exercise. With insufficient increase in centres, crowd management is another issue that the states cannot tackle given the pandemic situation. The decision to go ahead with the exams has been met with widespread protest online, with many state governments too supporting the students’ stand.
While the government chooses to ignore all these arguments, in favour of the student’s “future”, it is important to ask what will be the future of a student who essentially risks her/his family’s health to take up the exam.
The costs of treating COVID, is a financial burden that most families simply cannot afford. The emotional toll on students who may become carriers would overwhelm many families, (which in India are joint) who are already dealing with financial, emotional toll following the lock-down.
Also, it’s going to be hard for many students who themselves suffer from a weakened immune system to take up the exam. It’s going to be discriminatory and doesn’t those student’s future matter?
Families from middle- and lower-income value education for social mobility. They spend their lives chalking out plans for their children’s future. Many parents can relate how they had spent the last few years just driving their kids from classes to coaching centres or waking up at odd hours to keep up with their kid’s study schedule.
The careful financial planning to accommodate the costs of these classes has made these exams a high stake, prestige battle in Indian households. Taking up the exams pawning their life is a hard sell for the families who have pinned years of hope on their children.
At the cusp of adulthood, the students preparing, taking these exams are already fragile, tense with anxiousness which is only going to be aggravated in the face of such impossible challenges. The risk of infection, community spread, medical costs are the add-ons that the government has no plans to address putting the entire onus on the student and their families.
Competitive exams like NEET/JEE are discriminatory enough when it comes to social justice but the emotional toll on students is going to be a greater social tragedy. There is also increased pressure on many students, who do not have the financial or other resources to take up the exams again. Without means to continue, under extreme duress to deliver, they are going to face immense pressure that impacts their mental well-being. By simply postponing the exams the actual “futures” of the lakhs of students can follow a positive path, rather than the present alternative, where Indian families are walking blindfolded towards the next social calamity.
Image source: Shutterstock
A homemaker following "the ten year-Bucket List." read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
Darlings makes some excellent points about domestic violence . For such a movie to not follow through with a resolution that won't be problematic, is disappointing.
I watched Darlings last weekend, staying on top of its release on Netflix. It was a long-awaited respite from the recent flicks. I wanted badly to jump into its praise and will praise it, for something has to be said for the powerhouse performances it is packed with. But I will not be able to in a way that I really had wanted to.
I wanted to say that this is a must-watch on domestic violence that I stand behind and a needed and nuanced social portrayal. But unfortunately, I can’t. For I found Darlings to be deeply problematic when it comes to the portrayal of domestic violence and how that should be dealt with.
Before we rush to the ‘you must be having a problem because a man was hit’ or ‘much worse happens to women’ conclusions, that is not what my issue is. I have seen the praises and criticisms, and the criticisms of criticisms. I know, from having had close associations with non-profits and activists who fight domestic violence not just in India but globally, that much worse happens to women. I have written a book with case studies and statistics on that. Neither do I have any moral qualms around violence getting tackled with violence (that will be another post some day).