Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
Madras High Court recently ruled on amending POSCO to consider consensual sexual relations between a girl 16 yrs and above and a boy not more than 5 years older. But is it enough?
In a recent decision, the Madras High Court made some important observations pertaining to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). In its decision, the court recommended amending POCSO in order to exclude the consideration of consensual sexual relations between a girl of 16 years and above, and a boy who is not more than five years older to her, as sexual assault. This means that consensual sexual relations in which a girl aged 16 years and above, with a boy who is a minimum of five years older to her, falls outside the ambit of sexual assault.
POCSO, as it currently stands, does not distinguish between sexual assault and consensual sexual relations between teenagers. This has been misused in many situations where underage couples elope to get married, and the disgruntled parents of the young women in such cases incriminate the boy under the provisions of POCSO. As a result of this gap in the legislative framework, according to the Tamil Nadu Commission for Protection of Child Rights, minor rape victims are not being prioritized in the system, and that the misuse of the law is disadvantageous to one side.
This decision of the Madras High Court was delivered in an elopement case. Even as the court recognized teenage sexuality and acknowledged the conceptual framework of agency, there are certain areas of concern that this judgment brings to mind. I am, of course, open to correction, engagement, and learning, and recognize that my views may – in some parts – be reactionary rather than responsive.
For starters, the decision of the court to offer a blanket determination of such cases as non-sexual assault is a bit disconcerting. It is important to acknowledge that a majority of instances of child sexual abuse and teenage sexual abuse go unreported, and, oftentimes because the perpetrator is known to the child or teen in question. In most such situations, abusers and perpetrators are largely adept at grooming their targets – particularly to the point that they elicit a “yes.” Saying yes need not necessarily originate from a place of free, fully informed, and uncoerced decision making. Grooming operates covertly, discreetly, and rather manipulatively. In a day and age where grown adults who have the capacity to consent fully and freely face gaslighting, it is hard to take a vehemently singular stand that a child or teen cannot be subject to such manipulation. Rather than to offer a one-size-fits-all provision, it’s important to recognize the need for context. It is important to acknowledge that maturity is not a function of one’s biological age
Assuming that context is given credence in an amendment, the second concern this judgment raises is in the wording of one of the key observations of the court, wherein it acknowledged that a relationship between a girl under 18 years and a boy of a similar age bracket is “the result of mutual innocence and biological attraction” and that such a relationship cannot be thought of as being “unnatural or alien between opposite sexes.” In acknowledging a one-sided assessment couched in binaries of sex, gender, and sexual attraction, the court has completely ignored non-heteronormative teen sexualities and gender identities. It is important to acknowledge that teenagers may come to recognize their sexual orientations, while some may be in an exploratory space. Attraction and innocence is not a monopoly of the heterosexual.
Drawing from the heteronormativity is a third concern. The court acknowledged specifically that cases where the “boy is not more than five years older to the girl,” consensual sexual relations between such a boy and girl would not be sexual assault. Within this explicit recognition, there lies an implicit derecognition of reversed dynamics where a boy might be younger than the girl. This also almost automatically also fails to recognize that sexual abuse can be perpetrated by individuals of any sex, gender, and sexual orientation.
At its very root, a decision seeking to set a legal framework to govern, address, and penalize sexual abuse must fundamentally begin from an understanding of the nature of the crime itself. Sexual assault is a difficult crime to prove, and a difficult crime to articulate for a survivor given the social sanction and taboos in place. Adult survivors face shame and silencing – and it can be doubly difficult for a child to come up with their stories. Consent represents blurry lines – especially when, for example, Bollywood has raised more men to believe that no means yes, and that such rhetoric can be cleverly used to manipulate a victim into “consenting.”
It is undoubtedly vital to sharpen a knife until it functions appropriately. We just need to be careful not to make it cut both ways.
Image source: a still from the movie Dhadak.
read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
People say that women are the greatest enemies of women. I vehemently disagree. It is the patriarchal mindset that makes women believe in the wrong ideology.
The entire world celebrates International Women’s Day on March 8, 2024. It should be a joyful day, but unfortunately, not all women are entitled to this privilege, as violence against women is at its peak. The experience of oppression pushes many women to choose freedom. As far as patriotism is concerned, feminism is not a cup of tea in this society.
What happens when a woman decides to stand up for herself? Does this world easily accept the decisions of women in this society? What inspires them to be free of the clutches of the oppression that women have faced for ages? Most of the time, women do not get the chance to decide for themselves. Their lives are always at the mercy of someone, which can be their parents, siblings, husband, or children.
In some cases, women do not feel the need to make any decisions. They are taught to obey the patriarchal system, which makes them believe that they are right. In my family, I was never taught to make decisions on my own. It was always my parents who bought dresses and all that I needed.
14 years after her last feature film Dhobi Ghat, storyteller extraordinaire comes up with her new film, Laapataa Ladies, a must watch.
*Some spoilers alert*
Every religion around the world dictates terms to women. The onus is always on women to be ‘modest’ and cover their faces and bodies so men can’t be “tempted”, rather than on men to keep their eyes where they belong and behave like civilized beings. So much so that even rape has been excused on the grounds of women eating chowmein or ‘men will be men’. I think the best Hindi movie retort to this unwanted advice on ‘akeli ladki khuli tijori ki tarah hoti hai’ (an alone woman is like an open jewellery box) came from Geet in Jab We Met – Kya aap gyan dene ke paise lete hain kyonki chillar nahin hain mere paas.
The premise of Laapataa Ladies is beautifully simple – two brides clad in the ghunghat that covers their identity get mixed up on a train. Within this Russian Doll, you get a comedy of errors, a story of getting lost, a commentary on patriarchy’s attitude towards women, a mystery, and a tale of finding oneself, all in one. Done with a mostly light touch that has you laughing and nodding along.
Please enter your email address