If you are a professional in an emerging industry, like gaming, data science, cloud computing, digital marketing etc., that has promising career opportunities, this is your chance to be featured in #CareerKiPaathshaala. Fill up this form today!
Women from Kerala are protesting the Sabarimala verdict, their presence often validated by male family members, furthering women's exclusion and perpetuating the 'kulasthree' stereotype.
Women from Kerala are protesting the Sabarimala verdict, their presence often validated by male family members, furthering women’s exclusion and perpetuating the ‘kulasthree’ stereotype.
Kerala has been witnessing large scale polarization with women at the forefront, following the Sabarimala verdict.
The Sabarimala temple has a story of gender discrimination, with women between the age of 10 and 50 barred entry into its premises. It is also one of the Ayyappa temples in the country that witnesses massive crowds of male pilgrims during the festivals. Following the Supreme Court verdict removing the ban, Kerala society has been churning out its deeply seated misogyny and caste-based divisive politics that had long been acting as an undercurrent, and shaping the collective sensibility of its people.
It is quite fascinating to watch the manner in which the Malayalee society has been responding to the verdict, following the government’s decision to adhere to the verdict and provide all facilities for women to visit the shrine when it opens for pilgrims on October 17th.
Following the verdict, Kerala has been the stage for protests against it, spearheaded by upper caste community organizations with a massive participation of women belonging to the upper castes. They are the stereotypes of the Kulasthree, the upper caste conservative female, the oft-used trope for Malayalee woman in literature, films and every other form of art. She is the preserver of culture, the super-woman who protects and nurtures her family, the light that brightens up the home, the angel in the house, the warrior who will fight for her family, her nation and of course, her deity’s celibacy.
Protest marches have these women in large numbers present, maintaining their ‘identity’ and speaking volumes through their attire and conduct. She is mostly seen in a saree, or in the traditional off-white kasavu saree, wearing a pious look with sandal paste on the forehead and chanting Ayyappa mantras loudly. Their presence is often validated by their male family members who are also part of these protest groups.
The exclusion of Dalit and other backward communities is striking. They have either preferred to remain silent or to speak in favour of the verdict. Here again, the absence of women welcoming the verdict speaks eloquently of the politics of misogyny that exploits women’s absence/presence in an issue that directly affects their inclusion/exclusion in the community.
It is quite depressing to observe these kulasthree women stereotypes walk and chant mantras along with their masters to ensure that they remain marginalised for being women, for being sexually active individuals, for being capable of giving birth, and willing t wait till they, according to men, have lost their sexual energies and are no longer a threat to the perverts around the world.
Image source: a still from the movie Ever Vivahitharayal
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views. Individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times. If you have a complementary or differing point of view, sign up and start sharing your views too!
Reads and writes and thinks about gender identities and cultural contexts.. involves actively in women's issues.. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Shows like Indian Matchmaking only further the argument that women must adhere to social norms without being allowed to follow their hearts.
When Netflix announced that Indian Matchmaking (2020-present) would be renewed for a second season, many of us hoped for the makers of the show to take all the criticism they faced seriously. That is definitely not the case because the show still continues to celebrate regressive patriarchal values.
Here are a few of the gendered notions that the show propagates.
A mediocre man can give himself a 9.5/10 and call himself ‘the world’s most eligible bachelor’, but an independent and successful woman must be happy with receiving just 60-70% of what she feels she deserves.
As long as teachers are competent in their job, and adhere to the workplace code of conduct, how does it matter what they do in their personal lives?
A 30 year old Associate Professor at a well-known University, according to an FIR filed by her, was forced to resign because the father of one of her students complained that he found his son looking at photographs of her, which according to him were “objectionable” and “bordering on nudity”.
There are two aspects to this case, which are equally disturbing, and which together make me question where we are heading as a society.
When the father of an 18 year old finds his son looking at photographs of a lady in a swimsuit, he can do many things. What this parent allegedly did was to dash off a letter to the University which states: