Check out the ultimate guide to 16 return-to-work programs in India for women
Why do folks find it so hard to accept that patriarchy (and its emphasis on power) is often behind attacks on women? That it's not just 'some bad guys'?
Why do folks find it so hard to accept that patriarchy (and its emphasis on power) is often behind attacks on women? That it’s not just ‘some bad guys’?
Recently, I was asked to participate as a speaker on a talk show on live television, on WiON. The others on the panel were Rahul Easwar (best known for his support for the Sabarimala ban on women), and Hema, a Malayalam film actress. We were discussing whether South India was becoming unsafe for women, given the recent incident involving the actress in Kerala. I was extremely grateful for the opportunity, because this conversation has been desperately in need of attention, and it was high time we gave it value.
The truth is, the number of incidents of attacks on women is not on the rise as much as the number of reported incidents is on the rise. Assess a room full of women in most Indian cities or towns, and you’ll hear a bunch of stories of incest, domestic violence and marital rape. What South India (and indeed, all of India) ails from is not a new trend of rising crimes, but a culture of silence and conservativeness in approaching sexual violence. The taboo is further exacerbated by a culture of normalization of objectification and harassment of women – which is clear as day for anyone who so much as samples any of the films from the four film industries down south.
Through the course of the conversation, Easwar was firm in asserting his stand: that sexual violence is not about patriarchy, but about perversion. He said that Kerala was once safe and said, “… this is not a time where we should have some kind of an anti-cultural narrative, rather, it is time to have a cultural narrative. We are losing our culture, and this is one of the reasons; That is why there is an increasing number of atrocities against women. That’s the reason why I earlier quoted Amartya Sen, to prove that the more liberal, the more safe you are, is a very wrong notion.”
He said there was a need for value education and more CCTV cameras. He talked of premarital education and family education and a social upbringing rather than blaming culture. He went on to say, “Please remember, Patriarchy is not at issue here, it is perversion. We can debate patriarchy on a different topic. But Patriarchy or Feminism is not the topic here. We are discussing perverts.”
Easwar talked about looking at it scientifically, socially and culturally, rather than being ultra liberal. He talked about online violence and rape-tubes being a form of perversion. He also mentioned that the internet played a role in making the youngest convict in the Delhi Gang Rape incident of December 16, 2012, and then, proceeded to mansplain what rape and feminism is with this: “What happens with the feminist view point is that they confuse issues. Please remember, rape is primarily about sexual perversion. It is not about the assertion of male over female, it is the assertion of one’s perversion over another person. A 30 year old man is not exerting his power over a three year old kid, it is perversion. This is not Adler’s inferiority complex.”
It felt like a thunderstorm of garbled ideas, listening to it while still remaining Zen-like. What this diatribe completely ignored is the element of structural violence that patriarchy is, that constantly speaks to the male mindset of dominance, and reinforces it. It ignores the fact that in the case of the Kerala actor who was abducted and molested, it was patriarchy that led the culprits to think that she, rather than they, would be shamed. It did exactly what the redundant and futile campaign of #NotAllMen did.
In the process, this diatribe became another episode of the patriarchy speaking in its loud, egotistical and self-absorbed voice, missing the entire point of gender equality altogether. The fact is that patriarchy is structural violence, and patriarchy is perversion. No feminist worth her salt paints every man as a rapist or molester. We women know for a fact that men also stand to lose because of patriarchy, but it is outright demeaning to disown the role men play in keeping the patriarchy alive by calling it something else.
Waving the perversion rhetoric in our face to disown the role of patriarchy is only reasserting the very prototype that we are taking down. This thought process is a product of the fragile ego of toxic masculinity that continues to try and retain its dominance.
After all, patriarchy is a perversion.
Become a premium user on Women’s Web and get access to exclusive content for women, plus useful Women’s Web events and resources in your city.
Top image via Pixabay
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
If her MIL had accepted her with some affection, wouldn't they have built a mutually happier relationship by now?
The incident took place ten years ago.
Smita could visit her mother only in summers when her daughter had school holidays. Her daughter also enjoyed meeting her Nani, and both of them had done their reservations for a week. A month before their visit, her husband told her, “My mom is coming for 4-5 months!”
Smita shuddered. She knew the repercussions. She would have to hear sarcastic comments from her mother-in-law for visiting her mother. She may make these comments directly only a bit, but her servants would be flooded with the words, “How horrible she is! She leaves me and goes!”
Maybe Animal is going to make Ranbir the superstar he yearns to be, but is this the kind of legacy his grandfather and granduncles would wish for?
I have no intention of watching Animal. I have heard it’s acting like a small baby screaming and yelling for attention. However, I read some interesting reviews which gave away the original, brilliant and awe-inspiring plot (was that sarcastic enough?), and I don’t really need to go watch it to have an informed opinion.
A little boy craves for his father’s love but doesn’t get it so uses it as an excuse to kill a whole bunch of people when he grows up. Poor paapa (baby) what else could he do?
I was wondering; if any woman director gets inspired by this movie and replicates this with a female protagonist, what would happen?. Oh wait, that’s the story of so many women in this world. Forget about not giving them love, you have fathers who try to kill their daughters or sell them off or do other equally despicable things.
Please enter your email address