If you want to become a freelance writer- understand the opportunities that exist today, and how to access them. Register Now!
Pre-order Paradise Towers by Shweta Bachchan Nanda on Amazon, send us the screenshot of the pre-order confirmation on email@example.com to win a chance to be at the launch party!
Why can’t we consider the different ways in which women think and do things as normal? Why should the masculine be considered the norm in independence and identity?
Independence is about figuring out what you believe in and what works best for you and making decisions accordingly. It should not matter if the decisions happen to be in agreement with authority or anyone else.
We see an interesting example of the evolution of a bid for independence in teenagers. Teens, in a attempt to be independent and establish their own identity often do exactly what their parents advise them against. It is the first step to independence, yes. But it is still only a reaction to authority. A negative one instead of a positive one, but still a reaction. It may feel like independence to defy authority. But that is not what independence is really about. One is almost as much defined by authority, if one chooses to defy it just for the sake of defiance, as they would be, were they to always comply with authority.
This was Polonius’s last piece of advice to his son Laertes before he leaves to lead an independent life, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
This is what I feel like telling the women trying to be independent and find their own identities in a male dominated society. Being a strong and independent woman, should not mean emulating men. While women should have the option to choose from every career path, hobby, and activity men are offered, they should not have to feel pressured to make the choices commonly made by men.
It is, of course, important that women are given all the choices. But it is also important to remember that just because there are more choices available they are not necessarily better for everyone.
For example, consider two women, one who is talented at and passionately enjoys sewing and another who is a gifted engineer. In most traditional societies the first woman would be able to happily follow her passion and the second would probably be denied the pleasure of following her dreams.
But as society advanced women were given more choices. In this more liberal society the second woman would now be able to thrive. But does it makes sense for this society to look down upon a woman who genuinely enjoys sewing? Just because new options are now available to women, does not mean every woman must feel compelled to make use of those options. It also does not mean that women who do not make use of the newly available options are necessarily weaker. After all that is the whole point of having a choice, to be able to choose among many different possibilities, including the ones that were already available.
When we move from a male dominated society towards a gender neutral one there is often a tendency to glorify activities and attributes more commonly adopted by males, and look down on activities and attributes more commonly adopted by females. Often this is not by conscious decision but a sub conscious remnant of the past.
For example, in work places you will often hear that women are emotional and that is automatically considered a bad thing. But what makes being emotional bad and being competitive good? Is it that there is something intrinsically bad about being emotional and good about being competitive? Or is it that we have allowed for traits more commonly shown by men to be considered good and those more commonly shown by women to be considered bad?
Women more commonly watch soaps and men more commonly watch sports, so watching sports is better. Why? They are both passive forms of entertainment. But even women sometimes don’t realize this and think there is something intrinsically more noble about watching sports than soaps.
True independence comes from knowing yourself and being proud to be who you are. That is the only way to be truly confident and content. We women need to love ourselves for who we really are and value our strengths and talents whatever they may be. We need to be true to ourselves and believe in ourselves. Only then will we be really free!
Image source: confused woman wondering about her choices by Shutterstock.
Kanika G, a physicist by training and a mother of 2 girls, started writing to
Excellent article with very meaningful content!! I completely agree that sometimes the modern approach to fixing gender inequality becomes an aberration if we understand that the only solution is for women to make those exact same choices and decisions that men traditionally justified and thus repeat the same mistakes as well!! For example being arrogant or misusing one’s sense of power and authority derived from being the higher earning member of the family will be as disastrous for the individual and family life even if a woman chose it to be a definition of self or independence as traditional patriarchy had portrayed or justified it. Our innate sense of self be it gentleness or being nurturers should not be snuffed out to gain equality, just as our innate sense of independence or problem solving shouldn’t be suppressed to facilitate inequality. Culturally defined roles must be reorganised to be fair and just so that men and women have a guilt free sense of freedom and comfort- to just be themselves !!!
Thanks Sonia and a good point about learning from mistakes 🙂
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
Sign in/Register & Get personalised recommendations