Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
Are item numbers art or a collection of anatomical images served up in the guise of a woman?
Last week, I came across one of those all too common, ‘hot’ pictures of aspiring Bollywood actresses in a popular, mainstream newspaper. No doubt, said newspaper assumes that no one under the age of 13 reads newspapers, or even if they do, they are in any case bombarded by such hotness from every other medium, including the promotions for ‘item numbers’ on every television channel that there is no need to consider the age-appropriateness of any visuals used.
What really caught my eye was the caption this hot picture carried. It helpfully mentioned that the pic in question was from a shoot for a calendar that the actress was being featured in, and said calendar was a “collector’s item, just as she is.”
When does a woman become an item? And who is ‘collecting’ these women?
As a feminist who believes in women’s autonomy, including the right to wear what one wants, item numbers nevertheless make me uncomfortable. It is not even so much the lack of clothing that makes me uncomfortable; it is the unimaginative costumes with their relentless focus on strategic parts of the woman’s body – the heaving chest and the wobbling behind that the camera embraces as though a woman were a sum of these two alone. Forget the item girl – this is not even a whole girl (or woman), but a collection of anatomical images served up for the pleasure of a (presumably) male viewer.
While the actresses who do these item numbers derive a lot of fame and appreciation, the images served up rarely give us anything coherent – it’s certainly not a showcase for her emotive skills. Replace Kareena with Katrina or any other popular actress, and the camera will continue its zooming in on boob and butt. Presumably, the film-makers have never heard of any other erogenous zones, or that sex really happens between the ears or that – gasp – women could get pleasure as well as give.
And then, never mind that some of this disembodying of women takes place in a movie like Ra.One touted as a movie for kids. No sex education for our kids, thank you, but we’re happy to help them learn that the value of a woman lies in two things chiefly.
Pic: Kareena Kapoor in Ra.One; Source: Business Of Cinema
Founder & Chief Editor of Women's Web, Aparna believes in the power of ideas and conversations to create change. She has been writing since she was ten. In another life, she used to be read more...
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address