Check out 16 Return-To-Work Programs In India For Ambitious Women Like You!
A recent HBR article shows that women receive feedback in less constructive or specific results focused ways. Here's why.
Have you ever received feedback that you’ve found was vague or not useful? If your answer is yes, then you’re not alone. A recent HBR article shows that women are less likely to receive constructive or specific feedback that is results focused.
Feedback is a widely used input into performance management and talent development, usually received by employees from their subordinates, managers and peers. While it is a helpful input towards development, it can also be ambiguous or gender stereotypical.
Whether you are a man or woman could affect how you are evaluated and this can impact your career progression in organizations. Research by the Clayman Institute suggests that the developmental feedback received by men was more linked to their business outcomes while the same received by women was more related to their interpersonal style. Susan Colantuno in her TED Talk discusses how the advice given to women to advance their careers highlights the value of confidence, creating a personal brand, negotiation, enhancing communications skills, along with team engagement but misses out the importance of strategic thinking, commercial acumen and financial knowledge required for leadership.
In order to see if similar patterns emerge in India, a study by YSC which I co-authored, analysed feedback given to mid to senior level leaders in 15 organizations across India. Men tended to have more raters and received more feedback than women, which emphasizes a gap in the amount of feedback women received. Women are just as likely to ask for it but are less likely to receive feedback as compared to their male colleagues. However, we did see women receiving more specific feedback on their developmental areas including detailed observations and examples which is beneficial for their growth.
Male leaders rated themselves higher on agentic qualities which are more associated with traditional leadership which conveys control and assertion. They were also rated higher by others on similar traits but not on others which are more communal in nature for instance, collaboration, building consensus, etc.
Even though women’s strengths emphasized their agentic attributes of assertion and self-confidence along with their ability to build rapport and communicate effectively; when it came to their developmental areas, the emphasis was still on direction, independence, etc. Men’s strengths were described more in terms of how they got the work done, highlighting aspects of business while women’s strengths were more likely to feature feedback about the individual or the team.
Feedback is a critical aspect in development and the path to progression but can be biased in predictably stereotypical ways. Employees benefit most from balanced feedback which is focused around the different areas of leadership and is essential for the success of the organization. As leaders and managers, we should be conscious of giving objective feedback which is constructive and specific, after observing the person’s behaviour in different environments.
Top image via Unsplash
Nikita is a Industrial/Organizational Psychologist with a passion of psychological assessment, leadership development and diversity & inclusion. As a Research Consultant with YSC, a leadership consulting firm, she current heads the Insights Team in India. read more...
Women's Web is an open platform that publishes a diversity of views, individual posts do not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions at all times.
Stay updated with our Weekly Newsletter or Daily Summary - or both!
UP Boards Topper Prachi Nigam was trolled on social media for her facial hair; our obsession with appearance is harsh on young minds.
Prachi Nigam’s photo has been doing the rounds on social media for the right reasons. Well, scratch that- I wish the above statement were true. This 15-year-old girl should ideally be revelling in her spectacular achievement of scoring a whopping 98.05% and topping her tenth-grade boards. But oddly enough, along with her marks, it’s something else that garners more attention – her facial hair.
While the trolls are driving themselves giddy by mocking this girl who hasn’t even completed her school yet, the ones who are taking her side are going one step ahead – they are sharing her photoshopped pictures, sans the facial hair, looking nothing less than a celebrity with captions saying – “Prachi Nigam, ten years later”.
Doctors have already diagnosed her with PCOD in their comments, based on photographic evidence. While we have names for people shamed for their weight – body shaming, for their skin colour- racism, for their age- age shaming, for being a female- sexism, this category of shaming where one faces criticism for their appearance has no name. With that, it also has zero shame attached to it.
Please enter your email address